![[Valid RSS]](images/valid-rss-rogers.png "Valid RSS")
This is a valid RSS feed.
This feed is valid, but interoperability with the widest range of feed readers could be improved by implementing the following recommendations.
line 15, column 37: (18 occurrences) [help]
<guid isPermaLink="false">33651</guid>
^
line 18, column 6: (18 occurrences) [help]
<dc:creator>DavidEgg</dc:creator>
^
line 19, column 6: (18 occurrences) [help]
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Hello,<br />
^
<pre class="bbCodeCode" dir="ltr" data-xf-init="code-block" data-lang="">< ...
<pre class="bbCodeCode" dir="ltr" data-xf-init="code-block" data-lang="">< ...
line 211, column 0: (4 occurrences) [help]
target="_blank"><img src="https://adsm.org/forum/data/attachments/1/1576-9 ...
line 282, column 0: (2 occurrences) [help]
I'm wondering how people handle LTO9 intialization <img src="data:image ...
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"> <channel> <title>ADSM.ORG - Enterprise Storage Management Discussion Forum</title> <description>IBM Spectrum Protect, Tivoli, TSM, ADSM, AWS, Azure, Cloud Storage, Avamar, NetWorker, NetBackup , Storage, Backup, Restore, Recovery</description> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 20:07:44 +0000</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 20:07:44 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>ADSM.ORG - Enterprise Storage Management Discussion Forum</generator> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php</link> <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/-/index.rss"/> <item> <title>Informix restore on another node</title> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:39:29 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/informix-restore-on-another-node.33651/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33651</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (DavidEgg)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tsm-client.60/"><![CDATA[TSM Client]]></category> <dc:creator>DavidEgg</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Hello,<br /><br />I have one TSM client (v7.1) that is backing up Informix 11.50 via a TSM server (v7.1)<br />I would like to restore these data on another TSM client SPR 8.1.19 version that is not connected to the TSM server 7.1<br />Can you please help me to understand how to configure dsm.opt and / or dsm.sys files on the client where the data has to be restored to ?<br />Thank you</div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>TDP for Oracle LAN-Free restore problem</title> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:38:30 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/tdp-for-oracle-lan-free-restore-problem.33653/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33653</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (gatherpc)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tdp-application-layer-backup.10/"><![CDATA[TDP/Application Layer Backup]]></category> <dc:creator>gatherpc</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I once was a fairly competent ADSM/TSM administrator a couple of decades ago, but have only dabbled more recently. But I've picked up a piece of work to upgrade the drives and library from TS3310/LTO5 to TS4300/LTO9 in an aging TSM environment with restrictions on software levels and hardware components.<br /><br />We have Oracle with RMAN running using TDP for Oracle, running on a mainly AIX estate with TSM Server 8.1.13.100 (held back because AIX 7.1 TL5 is the latest OS we can easily put on the...<br /><br /><a href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/tdp-for-oracle-lan-free-restore-problem.33653/" class="link link--internal">Read more</a></div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Library Client on Rhel</title> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:07:30 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/library-client-on-rhel.33648/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33648</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (naresh4u2007)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tsm-operation.75/"><![CDATA[TSM Operation]]></category> <dc:creator>naresh4u2007</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">We have a TS4500 library with library manager running RHEL with lin_tape drivers.<br /> <br />We have library manager clients running on Windows where the access to tapes are working fine, now we have new RHEL clients where we are having some issues getting the tape mounts to work. Two different cases with IBM ongoing, one hardware and one software.<br /> <br />Software case they are saying to use lin_tape drivers, but hardware says to use IBM device drivers ref <a href="https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/ORLZ7EMG" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">Independent Software Vendor (ISV) matrix for...</a><br /><br /><a href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/library-client-on-rhel.33648/" class="link link--internal">Read more</a></div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Request to help to install Spectrum Protect client on Solaris 11 local zone</title> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:47:49 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/request-to-help-to-install-spectrum-protect-client-on-solaris-11-local-zone.33652/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33652</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (rpandey)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tsm-operation.75/"><![CDATA[TSM Operation]]></category> <dc:creator>rpandey</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Hi<br />Can someone please help me with Spectrum Protect client installation on Sloaris Sparc 11?<br /><br />root@dtupmpvu02:/etc# uname -a<br />SunOS dtupmpvu02 5.11 11.4.55.138.3 sun4v sparc sun4v non-global-zone<br /><br />I need to setup backup for local zone only. <br />---------------------------------------------------------<br />root@dtupmpvu02:/home/rpandey# pkginfo |grep -i tiv<br />application TIVsmCapi IBM Spectrum Protect Solaris API Client<br />application TIVsmCba IBM Spectrum Protect Solaris Backup Archive Client...<br /><br /><a href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/request-to-help-to-install-spectrum-protect-client-on-solaris-11-local-zone.33652/" class="link link--internal">Read more</a></div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>old data don't expire on source server</title> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 15:44:58 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/old-data-dont-expire-on-source-server.33650/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33650</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (fredric)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tsm-operation.75/"><![CDATA[TSM Operation]]></category> <dc:creator>fredric</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Hi,<br />I have a primary source SP 8.1.21 server that replicate data(VMware) (stgrule replication) to a target server SP 8.1.21<br />I have different copygroup policies on the target server. On target the data are expired according the policy (30days), but on the source server the data aren't expired. It should be expired after 80days, but I can see data from September 2023 (show versions) for the VM I investigate. I have ran expired inventory on both servers, on the source server I can see that it...<br /><br /><a href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/old-data-dont-expire-on-source-server.33650/" class="link link--internal">Read more</a></div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Client installation on Solaris Sparc 11</title> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:05:29 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/client-installation-on-solaris-sparc-11.33649/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33649</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (rpandey)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tsm-client.60/"><![CDATA[TSM Client]]></category> <dc:creator>rpandey</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Hi <br />Can someone please help me with Spectrum Protect client installation on Sloaris Sparc 11? <br /><br />root@dtupmpvu02:/etc# uname -a<br />SunOS dtupmpvu02 5.11 11.4.55.138.3 sun4v sparc sun4v non-global-zone<br /><br />I need to setup backup for local zone only.</div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>TSM 6. Can you go back?</title> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:12:47 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/tsm-6-can-you-go-back.23157/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">23157</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (littlepuppi)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tsm-server.59/"><![CDATA[TSM Server]]></category> <dc:creator>littlepuppi</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Dodged a bullet today as not started my TSM upgrade to 6.1.4.5 - checked for last minute updates and its been pulled...<br /><br />Question is.<br /><br />Can TSM 6 roll back.. If I had upgraded to 6.1.4.5, could I then apply 6.1.4.3?<br /><br />OR are you looking at dbrestore etc etc?</div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Damaged extents after upgrade to 8.1.19 BE AWARE</title> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:49:02 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/damaged-extents-after-upgrade-to-8-1-19-be-aware.33647/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33647</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (uffeg)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tsm-server.59/"><![CDATA[TSM Server]]></category> <dc:creator>uffeg</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b>We have had such a struggle with damaged extents and asked IBM for the reason.<br />TODAY I finally got a reply in another case where we asked about move container with defrag=yes. If that is okay in 8.1.21 since we suspected that could be a reason on 8.1.19.<br /><br />IBM now wrote:<br /><br />Thank you for the updates. This is Merna with SP support team, I will be working with you in this case.<br />As I understood that you're trying to enable defrag to solve damaged extents appeared after upgrade !<br />Auto defrag...</b><br /><br /><a href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/damaged-extents-after-upgrade-to-8-1-19-be-aware.33647/" class="link link--internal">Read more</a></div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>stgrule actiontype=copy for the tsm for virtual machine restore from tape copy</title> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:41:30 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/stgrule-actiontype-copy-for-the-tsm-for-virtual-machine-restore-from-tape-copy.33606/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33606</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (naresh4u2007)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/restore-recovery-discussion.20/"><![CDATA[Restore / Recovery Discussion]]></category> <dc:creator>naresh4u2007</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Hello , <br /><br />Any one tried stgrule with actiontype=copy for the virtual environment to perform the restore from tapes. <br />primary stgpool is containers and we are running daily stgrule with actiontype=copy to the tapes and when we make primary stgpool unavailable to perform the restore from tapes it is too slow. <br />Any one experience these issue please suggest how to proceed. <br />Regards,<br />Naresh</div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>22</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Tape fill stuck at 77%</title> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:15:10 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/tape-fill-stuck-at-77.33646/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33646</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (seempoke)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tsm-operation.75/"><![CDATA[TSM Operation]]></category> <dc:creator>seempoke</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Hi.<br />I'm new to TSM. Help with advice please.<br />Tape ML3146L6 fill stuck at 77%. It looks like the tape has failed. TSM continues unsuccessful attempts to write data for the third day.<br />How to properly remove it from the stgpool by transferring the data to another tape? <br /><br /> <div class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--screenLimited bbCodeBlock--code"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-title"> Code: </div> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content" dir="ltr"> <pre class="bbCodeCode" dir="ltr" data-xf-init="code-block" data-lang=""><code>tsm: TSMSRV_SERVER1>q vol stgpool=VIRT_STG Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status------------------------...</code></pre> </div></div><br /><a href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/tape-fill-stuck-at-77.33646/" class="link link--internal">Read more</a></div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Storage pool migration issues</title> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:52:24 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/storage-pool-migration-issues.33645/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33645</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (Mac)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/backup-archive-discussion.8/"><![CDATA[Backup / Archive Discussion]]></category> <dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I want to migrate data from disk to tape but whenever i run the migration command i get the following message yet there is clearly data still in the disk. i have enough space in the tapes. i can migrate the other storage pools but there are two that give me the No data to process message<a href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?attachments/capture-png.1791/" target="_blank"><img src="https://adsm.org/forum/data/attachments/1/1576-99b30fed8949971df43a6a17cbdee289.jpg" class="bbImage " style="" alt="Capture.PNG" title="Capture.PNG" width="938" height="100" loading="lazy" /></a><br /><br /><a href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?attachments/capture1-png.1792/" target="_blank"><img src="https://adsm.org/forum/data/attachments/1/1577-637a25544893df6331eb6fb68d262af4.jpg" class="bbImage " style="" alt="Capture1.PNG" title="Capture1.PNG" width="614" height="26" loading="lazy" /></a><br /><br />ANR2111W MIGRATE STGPOOL: There is no data to process for DISK-DAILY-STGP.</div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>mount issue with virtual tapes</title> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 22:15:51 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/mount-issue-with-virtual-tapes.33642/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33642</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (dkastens)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/vtl-virtual-tape-library.79/"><![CDATA[VTL - Virtual Tape Library]]></category> <dc:creator>dkastens</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Hi,<br />I defined a dd6400 vtl with lto8 drives and tapes. The backup works, but I see, that during a backup the tape seems to be mounted and dismounted for every single file. After a while, the "query volume" command shows, that the tape has been mountet more than 3000 times!!! The actlog is full of messages:<br /><div class="bbTable"><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><code class="bbCodeInline">03.04.24 09:52:45</code></td><td><code class="bbCodeInline">ANR0511I</code><code class="bbCodeInline"> Session 12942 opened output volume A00000L8. (SESSION: 12942)</code></td></tr><tr><td><code class="bbCodeInline">03.04.24 09:52:45</code></td><td></td></tr></table>...</div><br /><a href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/mount-issue-with-virtual-tapes.33642/" class="link link--internal">Read more</a></div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>8</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Issue accessing objects from Linux client on different Win client</title> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:59:02 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/issue-accessing-objects-from-linux-client-on-different-win-client.33643/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33643</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (VolodymyrLytvyn)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tsm-client.60/"><![CDATA[TSM Client]]></category> <dc:creator>VolodymyrLytvyn</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Customer has Linux based client, with legacy filespaces and objects<br />I create Win-based client in C# language. It works as expected with filespaces and objects created under other win clients.<br />It also sees filespace from linux-based node referenced by access rule. But it does not see objects. There is difference in hl/ll delimiter, linux client has / while win client has \<br />(Another win client I have is api's sample console client, but it does not implement cross-platform feature as I guess)...<br /><br /><a href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/issue-accessing-objects-from-linux-client-on-different-win-client.33643/" class="link link--internal">Read more</a></div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Client's hl/ll dir delimiter, Ever changed?</title> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 11:58:48 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/clients-hl-ll-dir-delimiter-ever-changed.33644/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33644</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (VolodymyrLytvyn)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tsm-operation.75/"><![CDATA[TSM Operation]]></category> <dc:creator>VolodymyrLytvyn</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Did you ever successfully change default hl/ll dir delimiter of your TSM client?</div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>LTO9 initialization</title> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 18:41:17 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/lto9-initialization.33633/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33633</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (vegivamp)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tsm-operation.75/"><![CDATA[TSM Operation]]></category> <dc:creator>vegivamp</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Hullo ladies, gents and enby friends,<br /><br />I'm wondering how people handle LTO9 intialization <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> <br /><br />I'm aware that IBM has recently added some verbs for it to ITDT, and iirc the IBM TS libraries have the option in the interface as well, but those of us with other vendors are screwed, right? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Not to mention that intiialization outside of TSM is going to get in the way of TSM operations...<br /><br />I've already played with LABEL LIBVOLUME, and that does actually work - I was afraid it'd timeout, but it...<br /><br /><a href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/lto9-initialization.33633/" class="link link--internal">Read more</a></div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>TSM install problem, Rocky 8</title> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 14:56:32 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/tsm-install-problem-rocky-8.33624/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33624</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (KevinP)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tsm-server.59/"><![CDATA[TSM Server]]></category> <dc:creator>KevinP</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">We're running Rocky 8 and trying to install TSM server 8.1.17 on it. Previously we've been running on CentOS 7.<br /><br />Just wondering if anyone is successfully running on Rocky 8.</div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>TS4300 drive zoning</title> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:42:15 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/ts4300-drive-zoning.33636/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33636</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (EricvanLoon)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/tape-media-library.9/"><![CDATA[Tape / Media Library]]></category> <dc:creator>EricvanLoon</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Hi everybody,<br /><br />I'm using a TS4300 with 10 drives. On the TS4300, I defined a control path for all drives.<br />The SP server is equipped with two dual-port HBA's. One port per HBA is used for disk, the other two are used for tape. Each HBA is connected to a different fabric (Fabric0 and Fabric1). The drives themselves are connected with one port only. Currently, I use point-to-point zoning, so each drive can be accessed through one HBA, all even drives on HBA1, all odd drives on HBA2.<br />I have been...<br /><br /><a href="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/ts4300-drive-zoning.33636/" class="link link--internal">Read more</a></div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>10</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>I am back!</title> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 09:39:34 +0000</pubDate> <link>https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/i-am-back.33641/</link> <guid isPermaLink="false">33641</guid> <author>invalid@example.com (moon-buddy)</author> <category domain="https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?forums/backup-archive-discussion.8/"><![CDATA[Backup / Archive Discussion]]></category> <dc:creator>moon-buddy</dc:creator> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Been inactive for sometime since we switched to Veeam and Networker. But the experience with the latter was bad with a Legacy System.<br /><br />Guess what? Back to TSM for that one Legacy System!</div>]]></content:encoded> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> </channel></rss> If you would like to create a banner that links to this page (i.e. this validation result), do the following:
Download the "valid RSS" banner.
Upload the image to your own server. (This step is important. Please do not link directly to the image on this server.)
Add this HTML to your page (change the image src attribute if necessary):
If you would like to create a text link instead, here is the URL you can use:
http://www.feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=https%3A//adsm.org/forum/index.php%3Fforums/-/index.rss
