<fvdoc>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<div id='message'>
<p>Use of extension attribute on RSS 2.0 core element: <code>(namespace,name)</code></p>
</div>
<div id='explanation'>
<p>While the original RSS 2.0 specification only <a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html#extendingRss">explicitly allows arbitrary namespace qualified <em>elements</em> to be defined</a>, it is silent on the permissibility of arbitrary namespace qualified <em>attributes</em> on core elements.
In June of 2007, the RSS Advisory Board <a href="http://www.rssboard.org/news/171/rss-20-specification-version-209">approved a clarification</a> authorizing such use.  Without stating a reason, Harvard had previously stopped accepting updates from the RSS Advisory Board.</p>
<p>Here are a few links to prior discussions on the topic:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html#extendingRss">Harvard spec</a>, <a href="http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification#extendingRss">RSS Board spec</a></li>
<li>Dave Winer:
<a href="http://www.scripting.com/2002/09/06.html#When:10:56:56AM">Sep 6, 2002</a></li>
<li>Randy Charles Morin:
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/943">Oct 3</a>,
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/950">Oct 3</a>,
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/955">Oct 4</a>,
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/1311">May 20, 2007</a></li>
<li>Rogers Cadenhead:
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/949">Oct 3</a>,
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/951">Oct 3</a>,
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/953">Oct 3</a>,
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/956">Oct 5, 2006</a>,
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/1314">May 21</a>,
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/1316">May 21</a>,
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/1317">May 21, 2007</a>
<a href="http://groups.google.com/group/feedvalidator-users/browse_thread/thread/4352bb9a1b488ea5/4961e351bea38186?#4961e351bea38186">March 11, 2008</a></li>
<li>Alan Dean:
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/1393">May 27, 2007</a></li>
<li>James Holderness:
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/message/1427">May 28, 2007</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id='solution'>
<p>As no known problems have arisen as of yet from the use of namespace
qualified attributes, no action may be needed; however if there are equal
or better alternatives (such as the use of sibling namespace qualified elements), you might consider using them instead.</p>
<p>Alternately, by explictly adopting the value of the <a href="http://www.rssboard.org/rss-profile#element-channel-docs"><code>&lt;docs&gt;</code></a> element specified in the RSS Advisory Board's version of the specification, you are indicating that you are relying on the specification and profile published by the <a href="http://www.rssboard.org/">RSS Advisory Board</a>.  If the Feed Validator detects such an usage, it will omit this warning message</p>
</div>
</div>
</fvdoc>

