[Valid RSS] This is a valid RSS feed.


This feed is valid, but interoperability with the widest range of feed readers could be improved by implementing the following recommendations.


  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
  2. <!-- RSS generation done by OrgSpace NewsLog 1.86 on Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:44:25 GMT -->
  3. <rss version="2.0">
  4. <channel>
  5.  <title>Toward a Unified Metaphysical Understanding</title>
  6.  <language>en</language>
  7.  <link></link>
  8.  <description>Toward a System Theoretic Metaphysics</description>
  9.  <h:history xmlns:h="">
  10.    <h:overwrite/>
  11.  </h:history>
  12.  
  19.  <managingEditor>[email protected]</managingEditor>
  20.  <webMaster>[email protected]</webMaster>
  21.  <copyright>No Copyright</copyright>
  22.  <generator>OrgSpace NewsLog 1.86</generator>
  23.  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 8 Dec 2013 20:43:35 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  24.  <pubDate>Sun, 8 Dec 2013 20:43:35 GMT</pubDate>
  25.  <docs></docs>
  26.  <ttl>180</ttl>
  27.  <item>
  28.   <title>Motivating and Clarifying the Paradigm Shift at the Heart of Science</title>
  29.   <link></link>
  30.   <description>here is a fundamental inconsistency at the core of the scientific method / world-view that makes it unable to comprehend quantum mechanics (which seems paradoxical due to the inconsistency) nor can it comprehend consciousness or spirituality.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; have been identifying, explaining and challenging this inconsistency in a series of articles to help motivate the paradigm shift that will eventually make quantum mechanics understandable as well as making research into consciousness and spirituality understandable to modern science and recognised as vitally important.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;here is an entry point here: &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x1_000550-000138_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;f what  say is correct, which it seems to be, then these documents point towards the possibility for a radical paradigm shift!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ass on the good news if you know people who would be interested, the more people who help figure this out, the sooner and the clearer the shift will be. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;specially people interested in the interface between science, consciousness and spirituality. s well as the hard problem of consciousness, psi-phenomena, scientific realist interpretation of quantum mechanics, cybernetic interpretation of quantum mechanics, virtual realism, virtual reality hypothesis, simulation hypothesis, computational metaphysics, reinterpretation of ancient mystic wisdom, etc... t&#039;s all connected!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;njoy :)</description>
  31.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  32.   <pubDate>Sun, 8 Dec 2013 20:43:35 GMT</pubDate>
  33.   <category>Articles</category>
  34.   <category>awakening</category>
  35.   <category>csr</category>
  36.   <category>holistic science</category>
  37.   <category>quantum</category>
  38.  </item>
  39.  <item>
  40.   <title>What is the highest perceived benefit or aspiration of my Life?</title>
  41.   <link></link>
  42.   <description>&lt;&gt;nly a few hours ago the  hing urged me to commit to my highest&lt;br/&gt;aspiration and to announce my intention. t said &quot;&lt;&gt;ake known&lt;br/&gt;the arrival of a message from heaven and announce it at the arth&lt;br/&gt;altar. f you don&#039;t deliver your important message you will be cut&lt;br/&gt;off and isolated. all out. ell us now. ow!&lt;/&gt;&quot; hen along&lt;br/&gt;comes an invitation to do so on acebook, which motivated this... :) &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;o, what is the highest&lt;br/&gt;perceived benefit or aspiration of my ife? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;more &amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
  43.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  44.   <pubDate>Tue, 3 Dec 2013 02:25:56 GMT</pubDate>
  45.   <category>Articles</category>
  46.   <category>awakening</category>
  47.   <category>conditioning</category>
  48.   <category>csr</category>
  49.   <category>holistic science</category>
  50.   <category>i_ching</category>
  51.   <category>knowledge</category>
  52.   <category>quantum</category>
  53.   <category>smn</category>
  54.  </item>
  55.  <item>
  56.   <title>Cognitive Repression in Physics - Reasons for the Entrenched Culture of Denial</title>
  57.   <link></link>
  58.   <description>he quotes below discuss reasons for the entrenched culture of denial within physics (as well and philosophy and science in general) regarding the consequences that quantum mechanics has for naive realism ( classical objectivism).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;fter more than 50 years (now over 80 years) of unquestionable success as a theory, questions about the interpretation of quantum mechanics continue to plague both physicists and philosophers. t is argued here that discussions about the meaning of quantum mechanics remain stymied as a result of the failure of physicists to formulate a cognitive paradigm adequate to their theory. he conventional interpretations which they offer can be seen as inadequate in one of two ways  implicitly, they retain one or the other of the two basic tenets of classical physics, the objectivity or the knowability of nature. his, it is argued, can be viewed as a form of cognitive repression of knowledge acquired, but not yet assimilated.  psychological explanation for the persistence of classical beliefs is proposed...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;iaget has invited the comparison between the historical development of scientific thought and the cognitive development of the child. oth, it is suggested, proceed through the emergence of discrete stages of structural organization, each stage brings with it new possibilities of conceptual integration, and concurrently, the possibility of a verbal articulation of the new level of organization perceived. rior to the establishment of a new conceptual structure, knowledge already present in nonverbal forms (in e.g., sensorimotor rather than representation schemes) finds no avenue of expression, and, to the extent that it jars with the earlier established structures, demands cognitive repression. iaget &#91;1&#93; tells us that an action schema which &quot;cannot be integrated into the system of conscious concepts is eliminated... (and) repressed from conscious territory before it has penetrated there in any conceptualized form.&quot; aught in a transition between stages, the child, when pressed to articulate perceptions requiring cognitive structures which are not yet available, displays confusion, denial and avoidance - a disequilibrium strikingly reminiscent of the mechanism of affective repression.&quot; (ognitive repression in contemporary physics, velyn ox eller, &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x1_000550-000136_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;;/a&gt;)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;here exists a cognitive repression of the interpretation problem by the majority of physicists. or that majority the questions concerning the meaning of quantum mechanics are answered once and for all by the openhagen interpretation, and all further inquiry is rejected as a sign that the inquirer does not understand the topic. urther questions are called &quot;only philosophical&quot; and thus not befitting a physicist. ut if one inquires in depth what the openhagen interpretation says one gets a variety of different answers. ccording to ox-eller this, too, is a sign for evasion, whereby what is evaded is the necessity of a new cognitive structure which differs radically from the existing one. ox-eller calls the old structure classical objectivism. o her, the confusion concerning the interpretation of quantum mechanics exists, thus, in the attempt to retain one or more components of the classical position. hile this may be as it is;  suggest that the search for interpretations different from the openhagen interpretation very often is motivated by trying to evade its radical consequences, that is, an act of cognitive repression on the part of the proposers.&quot; (n the nterpretation and hilosophical oundation of uantum echanics, nton eilinger, &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x2_000550-000136_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;;/a&gt;)</description>
  59.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  60.   <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 06:17:23 GMT</pubDate>
  61.   <category>Articles</category>
  62.   <category>csr</category>
  63.   <category>quantum</category>
  64.   <category>quotes</category>
  65.  </item>
  66.  <item>
  67.   <title>The world-view arising from my work</title>
  68.   <link></link>
  69.   <description>&lt;&gt;hen one sufficiently overcomes the habit of naive realism one can&lt;br/&gt;coherently understand the nature of reality rather than remain&lt;br/&gt;trapped in a self-reproducing closed loop of unconscious assumptions&lt;br/&gt;and resulting misunderstandings. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt; coherent understanding can be attained personally and also&lt;br/&gt;examined scientifically.  personal understanding will transform&lt;br/&gt;one&#039;s life.  scientific understanding will transform civilisation. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;&gt;he main features of a coherent understanding:&lt;/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;&gt;eality is that which perceives rather than that which is&lt;br/&gt;perceived. he objects of perception are not objective because they&lt;br/&gt;depend on how we perceive them. he objective reality is the stream&lt;br/&gt;of awareness within which the objects of perception arise and which&lt;br/&gt;is our true self. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;&gt;e have experiences of &quot;being in a world&quot;, which is&lt;br/&gt;how the situation appears from our perspective. owever those&lt;br/&gt;appearances do not reveal the true nature of reality, just as&lt;br/&gt;experiences of a  game world do not reveal its true nature to be&lt;br/&gt;computation. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;&gt;here are underlying processes that animate our stream of&lt;br/&gt;awareness and give rise to the appearances that we apprehend. hese&lt;br/&gt;processes are that by which we perceive and cannot be apprehended as&lt;br/&gt;objects of perception, thus they themselves seem unmanifest and&lt;br/&gt;abstract. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt; =&quot;margin-bottom: 0cm&quot;&gt;ll manifest forms are inferred to&lt;br/&gt;exist from our perceptions, however they have no independent&lt;br/&gt;self-nature. ence the ideas of matter and a physical universe are&lt;br/&gt;myths. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;&gt;he underlying processes animate all systems and enable them&lt;br/&gt;to experience, react and thereby interact. ll system interactions&lt;br/&gt;are driven by reciprocal experiences and there are no inanimate&lt;br/&gt;systems. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;&gt;he underlying processes that enable our individual streams&lt;br/&gt;of awareness are part of a unified process that animates everything.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;&gt;here is a global coherence to this unified process, which&lt;br/&gt;imparts a global coherence to the realm of manifest forms. hus no&lt;br/&gt;event is local, every event is a &#039;movement&#039; of the entire cosmos. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;&gt;e can operate via sensory perceptions and thereby exert&lt;br/&gt;influence locally, or we can operate via the inner-most animating&lt;br/&gt;process &#039;within&#039; us and thereby exert influence globally or&lt;br/&gt;remotely. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;&gt;ur individual state of being (both body and mind) arises&lt;br/&gt;from the many levels of interacting sub-systems that comprise us. f&lt;br/&gt;these sub-system interactions are dysfunctional we suffer.&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;&gt;ur interactions and relationships integrate us into many&lt;br/&gt;levels of super-systems (groups and organisations) that comprise&lt;br/&gt;society as a whole. he collective state of being emerges from this&lt;br/&gt;integration. f our interactions are dysfunctional the emergent&lt;br/&gt;collective suffers.&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;&gt;he main results of the work from which this world-view arises can be found&lt;br/&gt;here &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0_000550-000135_outside_link&quot;&gt;;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;</description>
  70.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  71.   <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:00:16 GMT</pubDate>
  72.   <category>Articles</category>
  73.   <category>awakening</category>
  74.   <category>csr</category>
  75.   <category>holistic science</category>
  76.  </item>
  77.  <item>
  78.   <title>Motivation behind my work</title>
  79.   <link></link>
  80.   <description>y initial motivation was the need to resolve the tension between my rational and spiritual sides. nce that was eased my attention also turned to the civilisation-wide tension between science and spirituality.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;here is so much needless suffering and destruction that arises from misguided sciences, misguided religions, the conflict between them all and the resulting confusions and dysfunctions that permeate our cultures and minds.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; really believe that this tension can eventually be resolved and out of that will arise a unified science/spirituality that will have a lasting positive influence on our whole civilisation; so profound that we can barely even imagine what it will be like from our current vantage point.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;here are so many people contributing in different ways to this process of unification at present and my greatest hope is to serve some useful role in that effort...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;here is this hope,  cannot promise you whether or when it will be realized - that the mechanistic paradigm, with all its implications in science as well as in society and our own private life, will be replaced by an organismic or systems paradigm that will offer new pathways for our presently schizophrenic and self-destructive civilization.&quot; (udwig von ertalanffy, ounder of general systems theory)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;chizophrenia seems to be a problem where there is no means for thoughts to be coherently &#039;grounded&#039; in truth or reality, hence the tension of confusion builds upon itself creating more confusion and running out of control.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;f the wikipedia description is interpreted as applying to our civilisation rather than an individual person it is surprisingly relevant to our current situation as reflected in politics, media, social breakdown, etc:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;chizophrenia is a mental disorder characterized by a breakdown of thought processes and by impaired emotional responses. ommon symptoms are delusions including paranoia and hallucinations, disorganized thinking and a lack of emotional intelligence. t is accompanied by significant social dysfunction. he onset of symptoms typically occurs in young adulthood.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x1_000550-000134_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;n the case of our civilisation  would propose that the core confusion is nave realism, which gives rise to numerous other confusions such as exoteric religion, empirical science, mechanistic views of human nature, oppressive legal and social systems, entrenched struggle for dominance over others, etc. hese reinforce the confusions and generate vast amounts of tension throughout civilisation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; explain this in more detail in &quot;implified natomy of the lobal ystemic risis and ow to eal ivilisation&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x2_000550-000134_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;;/a&gt;</description>
  81.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  82.   <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:47:20 GMT</pubDate>
  83.   <category>Articles</category>
  84.   <category>awakening</category>
  85.   <category>conditioning</category>
  86.   <category>csr</category>
  87.   <category>ego</category>
  88.   <category>holistic science</category>
  89.  </item>
  90.  <item>
  91.   <title>Quantum Mechanics, Na├»ve Realism, Scientific Realism, Abstraction and Reality</title>
  92.   <link></link>
  93.   <description> was recently asked: &quot;s  in its abstract mathematical proceedure that applies to particles, and just abstract conceptualisations, not considered naive realism?&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;o, it is called scientific realism because it claims that aspects of reality can be known scientifically. cientific realism can be nave realist, for example via claims that particles are real. his is nave realist because it is based on the assumption that that which is portrayed by our observations is real.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;owever in the case of  it is not nave realist - it is in fact the antithesis of nave realism because it claims that the observables that we apprehend are not in any way objective, they are created in the act of observing and are thus totally dependent on how we observe. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;hus  claims that anything that is portrayed by our experiences cannot be objectively real - whilst nave realism claims that that which is portrayed by our experiences is objectively real. he two are diametrically opposed.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; is realist because it claims that that which is represented by wavefunctions are real. .e. they exist independently of our observations - in fact they are inherently unobservable. henever we try to observe them what we experience are the &#039;observables&#039; that are created in the act of observing.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;o  doesn&#039;t claim that particles or waves are real, these are just observables. t is that which is represented by wavefunctions that are real and which give rise to observations of either a particle or a wave depending on how we observe it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;  doesn&#039;t claim that the mathematical proceedures are real - these are just symbolic models via which we comprehend quantum systems.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ence this type of realism is scientific realism because the things that are considered to be real can only be apprehended by the mind via &#039;abstract&#039; scientific conceptualisations. he fact that these are &#039;abstract&#039; doesn&#039;t imply that they are unreal - in fact it implies the opposite. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ithin a  nave realist paradigm &#039;abstract&#039; means &#039;unreal&#039; because it can never be portrayed by the content of an experience no matter how augmented that experience may be (e.g. by microscopes or telescopes or particle accelerators etc). ue to nave realism we are in the habit of thinking that only the things portrayed by our experiences can be real and that everything else is abstract and unreal. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;owever, when we step away from nave realism and seriously consider the role of experience we realise that if experience is fundamental and not just an anomaly then that which is most real must underlie our ability to experience. urthermore, &quot;that which underlies our ability to experience&quot; cannot be &quot;that which is portrayed by our experiences&quot;. hus that which can be observed is unreal and that which is real would seem &#039;abstract&#039; because it can never be observed. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;n other words, to use a metaphor, reality is the sight within seeing rather than that which is seen. ence the most real is the most abstract.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; it is very rare to find a coherent discussion of the non-nave realist nature of . ost discussions try to introduce nave realist features or apply it within a nave realist context.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;his is because over the past 80 or so years there have only been a handful of physicists who could think outside of nave realism. hus the standard attitude is that we should focus on the world that we know via nave realism (i.e. the physical universe) and we should use  to make calculation about that world. eanwhile we should avoid any attempts to think about what  really means, i.e. what it is really saying about the nature of reality.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;hus it has been declared over and over that  makes no sense and that attempts to think deeply about it will drive you insane. his attitude arises because a nave realist cannot conceive that there is anything beyond nave realism, thus someone who thinks outside of nave realism must be insane, or so it seems to them.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;here are now a few physicists who are beginning to see beyond nave realism, but the vast majority of physics and science in general is still thoroughly nave realist.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ere is a very short article that  wrote for a fringe science newsletter regarding the paradigm shift that is slowly emerging within physics: &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x1_000550-000133_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; more detailed analysis is conducted here: &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x2_000550-000133_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ote: in order to conduct this research  had to break away from habitual ways of thinking by dropping out of academia, however this means that this work has no way of being heard by academics or others engaged in similar work. f these ideas resonate with you then you can help by bringing it to their attention. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;hank you for listening and helping!  hope that it helps you as much as it has helped me to develop a clearer understanding of the nature of reality.</description>
  94.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  95.   <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:25:34 GMT</pubDate>
  96.   <category>Articles</category>
  97.   <category>csr</category>
  98.   <category>holistic science</category>
  99.   <category>knowledge</category>
  100.   <category>quantum</category>
  101.   <category>smn</category>
  102.  </item>
  103.  <item>
  104.   <title>Reformulation of the Virtual Reality Hypothesis</title>
  105.   <link></link>
  106.   <description>ere is a bottom up reformulation of the philosophical foundations of the virtual reality hypothesis, i.e. the idea that we could be living in a virtual reality.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; have noticed over the years that there are many subtle confusions that arise when people try to approach this subject, myself included. ven for those who are cautious and sincere in their approach, there are unexpected pitfalls that can cause misunderstandings.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;his reformulation attempts to elucidate and minimise the impact of those pitfalls in order to create a coherent foundation from which to approach the topic. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;t is still a work in progress and any feedback or constructive criticism would be much appreciated&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x1_000550-000132_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;he bjective nformation rocesses &amp; irtual ubjective xperiences ypothesis&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;</description>
  107.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  108.   <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 19:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
  109.   <category>Articles</category>
  110.   <category>holistic science</category>
  111.   <category>smn</category>
  112.  </item>
  113.  <item>
  114.   <title>What is a differend?</title>
  115.   <link></link>
  116.   <description> differend is a form of invisible oppression. t was first examined in the context of a post-modern analysis of the judicial system and oppressed classes, however it applies to all human interactions. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; damage occurs when one being is harmed by another. any kinds of damage may be litigated against, taken to court, proven, and compensated for. ut sometimes a damage cannot be expressed, whether because the being who undergoes the damage is unable to speak in a language to which the judges will listen (as in the case of animals, children, the mentally ill, the dead), or because the judges are the ones who have done the damage, whether directly or through affiliation, or because the testimony of the one damaged is deprived of authority for whatever reason. uch a scenario is called a differend, and the person who suffers from both a damage and a loss of the ability to prove it is a victim...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;... subjects are constituted through exclusion, that is, through the creation of a domain of deauthorized subjects, presubjects, figures of abjection, populations erased from view. t is a question of who qualifies as a who and hence of who can speak, whose testimony will be heard. he silencing of certain voices, the effacement of certain persons sufferings, is achieved through the denial that they are whos, or through their abjection, and this makes violence to them permissible, indeed invisible.;br/&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;more &amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
  117.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  118.   <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:25:30 GMT</pubDate>
  119.   <category>Articles</category>
  120.   <category>conditioning</category>
  121.  </item>
  122.  <item>
  123.   <title>Freedom, Slavery and Fundamental Limits on the Growth of Civilisation</title>
  124.   <link></link>
  125.   <description>&lt;img src=&quot;; title=&quot;&quot;  hspace=&quot;0&quot; vspace=&quot;2&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;  alt=&quot;picture&quot; /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&quot;... for some reason it appears weve given up our freedom to varying degrees in exchange for something. ut in exchange for what? ecurity? cceptance? ase? t sure appears that way. ut how did this come about? ... ooking at the contrived and extremely controlling political and economic structure of our planets various societies and the miserable state of most of its inhabitants, its clear something is seriously wrong.&quot; (oes umanity ven ant reedom?;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;t is clear that in countless overt and subtle ways we are losing our freedom. hy is this happening? nd importantly, how far might this proceed and how can we *effectively* resist it?&lt;br/&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;more &amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
  126.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  127.   <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:38:39 GMT</pubDate>
  128.   <category>Articles</category>
  129.   <category>conditioning</category>
  130.   <category>csr</category>
  131.   <category>ego</category>
  132.   <category>meta-system-transition</category>
  133.  </item>
  134.  <item>
  135.   <title>What is the relationship between processes and systems?</title>
  136.   <link></link>
  137.   <description> happened to answer a question on inkedin and thought &#039;d share it...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;uestion:&lt;br/&gt;as someone an idea , about the relationship between a process and system? is it the same ? what are the differences?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;nswer:&lt;br/&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;more &amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
  138.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  139.   <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 19:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
  140.   <category>Articles</category>
  141.   <category>smn</category>
  142.  </item>
  143. </channel>
  144. </rss>

If you would like to create a banner that links to this page (i.e. this validation result), do the following:

  1. Download the "valid RSS" banner.

  2. Upload the image to your own server. (This step is important. Please do not link directly to the image on this server.)

  3. Add this HTML to your page (change the image src attribute if necessary):

If you would like to create a text link instead, here is the URL you can use:

Copyright © 2002-9 Sam Ruby, Mark Pilgrim, Joseph Walton, and Phil Ringnalda