[Valid RSS] This is a valid RSS feed.


This feed is valid, but interoperability with the widest range of feed readers could be improved by implementing the following recommendations.


  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
  2. <!-- RSS generation done by OrgSpace NewsLog 1.86 on Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:05:21 GMT -->
  3. <rss version="2.0">
  4. <channel>
  5.  <title>Ming the Mechanic</title>
  6.  <language>en</language>
  7.  <link></link>
  8.  <description>An old rigid civilization is reluctantly dying. Something new, open, free and exciting is waking up.</description>
  9.  <h:history xmlns:h="">
  10.    <h:overwrite/>
  11.  </h:history>
  12.  
  19.  <webMaster>[email protected]</webMaster>
  20.  <copyright>Primarily Public Domain</copyright>
  21.  <generator>OrgSpace NewsLog 1.86</generator>
  22.  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 8 Nov 2014 04:12:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  23.  <pubDate>Sat, 8 Nov 2014 04:12:50 GMT</pubDate>
  24.  <docs></docs>
  25.  <ttl>180</ttl>
  26.  <item>
  27.   <title>Welcome to the 5th dimension</title>
  28.   <link></link>
  29.   <description>&lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;; title=&quot;&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;20&quot; vspace=&quot;10&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;  alt=&quot;picture&quot; /&gt; &lt;/a&gt; have for many years held on to a particular model of human conscious evolution that  heard once. ead about it in my article here: &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x1_000010-001998_outside_nl&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; &gt;he ingularity and the ifth imension&lt;/a&gt;. t lays out how humanity is in the process of moving from the 3rd to the 5th &quot;dimension&quot; and what that actually means. nd, note that, as  mentioned, it doesn&#039;t have to be taken as some new age spiritual kind of thing, but can just as well be a model of technological progress. and the required evolution in consciousness to deal with it. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;riefly, 3 was where things got done by getting the inspiration for them, by thinking about it, by getting in the mood, and then working hard on doing what it takes. pirit -&gt; hought -&gt; motion -&gt; ffort -&gt; anifestation. he old-fashioned idea of: if you put your mind to it and work hard, you&#039;ll see some rewards in life, after quite a few years. oing big things required large investments of physical effort and time.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;4 speeded things up quite a bit. ou still need inspiration and thought, but things start happening already when you&#039;re really in the mood, and you get other people in the right mood. hink advertising and think nternet overnight dot-com successes. pirit -&gt; hought -&gt; motion -&gt; anifestation. ow much work went into something is no longer such an important factor. acebook is worth more than twice as much as eneral otors, even though it was a much much smaller effort. t the same time, what is there can crumble very quickly, when suddenly people feel different about it. he rab pring. owerful centralized regimes can be toppled almost overnight.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ote that &#039;m saying, more or less, that we already went into that phase. t is more or less the epoch of the nternet.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ut what about the next step? n case you follow me in imagining that something like this actually is going on.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;5 is a further acceleration. hings happen when thought becomes coherent. t no longer matters so much what people really feel or what they actually are doing, or for that matter, what actually is there. he mere thought sends things off into a different direction. pirit-&gt;hought-&gt;anifestation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ou might have interpreted that as instant magic, as if stuff would materialize in thin air the moment you think about it, but there&#039;s no reason to take it quite as literally. ust like the 4 nternet ge indeed changed things, but not to the degree that your feelings made things appear out of thin air. t is not direct creation as much at it is attraction. t is an organizing principle, not godly superpowers. ith the arrival of the nternet, we started being attracted to what was exciting, or what was horrible, more than to what took lots of time and effort to build. ikewise, in the next phase, we organize ourselves based on something else, on clarity of thought, &#039;d say.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;o, 5, what might that actually look like?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; had provided some warnings about us totally not being ready for it, that we&#039;d go crazy and/or blow ourselves up really quickly. nd in some ways we are, but not quite as dramatically as  laid it out. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;roup insanity has become a lot more apparent. arge groups of people believe themselves to live in realities that to most others are stark raving lunacy.  olitics provides plenty of illustration. his is quite different from different people simply having different beliefs. t is not just that some people prefer more spending on social programs and others prefer strengthening private initiatives. t is that the other guys seemingly are living in the world of ooney unes and are acting en masse as if it is totally real to them. nd they in turn imagine some outrageous things about the folks you hang out with, seeing you as totally unable to deal with things as they really are.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;t isn&#039;t just that some people go to church on undays and others on aturdays, and some people don&#039;t like pork. t is that groups emerge seemingly overnight that get a lot of people to believe that everybody who doesn&#039;t believe the same things as them should be beheaded. ote that the same people will be willing and able to argue logically for that belief. r think about the rather large group of people who believe that everybody who believes anything that is spiritual, metaphysical or religious is certifiably insane and there&#039;s absolutely nothing to discuss about it, they should just stop.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ou&#039;ll notice that for a lot of those groups, a certain system of thought is what they aggregate around, and it is of little or no interest to try to calibrate their beliefs with what actually is there. ot that they don&#039;t calibrate against anything, but what they calibrate against is collections of thoughts, not what feels right, not what actually happened, not what anybody else might have to say.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;e&#039;re seeing a split into many different realities. ealities that hardly overlap. eople are living in worlds with drastically different rules and importances. n many respects, most of those worlds are fantasy worlds. eople in them are stuck in the matrix, not having much of a concept of what is beyond it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;nd you&#039;ll notice that, at the same time, we&#039;re at the brink of disaster. ut of control climate change, linked to ever accelerating pollution and resource depletion. umanity might quite possibly make itself extinct in less than another century. nd in a quite different way than back in the 1960s where it looked a lot like humanity might kill itself in global nuclear war. ack then, most people were very focused on the realities of the sides of the conflict. oday a lot of people will argue that the problem is not even there, and the important problems are some totally different things, like gay marriage or having the right religion.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;s predicted, luckily not everybody has gone insane. he majority probably has. h, not necessarily in a &quot;behead the infidels!!!&quot; kind of way. or a lot of people, their insanity is simply to stay stuck in a little world where they have a job, and they have a family, and they stay busy with those things, and with the news and watching youtube, and with planning their retirement, and they don&#039;t really know that they&#039;re in a cabin on the itanic and the captain is asleep. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;o, how do we get used to it? ow do we get on top of it? ow do we survive it?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;n the transition to the 4 nternet ge, there were some adjustments to make. he world became less stable and less solid, but there were still some guidelines for doing well. on&#039;t count on a job for life. earn to market yourself. e interesting. ommunicate. on&#039;t bother to keep up with everything that goes on. eep a finger in the air to notice which way the wind is blowing. f you need something, and you have your antennas out, it will probably come to you. o need to hoard it all in the basement in advance. o what you feel is right, not what your parents told you you were supposed to do.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#039;m not sure what the 5 world should be called. ot sure either what the principles are for surviving it, as we haven&#039;t done so yet. ut, some possibilities:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;here are no right thoughts. ou need the flexibility to have options in how you think and be able to choose between them based on what works best. f you have only one way of thinking about something, you&#039;re stuck.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;nformation isn&#039;t reality, and should never be accepted at face value. f somebody tells you something, you need to be ready to evaluate whether that works for you, whether it can be verified against something observable, and whether it feels right to you. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;o get anything to happen, you need to be able to name what it is. t needs to be a complete thought. ots of other things are not needed. t doesn&#039;t have to be realistic or elaborately worked out, but it does have to be clear.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ou have to be conscious of what you&#039;re thinking. ou need to have a choice about it. f you merely go along with what is presented to you, you&#039;ll live in somebody else&#039;s fantasy world. f you consciously choose, you can change worlds.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;he world comes together in the right way if you deliberately network the elements you choose to have in it. here&#039;s no ideology or group or method you simply can join which will make it all alright without you having to think. ou have to think about every single piece. hink doesn&#039;t mean to repeat or rephrase something you&#039;ve heard. t means to be conscious.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;hinking isn&#039;t some after-the-fact analysis. hinking is a choice. ou can only choose if there are options to choose from, or you create options. ot fake manufactured options of what brand of shampoo to buy, but options of actually different avenues to take. t is only successful if you calibrate against the results somehow.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;elcome to the 5th dimension!  hope we make it.</description>
  30.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  31.   <pubDate>Sat, 8 Nov 2014 04:12:50 GMT</pubDate>
  32.   <category>Patterns</category>
  33.  </item>
  34.  <item>
  35.   <title>The conversation of work</title>
  36.   <link></link>
  37.   <description>&lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;; title=&quot;&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;20&quot; vspace=&quot;10&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;  alt=&quot;picture&quot; /&gt; &lt;/a&gt;eing a computer programmer has been one of my main sources of income for the past more than 30 years. ore than half of it freelance, doing projects for people. &#039;ve noticed an important difference between very successful projects and not so successful projects.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;s there anybody to have the conversation with?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;oftware development is a type of knowledge work. ey parts of the work is to get to understand the problems at hand and inventing solutions for them. ecause what needs to be done generally speaking isn&#039;t known in advance, it is being discovered along the way. odern approaches to development, such as the gile principles, take that into account by bringing all the stake holders together and engaging them in frequent conversation, and by progressing very incrementally.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ut many people still mistakenly think that software is something mechanical. ou just need to specify clearly what you want, and then the programmers need to just go and code it. hat was how it was generally perceived a few decades ago. nalysts would write the specs for what needed to be done, and then we just needed to apply enough programmer man-hours to implement it. t never worked well, because once the programmers came back with the work, 6 months or a year later, and it was shown to the people who asked for it, they usually would realize that it wasn&#039;t really want they wanted, and they&#039;ll ask for changes. nd the analysts would revise the specs and the programmers went off and did the work again, and came back some months later. hat used to be the idea, but it is ridiculously wasteful and ineffective, so the approach has mostly been abandoned. owever, that doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that it is easy to persuade clients that they need to be engaged in the process. ometimes it is a very hard sell.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;he most successful software projects &#039;ve done have involved a continuous conversation with some other people, often daily. hat doesn&#039;t mean long meetings. owadays it means brief asynchronous instant messages, and occasional short face to face meetings. oesn&#039;t have to be with everybody, but it should certainly include somebody who has a sense of what is needed, i.e. somebody who represents the interests of the end users. nd, strangely, that&#039;s occasionally very hard to find, and it might make the project suffer greatly. eaning, it will take a lot longer, be more costly, and most likely not deliver what really is needed. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;he problem is in part that complexity is hard to understand. omplexity is something dynamic and alive that can&#039;t be all understood in advance, but that has emerging properties, which might or might not be the desired ones. his is as compared to stuff that is merely complicated. f it is complicated it might well be possible to make a big assembly diagram and have somebody simply follow the instructions. hat works with many things, like kea furniture, but not with others, like software. r communication. ou can&#039;t just outsource an organization&#039;s social media relations and expect that it will work well. here needs to be somebody home who participates in a process of finding what works.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;o, a note to myself: ace the issue up front. on&#039;t accept a development project that the client isn&#039;t themselves taking part in. f they just want to tell you what they want and hear from you how long time it will take, walk the other way.</description>
  38.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  39.   <pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2014 21:33:29 GMT</pubDate>
  40.   <category>Programming</category>
  41.  </item>
  42.  <item>
  43.   <title>Good products</title>
  44.   <link></link>
  45.   <description>&lt;object width=&quot;420&quot; height=&quot;315&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin:0 10px 10px 0;&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;//;hl=en_&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowullcreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowscriptaccess&quot; value=&quot;always&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;//;hl=en_&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;420&quot; height=&quot;315&quot; allowscriptaccess=&quot;always&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;f we simply could keep track of which stuff is good and which is bad, things would be much easier. e aren&#039;t good at it, and for that matter, the manufacturers of stuff don&#039;t help us very much. n this video  present a hristmas present, a wine bottle opener, which just happens to work really well. t is ergonomic, the motor is strong, the battery lasts for a long time, the foil cutter actually does the job. ut it is a no name brand hinese thing, so it is hard for me to even recommend it to anybody.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;fter some search, and some help from a friend,  figured out that my wine opener is from &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0_000010-001996_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ongguan eneit ommodity o.&lt;/a&gt;. nfortunately they don&#039;t have that exact same model any longer. as it a fluke that they made a great product, or do they do it consistently?  don&#039;t know.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  46.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  47.   <pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2014 03:43:22 GMT</pubDate>
  48.   <category>Culture</category>
  49.  </item>
  50.  <item>
  51.   <title>You must be an expert by now</title>
  52.   <link></link>
  53.   <description>&lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;; title=&quot;&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;20&quot; vspace=&quot;10&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;  alt=&quot;picture&quot; /&gt; &lt;/a&gt;y wife and  don&#039;t always see eye to eye on what it takes to learn something.  will quite readily accept that it might take years of hard work to acquire a particular skill. he will tend to think that an activity better start paying off right away, or it isn&#039;t really worth it. e both have some kind of point. ers being in part that learning might as well be fun and rewarding from the beginning, and there&#039;s nothing noble about suffering through a process that won&#039;t provide a result before much later.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;earning is an important subject to me. &#039;d love to see better learning methods become available all around. &#039;m convinced that many things could be learned many times faster and much more thoroughly, if somebody would manage to understand how we learn, and would construct an approach that provided the required input and feedback. nstead, we&#039;re usually required to listen to somebody talking and look at some examples of the subject matter, and we&#039;re supposed to just learn from that. e do, but usually very slowly.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ntil we have this learning robot that  can plug into, which will provide me instant feedback and just the right amount of repetition and variation, and which teaches the core structure of the matter, not all the random blahblah around it, it will take time. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;eople who&#039;ve mastered a skill or a subject will know very well what kind of very substantial effort it took to get there. ou&#039;re not playing classical violin in front of an audience unless you&#039;ve practiced for years, hours and hours every day. ou wouldn&#039;t be a stage magician with your own show if you hadn&#039;t practiced for thousands of hours to manipulate cards or coins until you do it so well that people don&#039;t see what you actually do. ou won&#039;t be a h.. unless you&#039;ve digested a mountain of research in your particular field and you know pretty much everything that anybody else has said about it. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;eople who aren&#039;t in the process of mastering anything, or who haven&#039;t already done so, would tend to be very unaware of what it takes, and might even be quite likely to ridicule the work. hich is why it often happens out of sight.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;y wife and  take dancing classes and enjoy going out dancing. ut it is also an arena where our differences show up. n most partner dances, it is quite well known that the leaders and the followers have a quite different journey and different learning curve. he followers mostly focus on relaxing and not trying to anticipate what the leader will do. he leader on the other hand must know what to do, must know the sequence of steps and how to lead them and when to do them. hich obviously he can&#039;t do well from day one.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; hate the uncomfortable feeling of being a klutz who doesn&#039;t know what to do in a beginner class. articularly if it seems to be easier for other people. nd &#039;m really not fast at getting something new at first. y approach to keeping up will often be to put in an extra effort, study up on it in my own time, take the beginner class two or three times if  can.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; had started this dance that my wife wasn&#039;t yet doing at the time, est oast wing.  loved it right away, and decided to do what it took to learn it, even though it is considered quite difficult. o,  put in some extra effort, went to weekend workshops in a addition to the regular classes, watched videos, etc. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;nd now, here&#039;s the thing, that wouldn&#039;t go on for more than a few months before my wife would start making remarks like &quot;ou must be an expert by now, with all those classes you&#039;re taking&quot;. r, when &#039;m signing up for another weekend class next month: &quot;o you really need to be an expert?&quot;. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;f  wanted to be an expert and really master something,  should be practicing it for some hours every day. ot some hours every second weekend.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;any well-meaning people will be very interested when a friend or family member starts to learn something new. &quot;ou should give us a show!&quot;, &quot;hen are you going to perform?&quot; two weeks after somebody starts learning to dance or play the violin.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;here are surely activities that might be worth watching even when done by beginners. ost are not. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ome people (alcolm ladwell) say that you need to practice something for 10,000 hours to master it. hat number is completely arbitrary and probably unfounded, but it gives the idea. hat&#039;s something like 40 hours per week for 5 years. nd doing that mindlessly, repeating the same actions over and over, surely wouldn&#039;t do it either. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;any people think they&#039;re not gifted or not able to learn, because they tried something a couple of times and they didn&#039;t succeed. ou know, they tried making a drawing and it wasn&#039;t good. hey obviously have no clue what it would take to succeed. robably to a certain degree it is the fault of a general anti-mastery atmosphere. r, we could say, a need for instant gratification. e celebrate people who&#039;ve mastered fantastic skills, but we usually render the required work completely invisible, leaving the illusion that the mastery somehow was easy or didn&#039;t take much time. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ome people show up for the audition in merican dol or o ou hink ou an ance after having practiced for hours per day for years, and they do great. he show makes it look like they do what they do in a few days. bviously the illusion fools enough people that some people will show up to the same auditions never having practiced anything, thinking they have a chance, and the only chance they get is to look like complete idiots in front of millions of people.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;o, if you should be an expert by now, you should obviously have started years ago and have worked on it every day. t takes a lot of practice. nd not just repetition of stuff one is trying to do, or that one is repeating in the wrong way. t takes attentive exploration of all aspects of what one is trying to learn. etting to understand deeply why one has difficulty with some particular part, and how one can overcome it. nd then moving on to some other part.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ost people who&#039;re really passionate about something, or who are trying to master something, will have a great need to talk about it or think about it. nd, there again, unless they&#039;re surrounded by people who&#039;re passionate about the same thing or learning the same thing, they&#039;ll probably find that others have a very limited patience for this. e&#039;re used to the  format. ure, we&#039;d like to see your audition, and a couple of snapshots of you practicing, and a few soundbites of you talking about your challenges, and then we&#039;d like to see your performance, preferably flawless. ut that&#039;s of course not really what has been going on. gain, they&#039;d have been working on it for years, every day.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#039;m writing in a blog here. logs could be a format for talking about what one really is working on, and others might be interested if they&#039;re on the same path. ut not if they aren&#039;t. f you have a somewhat general blog, like this one, and you suddenly get passionate about something specific, and you start writing about that all the time, you would probably lose most of the audience. or example,  was really into aquaponics a couple of years ago. hat meant that  spent hours every day doing research, trying to solve problems, or constructing things in the garage or in my greenhouse.  have written about that in other places.  could very well have written several posts here every day, but  didn&#039;t, because it would be much too much for most people. ight now &#039;m passionate about dance, and  could write about that every day.  don&#039;t, or  only do it in my private notes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;f you don&#039;t already have it, it would be a good idea to seek out a forum where your passion and your learning actually is welcome, also at great length. hat&#039;s maybe really obvious to some who already have it, but not to others who didn&#039;t know where to look. ou&#039;d want to communicate with people who&#039;re on a similar level of involvement with the subject, or who would like to be. eople immediately around you are not likely to follow you, so you might have to go out of the way to find the others. nd if what you&#039;re into is something really specialized, it is quite possible that you won&#039;t find anybody else in the world who&#039;s deeply into that. on&#039;t let that stop you. ater on, when you&#039;ve succeeded, everybody will show up to congratulate you, including those who didn&#039;t really have the patience for you working so much on it, or who even tried to talk you out of it.</description>
  54.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  55.   <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2014 04:04:07 GMT</pubDate>
  56.   <category>Knowledge</category>
  57.   <category>learning</category>
  58.  </item>
  59.  <item>
  60.   <title>Brevity</title>
  61.   <link></link>
  62.   <description>&lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;; title=&quot;&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;20&quot; vspace=&quot;10&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;  alt=&quot;picture&quot; /&gt; &lt;/a&gt;t some point, a few years ago,  became good at saying wise stuff very concisely. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;t was sort of accidental. he challenge  set myself was to say more things that were quotable. t is a oastmasters principle that one ought to always have some material ready, in case somebody unexpectedly asks you to get up and speak to a crowd. ome stories, some jokes, some unusual facts, some quotes. ne could simply collect some of those when one runs into them, put them on a list, and glance at them once in a while so that one is likely to remember them.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;nd  thought -- quotes --  can&#039;t remember anything &#039;ve said that was quotable. nce in a while other people would quote me on something  had written years ago, and  usually was impressed. ut  couldn&#039;t myself think of anything. o  decided to write it down when  said something that would make a good quote.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ncidentally, witter or acebook are ideal for brief statements. n witter you simply can&#039;t write more than 140 characters, so if one has any hope of writing something memorable and meaningful, it would have to be within that limit. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; was quickly surprised to find that it was quite easy for me to say something quotable.  had just meant to try to catch it when  said something clever, but by doing that,  started mainly writing things that were clever and quotable. hat maybe shouldn&#039;t be surprising, one typically gets what one puts one&#039;s attention on. nyway, the result became that  more or less copied everything  said on witter or acebook to my quote list right away. o, now, several years later there are hundreds and hundreds of entries on it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;t is worth noting that even though my initial motivation was somewhat vain and self-serving, to collect clever things &#039;ve said in order to sound smart and quotable later, it was something else  managed to tap into.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ee,  can&#039;t really come up with something clever on command. f  try to deliberately construct a wise and profound statement,  generally can&#039;t. &#039;d sweat over it and just come up with something mediocre and unoriginal. ecause it is not really about constructing something clever at all. t is more about discovering something.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;he way it works for me is that &#039;m busy with something else and suddenly, bing, an insight pops into my head, fully formed. hat has certainly happened for a long time. hat was new now was that words came along with it.  could just write those words down, a sentence or two, and post them on witter or whatever. nd  would probably pop right back to what  was doing before, having just spent a minute or so noting down or posting that thought.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;he cool thing is that most of those little packets of wisdom could be unpacked to something much larger if necessary. f somebody has a question about it, &#039;d have a lot to say about it, and &#039;d have examples, etc. r any of them could be a whole discussion, or a lecture, or a book, if necessary, and if  had time to write it. r they could just stay brief. hat is very useful about the brief form is that it is enough to remind me of exactly what it is about. o, even years later,  could still unpack it into a speech or an explanation. here&#039;d be nothing to forget, because the initial quote says it all, even if it maybe isn&#039;t clear to most other people. nd it almost always has a built-in integrity and coherence. obody ever catches me in having gotten it wrong.  don&#039;t particularly mean that to brag. &#039;m after all only partially responsible. hose thoughts pop into my head from  don&#039;t know where.  didn&#039;t try to construct them, they don&#039;t represent something  painstakingly have figured out.  can explain them after the fact, though.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;he downside of saying many little things like that is that  might not get around to the bigger and longer and more detailed explanations and articles. nd even though  myself was quite happy with my mini version, and a bunch of people clicked ike on it, &#039;m quite aware that probably most people didn&#039;t quite get what  meant. hey might have entirely misunderstood it, or have at least filled a few of their own fixed ideas into it. he advantage of longer form writing, like blog posts, is that the subject matter can be unfolded and illustrated in a variety of different ways, and it is more likely that the reader gets it and that it becomes real and useful to them. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;o,  will give myself the challenge of also collecting longer treatments of simple ideas  care about.&lt;br/&gt;</description>
  63.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  64.   <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:15:40 GMT</pubDate>
  65.   <category>Knowledge</category>
  66.  </item>
  67.  <item>
  68.   <title>An evolving path</title>
  69.   <link></link>
  70.   <description>&lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;; title=&quot;&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;20&quot; vspace=&quot;10&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;  alt=&quot;picture&quot; /&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&#039;ve spent the last couple of months doing quite different things from what  normally have. &#039;ve been outside, digging in the garden, tinkering, using power tools. nd &#039;ve been studying a bunch of new things  knew nothing about. quaponics, fish, plants, plumping, permaculture, forest gardens, and many sub-subjects of each. ow, this is really quite uncharacteristic. .e. &#039;ve never been interested in any of those things before. ut maybe it is not so uncharacteristic of me to dive deeply into a new subject.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;nd, looking a couple of posts back, &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x1_000010-001992_outside_art&quot; &gt;2011 ccomplishments and 2012 ims&lt;/a&gt;,  notice that this is actually exactly what  said  would do.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;hat is new is that  might be writing more about it. oing more physical things, building stuff, watching nature, surprise, that actually leads to lots of deep things to talk about. ut &#039;ll also just talk about those practical things, without any need for them to be deep. esilient, local, distributed, empowering action has always been part of the subtext here. nd there&#039;s lots of practical stuff it might be a good idea to start paying attention to. </description>
  71.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  72.   <pubDate>Thu, 3 May 2012 04:04:35 GMT</pubDate>
  73.   <category>Diary</category>
  74.  </item>
  75.  <item>
  76.   <title>Intellectual Property</title>
  77.   <link></link>
  78.   <description>&lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;; title=&quot;&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;20&quot; vspace=&quot;10&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;  alt=&quot;picture&quot; /&gt; &lt;/a&gt;here&#039;s no such thing. ertainly it isn&#039;t something you can steal. uite the contrary, it is a license to steal. pecifically, it is a legal construct that gives an exclusive license to one party to stop all other parties from using certain words or certain pictures or certain designs or certain patterns of arranging things, simply because they were the first to claim that they invented those words or pictures, and that they own them. nd the purported owner can then extort money from all the other people, or simply stop them from doing anything that looks like what they did.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;t is a tired, tired old discussion, but intellectual property is not property. t is not in any way the same as when you own a physical object of some kind, and somebody can steal it. t is not even remotely that way, and you should be insulted if anybody suggests it. f you have a car, and somebody steals that car, by removing it from you and taking it into their possession, then obviously you don&#039;t have your car any longer, a car that took quite some resources to acquire, and which took raw materials to build. s opposed to that, with our modern technologies, ideas, words and pictures are extremely easily copied, for almost no cost, while leaving the original completely intact. our car is still there, even if somebody took a picture of it, just like your website is still there, even though somebody saved a copy of it. our car is also still there, even if somebody went to the trouble of building a copy of it. opying is not stealing. ot even close. f you claim so, you&#039;re running some kind of scam.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;he scam of ntellectual roperty is quite similar to how you meet a con artist on the street. hey seem friendly and they might ask you for a favor or invite you to play a little game. nd before you know it, you owe them 100 dollars, and it isn&#039;t quite clear how it happened.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;here&#039;s a lot of apparently friendly ntellectual roperty around. f you turn on the radio, there are dozens of channels playing music non-stop. hey actually broadcast songs over all civilized areas, from high powered emitters. pparently free for anybody to pick up, as long as they have the receiver, which is cheap and ubiquitous. owhere are you presented with any contract that says that you&#039;ll be punished for saving any of this music, or sharing it with a friend. urn on your  and it is the same thing. ozens of channels broadcasting high quality content to you non-stop, for free. he same people broadcast much of this content for free on the nternet. ut if you ever get the idea that you can save some of it for replaying to yourself and your friends, you&#039;re suddenly a criminal, because you didn&#039;t then drive to a store to buy a  or a  with the music or film you wanted to keep.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ntellectual property is like those apples one always hears about at alloween, where some wacko embedded razorblades in them. hey looked like a nice and friendly gift, but if you go off and actually try to eat them, you get hurt. r it is like a crack dealer distributing free samples. eems like a nice and friendly thing to do, but it is a gift you&#039;ll pay for later.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;here are a lot of bogus cover stories you&#039;ll be presented with. t is to support the starving artists and musicians. hey need to be paid for their hard work. t is just that those people are rarely the actual people you&#039;re being asked to pay. ony is not an artist. either is arner rothers. hey are businesses trying to make a profit. f you look into the accounting that applies to the majority of artists or authors that have record deals or publishing contracts, you&#039;ll find that the vast majority of them make nothing whatsoever, or they even have to pay out of their own pocket to be published. he people who make money are the very few really big names. he adonnas and rad itts. ut much more so the media companies. he rest have been scammed as much as you have.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;f you think it is a problem now, it can get much, much worse. hink about patents on . hink about copyrights on 3 wireframe models. hink about big companies using courts to stop people from growing certain things in their gardens and from creating certain objects in their garages. n addition to stopping us from using certain words and certain melodies and certain images and likenesses. hat could be a glorious future of local production and distributed creativity could instead turn into a nightmare dystopia where a few multi-national megacorps have the government backed power to turn off the things you create, or use, or grow, because they &quot;own&quot; them. r have you pay them handsomely for the right to create.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ne possible avenue, to avoid this, is to stay far away from anything that looks like ntellectual roperty, to refuse to use it, to block it, ban it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; new nternet2, free from copyrights and patents and any other kind of  looks like a better and better idea. o,  don&#039;t mean a pirate network for sharing their stuff.  mean a network where intellectual property is banned. e just won&#039;t play their game at all.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;oftware has been created for the purpose of identifying &quot;owned&quot; materials, like music or film. magine using it in reverse in a new nternet. .e. anything that is &quot;owned&quot; will simply not be transported. ot by its owners, not by anybody. t simply won&#039;t go anywhere. obody wants it. n other words:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;f you have intellectual property, please keep it to yourself!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;hich is what should have happened in the first place. e call your bluff. f you made it and you think it is yours alone, fine, keep it. ut don&#039;t let us catch you handing it out as a free sample to anybody that you could hope to later entrap. f you really think it is  photo, keep it to yourself in a shoebox or on your computer. on&#039;t post it to thousands of people on the nternet, and then later claim that they stole it from you. hey didn&#039;t. ou gave it to them. o, don&#039;t, if you don&#039;t want to.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;efty fines would be in order for anybody trying to distribute their own intellectual property in any way. ome number of dollars for each person you knowingly have distributed it to for free would be quite reasonable, if you then later make demands of money for the very same thing.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;o, &#039;m suggesting reversing the game. low the cover off the game when you see it. on&#039;t allow this kind of thing on your networks. t&#039;s a crime.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#039;m well aware that there are very large and rich corporations that have made themselves the cultural gate keepers who somehow seem to own most of all music and film, and a lot of the words, despite them not having created any of it. nd others corporations who seem to own any thinkable way of manufacturing most of the things we need. nd, yes,  know that they somehow have bribed the governments of most countries to do their bidding, and their plan of turning their scheme into international law is well advanced. nd they have plenty of ways of expanding their scam. ust like they can patent the vegetables in your garden and the cells in your body, they can of course also think up ways of making it seem like the music you create yourself and the videos you record violate their copyrights. hey could very well have the power to position a copyright-refusing nternet2 as a haven for pirates.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ut if, instead of buying into their game, feeling guilty when they entrap us into pirating their stuff, you recognize it for what it is, it will be a lot harder for them. f you create spaces where their stuff isn&#039;t allowed, it will slow them down. f you call them on it, fewer people will be fooled. here&#039;s still a chance that this civilization-killing scheme can be stopped and reversed.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;upport people who create. riters, musicians, photographers, artists, makers. irectly. upport their creativity. elp them make a living from it. ppose corporations and their lawyers and politicians who make a system out of owning and stopping creativity and communication, profiting unscrupulously from the creative work of others.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;reate loads and loads of new stuff. n new ways, in new media. ake it altogether impractical for them to keep up. xpand the commons faster than they can privatize it. se and support stuff that is free. ay for and reward added value, route around ownership.&lt;br/&gt;</description>
  79.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  80.   <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:50:04 GMT</pubDate>
  81.   <category>Information</category>
  82.  </item>
  83.  <item>
  84.   <title>2011 Accomplishments and 2012 Aims</title>
  85.   <link></link>
  86.   <description>&lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;; title=&quot;&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;20&quot; vspace=&quot;10&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;  alt=&quot;picture&quot; /&gt; &lt;/a&gt;t can be stimulating and rewarding to once in a while take stock of what one has accomplished and what one aims at doing next. he new year is traditionally a good time for doing that. nd, &#039;m in part inspired by such a &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x1_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;post from anessa iemis&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;o illustrate one good reason for writing it down, when  at first think about what  might have accomplished in 2011,  draw a blank. idn&#039;t really do much, and hadn&#039;t really planned anything either. ut when one looks a bit closer, there&#039;s of course more there...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;2011&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;n 2011  regained hope. ot that  was particularly hopeless, but there was a certain cynicism that had crept in.  &quot;been there, done that, it didn&#039;t work&quot; kind of attitude, hovering behind my habitual optimism. ow, suddenly, there are lots of reasons to be hopeful. he right people are starting to connect in the right ways. deas gain traction that previously didn&#039;t. onflicts that previously existed, no longer have much power. n the world scene, the centralized control system is crumbling fast. e have a unique opportunity to put something better in place. or the first time since the 1990s do  feel really energized and hopeful about this being the time when it is possible.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;n 2011  found my philosophical voice in a new way. hat was actually a life hack. &#039;m a member of a local &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x2_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;oastmasters&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x3_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;club&lt;/a&gt; where people practice public speaking. t is a good piece of advice for a public speaker to collect material that will be ready for use whenever one is called upon to say something. tories, jokes, quotes, that kind of thing. o,  made a document for recording good material when  ran into it.  made one of the categories y wn uotes, i.e. stuff &#039;ve said that  can be quoted for, because  wasn&#039;t able to come up with anything at the time. urprisingly, it turned out that  suddenly started saying more things that were quotable, on witter, on acebook, etc. hich in turn, ironically, means  have little use for my list, as it is more fun to make up something new.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#039;ve met a lot of people. pecifically,  now feel part of a global network of the &quot;right&quot; kind of people, which is really a mix of different kinds of people, but one that fits. nd it is not one thing. ather,  notice overlapping groups coming together, sort of under the surface, without formal leaders. hings are more likely to happen in hidden acebook groups or private hangouts. ot that there&#039;s anything secret going on, but it seems more productive with self-selecting groups that invite new members personally, rather than very visible public groups and causes that people go and join for abstract reasons. he ext dge is one name for a loose group that is quite happening.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;n ctober  was in ew ork for a week. articipating in &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x4_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ontacton&lt;/a&gt;, a &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x5_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;etaurrency&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x6_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;collabathon&lt;/a&gt;, and hanging out on iberty quare with &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x7_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ccupy allstreet&lt;/a&gt;. ll of it very inspiring. eeting a bunch of kindred souls  otherwise knew only online. nd the ccupy movement added a very tangible and present focus, an incarnation of much that we&#039;re talking about, and a surprising inspiration that sends things in a new direction. t was enlightening to see how a small group of people sleeping under tarps in &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x8_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;uccotti park&lt;/a&gt; could hold the world&#039;s attention. ery inspiring to experience the consensus process in a &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x9_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;eneral ssembly&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;n 2011  began to see &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x10_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ialogue&lt;/a&gt; happening online. .e. it seems possible for small groups of people to share a space with each other in a mindful manner, without agenda, without posturing, without conflict, exploring the unknown together.  have previously attempted that, and &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x11_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;failed&lt;/a&gt;, so it is new.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; decided to move forward with some of what  consider my own online projects, stuff  haven&#039;t gotten around to for years, despite not really having time. ronically, since &#039;m busy being a paid programmer for other people&#039;s projects,  am now experimenting with outsourcing some of my own programming projects to others. t is still unclear whether it will bear fruit, but it is nevertheless satisfying to see activity.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; started adjusting my work environment more to my liking. &#039;m now working on a standup desk most of the time, which  think is more healthy. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;2012&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#039;m intending to revamp my web presence, including sites that &#039;m responsible for that have been stagnant. ost important will probably be a long-awaited re-launch of &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x12_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;;/a&gt;, with a somewhat different spin. ut &#039;d also like to make my personal web presence more coherent, as it is spread over a number of sites now, hard to follow in one place.  also hope to launch one or two useful tools on the web that might gain some traction.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#039;m right now really excited about taking up &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x13_000010-001988_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;aquaponics&lt;/a&gt;. .e. cultivating fish and vegetables together in a small eco-system. &#039;m right now learning what  need to know, but  plan on getting that all going this year. n a greenhouse, &#039;m thinking. &#039;m not otherwise somebody you&#039;re likely to find outside with his hands in the dirt, so this will require some learning. hat motivates me is in part that it involves technology, besides it being completely organic and producing no waste. e already have chickens, we have a large backyard with fruit trees, and a well on the property, so we have good potential for being able to be quite self-sufficient.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;he aquaponics thing will be one thing to inspire/force me to be more handy. &#039;m a software guy and haven&#039;t traditionally been somebody you&#039;d find in the garage with power tools. ut &#039;d like in various ways to be more of a maker and tinkerer. n part for the fun, in part for the self-sufficiency aspects, in part because  think the economy is going in that kind of direction. o, if  don&#039;t run out of money from buying aquaponics equipment, &#039;m thinking maybe 3 printing, maybe some kind of solar panel setup. e can&#039;t use the standard government sponsored approach to that, as we only rent this house. h, and  need webcams, so  can monitor my aquaponics setup, etc.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; have almost no network here locally of the kind that is in sync with what &#039;m into online. hat is rather odd, if  compare with how it was for us in alifornia.  hope to remedy that this year. hat might be local groups that are into permaculture, local economies, the local fablab, co-ops, dialogue, etc.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;y current choice for exercise and socializing and being more in my body is dance. o, &#039;ll continue going to dance classes 3-5 nights per week. his year  hope  will master it to a sufficient degree, or maybe just relax with it, that it can be mainly the form of creative expression and social fun that  love, and not about remembering steps and sometimes awkwardly failing.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;h, and  need to make money too. &#039;m aiming to become independent of paid work this year. &#039;m 1/3 of the way there. hat is, 33% of my income is residual income from my own website projects. &#039;d like to get that to 100%, so that  can concentrate on doing what needs doing, not what  must do in order to make a living.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; intend to spend more time speaking the truth, or looking for it, if it isn&#039;t available. ess time being worried about what anybody else will think. ess time trying to please others even though things don&#039;t really fit.  will aim at being a conductor, not a resistor. referably a superconductor.</description>
  87.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  88.   <pubDate>Mon, 2 Jan 2012 18:52:10 GMT</pubDate>
  89.   <category>Diary</category>
  90.  </item>
  91.  <item>
  92.   <title>New year wish</title>
  93.   <link></link>
  94.   <description>&lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;; title=&quot;&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;20&quot; vspace=&quot;10&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;  alt=&quot;picture&quot; /&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ere&#039;s to our 2012 being magical, synchronistic, surprising and resilient.&lt;br/&gt; year where everything might change, but what&#039;s truly important is found to be indestructible.&lt;br/&gt; year where dreams are no longer just dreams, where reality grows on trees, and people can do what they imagine.&lt;br/&gt; time where you&#039;ll meet exactly those you need to meet.&lt;br/&gt; space where those things connect that fit.&lt;br/&gt;ay you feel at home in the fabric of life.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
  95.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  96.   <pubDate>Sun, 1 Jan 2012 05:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
  97.   <category>Inspiration</category>
  98.  </item>
  99.  <item>
  100.   <title>Are jobs becoming obsolete?</title>
  101.   <link></link>
  102.   <description>&lt;a href=&quot;;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;; title=&quot;&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;20&quot; vspace=&quot;10&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;  alt=&quot;picture&quot; /&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&#91;his was one of my answers on &lt;a href=&quot;; id=&quot;posts_0x1_000010-001987_outside_link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;uora&lt;/a&gt; a while back.&#93;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;he idea that there&#039;s a paying job waiting for everybody is going away.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;t was a somewhat odd idea in the first place. efore jobs were invented, people mostly worked to house and feed their family. uite strikingly, they did this by actually building the house and by actually growing the food. owadays, that&#039;s close to being illegal, as you most likely would violate building codes and zoning laws if you tried to do that in a western country. hat happened in the meantime was that a very complicated system was invented, where one would go out and work for other people, then buy what one needs from others, before one can go back home and enjoy it. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ne of the problems with the scheme is that there&#039;s no very good regulating mechanism for jobs. here&#039;s one for money, albeit a flawed one. f there is not enough money to pay for stuff, central banks have the job of putting more money into circulation. f there&#039;s too much money out there, it is their job to get rid of it, thus keeping the money supply fairly stable, corresponding roughly to what is there to pay for. gain, there are many problems with this, but at least there&#039;s a system to keep it stable.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;here&#039;s no system that automatically creates more jobs when there are some people who need them, or that retires some jobs if there&#039;s nobody to fill them. overnments try to do it, but unless they&#039;re centralized socialist governments, they don&#039;t have direct ways of doing it.  direct way would be to hire more people if there are people without jobs. hat they do is indirect stuff, in the form of &quot;stimulating&quot; the economy in various ways. ometimes they do this in ideological ways that might not even work, or that might do the opposite. or example, there&#039;s the supply-side philosophy that is popular with neo-conservatives in the nited tates. he idea is that if you give more money to rich people, they&#039;re smart enough to do things with it that creates more business, and thus more jobs. hen again, they might just invest it in some other ways, or buy gold-plated swimming pools for it. r they might buy robotic factories, not creating very many jobs. upply-side is seen in contrast to demand-side economics, which would stimulate the economy by giving regular people more money, inspiring them to go and spend it, thus getting the wheels turning. here&#039;s no guarantee that this creates more jobs either, as the stuff people are buying might still be produced in robotic factories and in another country.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ore things are being produced with less and less effort. roduction is becoming automated. ewer and fewer people can create more and more. his increased efficiency could potentially do many good things, but what it certainly doesn&#039;t do is produce more jobs. t naturally produces fewer jobs. nd the benefits of the increased efficiency are largely kept by the owners of the production machinery. es, people get cheaper stuff too, but they don&#039;t get the jobs that would pay them so they can afford to buy it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;his system is going to break sooner or later, but that&#039;s a different discussion.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;n the meantime, jobs are being replaced, increasingly, with being in business by yourself. ou&#039;ll have noticed, even if you have a job, that you&#039;ve had to compete to get it, to market yourself, to track down prospective employers, package yourself right, etc. here are rather few jobs just standing around waiting for you. obs aren&#039;t secure either, even if you have them. t is extremely unlikely to last your whole life, so you&#039;ll have to do it over and over. o, more people are going on to the next step, of being freelance and learning how to actually market their services, find customers, etc. ince you&#039;re becoming freelance anyway, you&#039;re also more likely to choose a line of activity that actually interests you, more than a regular job would.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;nother intriguing trend is likely to close the loop and take us back to a more sustainable and local way of living. s technology advances, it becomes possible to manufacture more stuff by yourself. hink about 3 printers and open source hardware and software. s the global economic system is becoming more uncertain and unstable, we perceive more of a need for taking care of our needs locally. he right combination of technologies will increasingly make it possible.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;o, one way or another, we&#039;re actually quite likely to get back where we started, but at a much higher level. .e. that you work on what you actually need and what you feel like working on. ou will need to network economically with other people, but no job needs to be involved.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;t would be a good idea to start right now to get used to the idea. rop the job thinking. hink about having skills that will be needed and useful, whether there&#039;s a job for it or not. hink about understanding who needs your services and how you can reach them. hink about organizing your life so that you might still eat and have a place to live, even if business is slow.</description>
  103.   <guid isPermaLink="true"></guid>
  104.   <pubDate>Thu, 1 Dec 2011 22:56:43 GMT</pubDate>
  105.   <category>Culture</category>
  106.  </item>
  107. </channel>
  108. </rss>

If you would like to create a banner that links to this page (i.e. this validation result), do the following:

  1. Download the "valid RSS" banner.

  2. Upload the image to your own server. (This step is important. Please do not link directly to the image on this server.)

  3. Add this HTML to your page (change the image src attribute if necessary):

If you would like to create a text link instead, here is the URL you can use:

Copyright © 2002-9 Sam Ruby, Mark Pilgrim, Joseph Walton, and Phil Ringnalda