FEED Validator

for Atom and RSS and KML

Congratulations!

This is a valid RSS feed.

Recommendations

This feed is valid, but interoperability with the widest range of feed readers could be improved by implementing the following recommendations.

line 30, column 0: Use of unknown namespace: com-wordpress:feed-additions:1 (21 occurrences) [help]
```
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">210803858</site>	<item>
```
line 60, column 0: content:encoded should not contain data-fuse attribute (2 occurrences) [help]
```
	<div id="ad_slot_22724279127_1" class="ad-slot ad-slot--article-hrec-1" dat ...
```
line 60, column 0: content:encoded should not contain data-fuse-slot-code attribute (2 occurrences) [help]
```
	<div id="ad_slot_22724279127_1" class="ad-slot ad-slot--article-hrec-1" dat ...
```
line 111, column 0: content:encoded should not contain data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c attribute (31 occurrences) [help]
```
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
```
line 1590, column 0: content:encoded should not contain aria-hidden attribute [help]
line 1745, column 0: content:encoded should not contain fetchpriority attribute [help]
line 1745, column 0: content:encoded should not contain decoding attribute (2 occurrences) [help]
line 1745, column 0: content:encoded should not contain sizes attribute (2 occurrences) [help]
line 1745, column 0: content:encoded should not contain data-recalc-dims attribute (2 occurrences) [help]

Source: https://www.truthdig.com/feed

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
<title>Truthdig</title>
<atom:link href="https://www.truthdig.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/</link>
<description>An Independent, Progressive Journal of News and Opinion.</description>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-US</language>
<sy:updatePeriod>
hourly </sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>
1 </sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>

<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">210803858</site> <item>
<title>Are GMOs Safe? A Molecular Geneticist Speaks Out</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/are-gmos-safe-a-molecular-geneticist-speaks-out/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=are-gmos-safe-a-molecular-geneticist-speaks-out</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/are-gmos-safe-a-molecular-geneticist-speaks-out/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacy Malkan / US Right To Know ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 15:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Health & Wellness]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[corn]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[genetically modified organisms]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[glysophate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[GMOs]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[pesticide]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311537</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A deep body of independent research raises serious concerns about the genetic impacts of GM foods and glyphosate-based herbicides.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/are-gmos-safe-a-molecular-geneticist-speaks-out/">Are GMOs Safe? A Molecular Geneticist Speaks Out</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Are genetically engineered foods safe? In an interview with a leading molecular genetics expert, we discuss the scientific evidence behind health concerns tied to genetically modified corn and pesticides, how genetically modified organisms are changing in ways that increase health risks and how regulatory systems have failed to keep pace with modern genetics.Professor Michael Antoniou, head of the Gene Expression and Therapy Group at King’s College London, has studied for more than 35 years how genes function and how they are disrupted. His decades of rigorous <a href="https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/michael-antoniou" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">independent research</a> into the risks of GM foods and glyphosate-based herbicides have raised serious concerns about the safety of these technologies. In a <a href="https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Informe-Toxicidad-Michael-Antoniou-Escrito-de-Replica-Mexico-ENG.pdf" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">report</a> he prepared for the Mexican government, as the country attempted to restrict GMO corn imports <a href="https://usrtk.org/gmo/new-scientific-analyses-mexicos-restrictions-on-gm-corn-glyphosate-health-risks/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">for health reasons</a>, Antoniou cited “a large body of evidence from well-controlled laboratory animal toxicity studies that show evidence of harm to multiple physiological systems” from toxic agents found in GM corn. In Part 1 of this interview, Antoniou explains that the health risks of GM corn and its associated pesticides arise from three main sources: Bt insecticidal proteins engineered into the plants, DNA damage caused by the genetic modification process itself, and pesticides used on the crops. <figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left">
<blockquote>
He concludes that regulatory systems remain stuck in outdated assumptions.
</blockquote>
</figure>He warns that today’s “stacked trait” GMOs — which combine multiple Bt toxins with resistance to several herbicides — have never been properly tested for safety, even though animal <a href="https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Informe-Toxicidad-Michael-Antoniou-Escrito-de-Replica-Mexico-ENG.pdf" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">studies cited</a> in <a href="https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-023-00787-4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">his work</a> show signs of liver, kidney, immune and digestive system damage from earlier single-trait GMOs. Evidence suggests Bt toxins may survive digestion, enter the bloodstream and trigger immune reactions linked to allergies. Antoniou also highlights findings from <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935123017127" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">his research</a> showing that mixtures of commonly used herbicides (<a href="https://usrtk.org/pesticides/glyphosate-health-concerns/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">glyphosate</a>, <a href="https://usrtk.org/pesticides/2-4-d-health-concerns/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">2,4-D</a>, <a href="https://usrtk.org/pesticides/dicamba/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">dicamba</a>), even at regulator-approved exposure levels, caused organ damage in rats. He concludes that regulatory systems remain stuck in outdated assumptions, ignoring both the risks of stacked GMO traits and the combined toxicity of pesticide mixtures to which people are routinely exposed.Stacy Malkan: Your testimony for the Mexican government cites many types of evidence that indicate the potential for “serious negative health outcomes” from eating GMO corn in the very high amounts typical for Mexican citizens. Could you tell us, what are the most concerning health effects showing up in the studies?Michael Antoniou: Before going into detail, we should realize initially there are three possible sources, minimally, of toxic outcomes from the consumption of not just GM corn, but GMO foods in general. First is the product of the foreign GM gene — the transgene. In the case of GMO corn, the insecticidal proteins, the Bt toxins, have never been an integral part of the human diet, especially in the special form they have been engineered into the crop. They can pose (a risk of) toxic or allergic reactions.<div id="ad_slot_wrapper_22724279127_1" class="max-w-td m-auto p-6 ad-slot--wrapper ad-slot--wrapper--article-hrec-1">

<div id="ad_slot_22724279127_1" class="ad-slot ad-slot--article-hrec-1" data-fuse="22724279127" data-fuse-slot-code="fuse-slot-227242791271">
</div>
</div>
Secondly, the GM transformation process — the process by which a GMO is generated in the laboratory — is highly mutagenic. What do I mean by that? Inadvertently, you create unintended damage to the DNA of the crop. Much of this DNA damage remains in the final marketed product. What is the danger from this? DNA damage can change the function of multiple genes — not just one, but many genes. And by changing the pattern of gene function in the organism, you will change its biochemistry and its composition, including the unexpected production of new toxins and allergens. Third, regardless of the GMO crop we’re talking about, they’re all grown with one or more different kinds of pesticides, mostly herbicides such as glyphosate. So they invariably come with pesticide residues, especially glyphosate residues, another source of potential toxicity we will discuss later. So these three elements are sources of possible toxicity from the consumption of GMO corn, which the Mexican government objected to because they were concerned about risks.I want to get into particular health effects you’re concerned about, but first let’s discuss how GMOs themselves are changing. In the U.S., most of the corn and soy we grow is genetically engineered as both insect resistant (Bt toxin) and herbicide resistant. Can you explain how these stacked-trait GMOs are increasing concerns about the types of DNA changes you’re talking about.Yes, a very important point here. In the earliest days, first-generation GMO crops had one or two different Bt toxins in them, and the early safety assessments were based on the single trait — a single Bt toxin, or glyphosate tolerance — and, rightly or wrongly, they were passed as safe using various criteria, which were completely inadequate anyway.What’s happened over the years is that, as insects have become resistant to the early Bt toxins that were engineered into the corn, companies have added <a href="https://foe.org/news/toxins-gmo-corn-mexico/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">more variants of Bt toxins</a> into the crop — <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00071/full" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">up to six now</a>, in some varieties. In addition, you’ve got not just glyphosate-tolerant genes, but up to three different herbicide-tolerant genes added on top of that. You would think the regulators would say, we’re dealing with a completely different animal here. You’d think they would reevaluate from scratch. But I’m afraid that’s not what’s happened. What regulators have done — no doubt, what industry has convinced them to do — is that if a GMO crop was passed as safe with one or two Bt toxins in it, it was assumed that when you combine more traits into one crop, there is no additional risk. Well I’m afraid that is not science; that’s just assumption.<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
</blockquote>It’s not as if they did the research to convince themselves that that was the case. It was a purely hypothetical assumption to avoid doing any proper health risk assessment. This is very worrying, because even with the early generation GMOs — especially corn containing at most two different varieties of Bt toxin — multiple well-conducted <a href="https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-023-00787-4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">laboratory animal feeding studies</a>, including studies conducted by industry, show signs of toxicity in the animals, especially pertaining to kidney and liver structure and function, but also to the digestive and immune systems.<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left">
<blockquote>
You saw biochemical changes in the blood indicative of liver and kidney dysfunction.
</blockquote>
</figure>Consistently, in studies conducted by independent academics, but even upon close scrutiny of the industry data submitted for market approval — even in relatively short-term, 90-day feeding studies — you saw biochemical changes in the blood indicative of liver and kidney dysfunction. This is with Bt corn containing just one or at most two varieties of Bt toxin. Now imagine what can happen if you amplified that with six different varieties of Bt toxin in one crop, and on top of that added the glyphosate tolerance and other traits — glufosinate, 2-4 D, and dicamba tolerance. You’re going to have up to six different Bt toxins and multiple herbicide residues all in the same foodstuff, and the direct evaluation of the toxicity of these stacked varieties of GMO corn have simply not been conducted. <div id="ad_slot_wrapper_22724432281_1" class="max-w-td m-auto p-6 ad-slot--wrapper ad-slot--wrapper--article-hrec-2">

<div id="ad_slot_22724432281_1" class="ad-slot ad-slot--article-hrec-2" data-fuse="22724432281" data-fuse-slot-code="fuse-slot-227244322811">
</div>
</div>
It has just been assumed by regulators that we passed this Roundup glyphosate-tolerant corn as safe, and this Bt toxin corn as safe, and when we combine them together we think it’s still going to be safe. But I’m afraid this is not on the basis of science. It’s on the basis of pure speculation. And it ignores the fact that these single traits of either Bt toxin corn or glyphosate-tolerant corn, when assessed in these rat toxicity studies I was referring to earlier, both of them showed signs of liver and kidney damage — structure and functional damage particularly — and that is based on relatively short-term feeding studies.So if you were to extrapolate going longer term, which unfortunately was never done, then it’s very worrying that these could have escalated into very serious health outcomes in these animals.So what are the consequences for human health? And do we see evidence of these types of problems in humans increasing since these foods have been on the market?This is a very good question, but unfortunately there have been no human epidemiological studies to try to correlate increases in GMO food consumption and negative health outcomes in say, the U.S. population, where they are consumed in quite large quantities compared to some other parts of the world. So we don’t really have an answer to this very important question.<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
</blockquote>What we do know is that there are incidences where people have <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1240687/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">reported allergic reactions</a> to the consumption of a Bt toxin corn in the United States (see the <a href="https://www.pew.org/~/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/reports/food_and_biotechnology/hhsbiotechstarcasepdf.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">StarLink corn case</a>). It was quite some time ago now. The StarLink Bt toxin corn was meant for animal feed, but it inadvertently ended up in the human food supply as well. There were some reports from people who said they had an allergic reaction.We shouldn’t find this surprising because there are very solid animal feeding studies in mice and rats that show that Bt toxins are highly immunogenic. What do I mean by that? They will elicit a very potent immune reaction in the consumer. That lays the foundation for developing into an allergy. So the fact that some people perhaps had this reaction after consuming StarLink, I don’t find surprising, and there could be many more people. As you know, in the United States, food intolerances, especially allergies, have skyrocketed in recent decades, especially since the launch of GMO crops and foods in the U.S. Has that contributed to the rise in food intolerances and allergies? This is a valid question to ask, which needs to be addressed formally. I can tell you that pediatricians I know in the United States whose families bring their sick children with food intolerances and allergies, once they moved them to organic whole foods diets, slowly but surely they got better. But is it the GMO food, or pesticide residues present in GMO and non-GMO foods? We cannot be specific. But the possibility is there that it could be exposure to these Bt toxins.It was assumed by regulators, without conducting proper testing, that the Bt toxins would break down —you’d digest them, they wouldn’t cause any harm. It turns out that Bt toxins, especially in the form in which they’re engineered into the foods, can survive the digestive process, and you can <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21338670/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">find elements of them in the bloodstream</a> of people. And who knows what the health implications of that are? It’s going to cause an immune reaction, for sure. Could that escalate into a food intolerance and an allergy? For me these are perfectly plausible outcomes that need to be addressed.We’ve talked about how GMO foods have been changing, but regulations are still stuck in the ’90s. One change is that, as weeds and insects have evolved around GM crops, companies have been genetically engineering plants to <a href="https://civileats.com/2020/07/01/bayer-forges-ahead-with-new-crops-resistant-to-5-herbicides-glyphosate-dicamba-2-4-d-glufosinate-quizalofop/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">resist multiple herbicides at once</a>, not just glyphosate, but also 2,4-D and dicamba. Tell us about your research on the toxic effects of combined pesticides.Inspired by this change in GMO cultivation in the U.S., we conducted a <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935123017127" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">rat feeding study</a> exposing animals to a mixture of glyphosate, 2,4-D and dicamba. Exposure began in mid pregnancy to reflect a more real-world exposure scenario, and continued until 13 weeks after weaning. The level of exposure was at the acceptable daily intake of each of these three herbicides in the European Union — a dose of each of these three herbicides that regulators say we should see no adverse health effects. We clearly see that the livers of these animals are suffering oxidative stress damage, and in the kidneys we’re finding even more pronounced structure and functional damage.<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left">
<blockquote>
Regulators are failing to consider combinatorial toxicity.
</blockquote>
</figure>My group is in the middle of a very extensive analysis of the gut of these animals as well … I can’t go into too much detail because it’s unpublished work, but I can say that it doesn’t look good for the animals. The key thing is that the level of the glyphosate was at the European Union acceptable daily intake in this mixture — half the acceptable daily intake in the United States. We didn’t see profound health outcomes. But when we mix that level of glyphosate with the 2,4-D and dicamba, we saw the most pronounced negative health outcomes. This is showing us how regulators are failing to consider combinatorial toxicity. We’re not just exposed to one chemical at a time a day. We’re exposed to tens of different pesticides every day through our food and that’s added to other toxic chemicals from other sources in the environment. So minimally, again, regulators must come of age and start to consider the mixture effects of pesticide and general chemical exposure, and not just glyphosate alone. In <a href="https://usrtk.org/gmo/new-scientific-research-challenges-claims-that-gmos-are-safe/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Part 2 of our interview</a>, Professor Antoniou explains how new scientific techniques, known as omics methods, raise new concerns about GMOs and pesticides and show that GMO crops are not equivalent to non-GMO varieties.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/are-gmos-safe-a-molecular-geneticist-speaks-out/">Are GMOs Safe? A Molecular Geneticist Speaks Out</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/are-gmos-safe-a-molecular-geneticist-speaks-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311537</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AdobeStock_92096768-scaled.jpeg?width=878&height=585" length="541862" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AdobeStock_92096768-scaled.jpeg?width=878&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>ICE in Harlan County</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/ice-in-harlan-county/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ice-in-harlan-county</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/ice-in-harlan-county/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Norton, Judah Schept / n+1 ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 15:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[dea]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[harlon county]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[immigration and customs enforcement]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[kentucky]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[opioid crisis]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311540</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Meet the deportation machine’s local partners.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/ice-in-harlan-county/">ICE in Harlan County</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
The U.S. deportation machine is rapidly expanding its capacity to terrorize and disappear people. With support from the <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trump</a> administration, masked and unidentified federal agents have been kidnapping people around the country and forcing them into a labyrinth of field offices and detention centers. Much of the response to this cruel reign of terror has focused on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/immigration-and-customs-enforcement/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="20" title="immigration and customs enforcement">Immigration and Customs Enforcement</a> raids in major cities — most notably in Los Angeles, where <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trump</a> imposed an occupying military force of thousands of National Guardsmen and Marines in June.
ICE is of course a worthy target for resistance. It is a federal law enforcement agency that increasingly resembles a secret police force, and it’s being used to target political dissidence and arbitrarily detain whomever it wants. Created in 2003, ICE is now poised to become the highest funded federal police force in U.S. history. But in addition to — and in coordination with — ICE, officers from numerous other agencies are working to abduct people from farms, factories and the streets of big cities and small towns. The extent to which this expanding federal police state relies on a vast network of jails, prisons and local police to do its brutal work is often overlooked. The United States’ sprawling carceral infrastructure — built up across the land over decades and designed from the start to dehumanize — enables the capture and deportation of increasing numbers of people. As the federal government deputizes these federal, state, and local agencies to partake in ICE’s work, it remakes existing infrastructure and political relationships in ICE’s image — remakes them, that is, toward fascism.
A recent raid in rural Kentucky illustrated several features of this transformed and expanded deportation machine. On the afternoon of May 29, armed federal agents descended on the small city of Harlan in a fleet of black SUVs and a white unmarked van. The agents — employees not of ICE, but of the Drug Enforcement Administration — raided Sazon Steakhouse, a popular Mexican restaurant. According to Jennifer McDaniels, who reported on the raid and its aftermath for the local Tri-City News, the agents handcuffed “an unconfirmed number of individuals … and loaded them in an unmarked white van” before driving away. Some people in the Harlan community report that there was a simultaneous raid at El Charrito, a restaurant down the road from Sazon.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Why send in the DEA to execute an immigration raid unrelated to drugs — to, in effect, do the work of ICE?</blockquote></figure>
Harlan sits in the coalfields of eastern Kentucky and has been immortalized in popular culture for its history of labor struggle and class warfare. The people of Harlan who gathered in the parking lot of Sazon during the raid were held back by Kentucky state police and told that the abduction of their neighbors by the DEA was part of “an ongoing drug investigation.” Given Kentucky’s recent status as one of the states most affected by the opioid crisis — and given the state’s distinction of having one of the highest local jail incarceration rates on the planet — the words “ongoing drug investigation” bought DEA agents enough time to abduct a group of workers and leave town unimpeded. In Kentucky, as around the United States, mass criminalization and the jail and prison boom of the past 35 years have set the stage for federal police to disappear people in broad daylight.
McDaniels, the Tri-City News reporter, lives in Harlan County and was on the scene during the raid in May. In the course of her reporting, she was told by a DEA spokesperson that the agents had come to Sazon for a “judicially authorized law enforcement operation pursuant to a drug investigation.” She was also told that the investigation was ongoing, and that there would be no further comment.
We spoke with McDaniels at Sazon in June. “I don’t like what (these raids) are doing to our community,” she said. “And our local leaders don’t like what it’s doing to our community. We took it personal here. We just really want to know what’s happening  … and nobody’s telling us.”
Opacity and confusion are critical tools of the U.S. police state. Collaborations across jurisdiction and scale rely on mystification. McDaniels noted that in the days following May 29, people in Harlan looked through online jail rosters and found that at least 13 people had been taken from the community and booked into the Laurel County Correctional Center, a county jail 70 miles away on the western edge of Kentucky’s coal country. They saw that the roster listed all the cases as “Immigration,” and that no one had been charged with a drug offense.
Why send in the DEA to execute an immigration raid unrelated to drugs — to, in effect, do the work of ICE? This flexibility of objective and jurisdiction is a feature of police power. The U.S. deportation apparatus can repurpose agencies whose authority would seem to lie outside immigration. Maria (not her real name), an immigrant justice advocate we spoke with in Lexington, Kentucky, noted that the Harlan immigration raid executed by the DEA was unexceptional. According to Maria, there are fewer than 20 ICE agents living in Kentucky and they are concentrated largely in Louisville; several other federal agencies, including the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and the FBI, have been involved in carrying out immigration raids in the state. “That’s the fight I’m having with (our) city council,” Maria said, “that federal agents can morph into ICE at any point and can make arrests if they suspect you are undocumented. Especially in smaller counties, we are seeing cooperation between DEA and ICE to go after people.” Reports from around the country, including documentation of the startling conscription of IRS agents into carrying out immigration arrests, corroborates these observations in Kentucky.
The official Instagram page of the Louisville office of the DEA boasts openly about the agency’s collaboration with ICE, the ATF and local police, as well as its role in arresting immigrants in Kentucky, West Virginia and Tennessee. The agency’s social media posts frequently showcase what the scholar Travis Linnemann has called “police trophy shots,” where officers representing different agencies pose with arrested immigrants. A characteristic post from March 24 reads, “#DEA agents are working with @DHSgov personnel to enforce US #immigration laws and assist with the #removal of #illegal #migrants from our communities. #deportations.” Another post, from June 12, shows 10 people clearly arrested at work, in a restaurant, sitting in handcuffs in the dining area in their aprons. The caption reads: “#DEA does not turn a blind eye to immigration crimes. If we encounter anyone who is in this country illegally during a drug investigation, those individuals can expect to be arrested and processed for deportation.” Posts announcing these partnerships with the Department of Homeland Security started in early February, just weeks into the second Trump administration.
*   *   *
In Harlan, DEA agents abducted both men and women; the youngest was 18 and the oldest was in her 50s. After their detention in the Laurel County Correctional Center, abductees were transferred to the Kenton County Detention Center in northern Kentucky on June 2. They were held in Kenton County until June 9, at which point they were listed on the jail roster as having been transferred out of state. We could not find any of the people who had been abducted from Harlan on ICE’s Online Detainee Locator System, and, after a few days, there was no record of them ever having been detained in the Kenton County jail. But by comparing information about people abducted in Harlan with ICE detainer data obtained by the Deportation Data Project via Freedom of Information Act requests, we could see that at least a few people were moved from Kenton County to the Clay County Jail in Indiana. From Clay County, at least one person was moved to the Broadview Service Staging Area in Illinois, just outside Chicago, and from there, deported from the Gary/Chicago International Airport in Gary, Indiana.
Following these trajectories illuminates the significant role county jails — many of them recently built or expanded — play in the infrastructure of detention.
The Laurel County Correctional Center is a massive county jail that was opened in 2020 in London, Kentucky. The jail cost the county $24 million and has a capacity of almost 700 beds, with the ability to expand to 1,000 beds — several times the capacity of the previous county jail. Laurel County’s population is just over 60,000; Lexington, 90 minutes north, and with five times the population, has a jail capacity of 1,300.
The eye-watering size of the new jail was financially motivated: The Laurel County Correctional Center was built with the purpose of generating revenue by renting jail beds to federal agencies such as ICE and the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS). This process is not unique to Kentucky. Recent reporting from The New York Times has documented how ICE has worked with rural communities in Louisiana to repurpose existing state prisons and county jails, converting them into detention centers. During the first Trump administration, this federal capture of jail and prison capacity tripled the number of ICE detention beds in the state. Other reporting and independent research have shown similar arrangements in Florida, Texas and beyond. “County jails,” as the immigration scholar and activist Silky Shah has written, “are the bedrock of the detention system.”
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>The Laurel County Correctional Center was built with the purpose of generating revenue.</blockquote></figure>
Federal agencies give Laurel County $70 a day for each person held by the county on their behalf. While Laurel County signed an Intergovernmental Service Agreement (IGSA) with the Marshals Service and not specifically with ICE, it is well understood that IGSAs with USMS can be used by other federal agencies. As an Iowa county jail administrator explained in 2019, “We have a contract with the Marshals, but we never actually housed Marshal inmates. It’s just that ICE piggybacked off that, so we just have ICE inmates.”
Laurel County is now an important hub for today’s federal police state — and, with the revenue gained from the jail, a place where everyday life in the county is tied directly to masked federal agents disappearing neighbors from their workplaces and off the streets. “We can use the money we’re saving from the jail to help our county progress in a lot of different ways,” the judge-executive David Westerfield said in 2021. “We will spread it among the magisterial districts for more roadwork. The biggest thing I’m looking for is to make the county better for the people.”
Better for which people? By 2022, two years after the opening of the enlarged Laurel County Correctional Center, 2% of all working-age people in Laurel County, on any given day, were locked up in the county jail — an incarceration rate 6½ times that of the United States as a whole.
This use of local jails as a sort of protofascist infrastructure has unfolded over decades, a product of the quiet jail boom that expanded local jail capacity across the country, particularly in rural communities. The addition of Section 287(g) to the Immigration and Nationality Act in 1996 inaugurated the formal deputization of local and state police to carry out specific immigration enforcement policies. But the use of local jails in rural counties specifically for the purposes of immigration detention has grown especially rapidly since the second Trump administration began.
North of Laurel County, Kenton County’s collaboration with ICE is a recent development. The county signed a 287(g) agreement with ICE in May 2025, one of 10 jurisdictions in Kentucky that have done so since the first week of March. Elsewhere on some of the Harlan detainees’ trajectory of terror, the Clay County Jail — in Brazil, Indiana, halfway between Louisville and Chicago — was recently expanded in the wake of the Illinois Way Forward Act, a 2021 law that ended Illinois jail contracts with ICE. The ICE revenue, instead, has flowed to Clay County.
More and bigger detention infrastructure follows a strict logic of “if you build it, they will fill it.” Larger county jails not only enable the incarceration of more people by local police, but they also offer flexible detention capacity to ICE and other federal agencies. As one recent report from the Prison Policy Initiative puts it, local jails both “obscure and facilitate” mass deportation.
Unsurprisingly, immigration arrests and detentions have continued in central and eastern Kentucky since the May 29 raid in Harlan. On Sunday, June 8, between 5 and 11 a.m., 25 women were booked into the Laurel County Correctional Center on immigration charges; an additional 18 people were booked on immigration charges three days later. The next day, June 12, seven more people were booked into the Kenton County Detention Center.
*   *   *
On July 4, President Trump signed into law the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill, which allocates $170 billion to immigration enforcement over the next four years. With recent funding levels for ICE at around $9 billion per year, the bill exponentially expands the scope of the agency, including more than $40 billion for border infrastructure, more than $40 billion for new facilities, and more than $25 billion for hiring new officers. The funding, according to one analyst with the Migration Policy Institute, will “supercharge” what is already an expansive geography of detention. A senior fellow at the American Immigration Council noted that over the four-year period, “ICE’s budget would be slightly larger than the budgets of the FBI, DEA, ATF, Bureau of Prisons, and U.S. Marshals Service combined. ICE would have more funding than any federal law enforcement agency has had in history.”
In Kentucky, more than a thousand people have been ensnared in this immigrant dragnet since January. According to Maria, there have been no concomitant expansions to legal or other support services for people arrested on immigration charges, nor for their families or communities. “We have zero nonprofit organizations in Kentucky that can do detention work,” she told us. “We don’t have the infrastructure to tackle this work, and that’s my worst nightmare.”
While we track and fight the deployment of the Marines and National Guard in Los Angeles, turn our attention to the creation of a massive detention facility in the Florida Everglades and prepare for the expansion of ICE enabled by the bill, we should not overlook the ways federal mandates mobilize and even repurpose ostensibly distinct agencies and capacities of the state. Midsize city offices of the DEA; small-town sheriff’s departments, expanded county jails, legal agreements between local and federal agencies — these are the mundane infrastructures that fascism requires.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/ice-in-harlan-county/">ICE in Harlan County</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/ice-in-harlan-county/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311540</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP813805048764-scaled.jpg?width=863&height=585" length="589567" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP813805048764-scaled.jpg?width=863&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Right on Target</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/right-on-target/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=right-on-target</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/right-on-target/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Aubry Kaplan / Capital & Main ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 15:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Business & Economy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[boycott]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[DEI]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[maga]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311544</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The Black-led boycott of the popular retailer seems to be working, even in L.A. neighborhoods that once yearned for big-box stores.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/right-on-target/">Right on Target</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
In the aftermath of the racial unrest that erupted across Los Angeles 33 years ago, many Black residents and leaders hoped to rebuild the economy by bringing back the amenities South Central had been lacking for too long. Topping the list was retail. The elegant clothing stores that had once populated areas like the Crenshaw District through the 1960s were long gone: By 1992 it was the big chain retailers that conferred middle-class stability and that seemed to be opening everywhere except Black communities — retailers like Trader Joe’s, IKEA, Nordstrom Rack. And Target.
Target eventually did come, to the foothills of Baldwin Hills in the Crenshaw District, and to Inglewood, among other places. But in the <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trump</a> era, an age of rampant inequality made worse by a full-on retreat from racial justice, being here is not enough. Since January, after President <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> assumed office for the second time and immediately began cracking down on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, banning them in government and vilifying them in general, Target has been the focus of a <a href="https://thebusinessjournal.com/pro-dei-organizers-fired-up-to-maintain-target-boycott-as-promises-go-unfulfilled/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">nationwide boycott</a> initially sparked by activists in the chain’s home state of Minnesota and led by Black <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/video/target-faces-40-day-boycott-over-dei-policies/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">faith groups</a>, Georgia pastor Jamal Bryant and the Rev. Al Sharpton, activists across the country and consumers. The boycott has doubtlessly contributed to <a href="https://apnews.com/article/target-first-quarter-earnings-tariffs-ed5765bac92257a0bab3815ece31f5c1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">declining</a> <a href="https://www.retaildive.com/news/target-turnaround-q2-sales-drop-ceo-exit/758147/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">sales</a> this year and the <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/20/business/target-stock-ceo-cornell" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">replacement</a> of Target’s CEO.
As Trump began officially discrediting “wokeness,” Target quickly <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/03/business/target-dei-walmart-amazon" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">abandoned the $2 billion commitment</a> it made in 2022 to increase Black businesses’ products and their representation in its stores. It was hardly the only company to renege on efforts at racial equity that materialized after the 2020 murder of George Floyd, an African American, by white Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin. But the scope of Target’s pledge and the fact that it carried many unique Black-owned brands, from hair care to stationery, made the company’s efforts stand out as something more than mere PR.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>In the Trump era … being here is not enough.</blockquote></figure>
Target, of course, isn’t the first big retailer to come under fire from the Black community for being absent. But this time it’s not for its lack of stores, but for its failure to stand by Black customers, businesses and the principles of economic justice the company claimed to care about. The boycott takes its cues from the segregation-era “<a href="https://www.searchablemuseum.com/dont-buy-where-you-cant-work/#:~:text=During%20the%201930s%2C%20Black%20activists,African%20Americans%20during%20the%20Depression." target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Don’t Buy Where You Can’t Work</a>” campaigns, when Black people urged one another not to spend money in stores that refused to hire them. The message this time around is more subtle but still urgent: Don’t Spend Where You Aren’t Respected.
Respect is an old cause that’s finding new traction among Black consumers today as the Trump administration continues to attack racial justice on all fronts. The call for respect started growing after 2020, when the national soul-searching prompted by Floyd’s murder made Americans more aware of history, especially how the work of enslaved Africans was key to building up the country’s enormous wealth. In that light, <a href="https://corporate.target.com/press/release/2022/05/target-provides-update-on-commitment-to-spend-2-bi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Target’s $2 billion pledge</a> was not charity but an acknowledgement of the debt corporate America has always owed Black people. That’s why Target’s abrupt reneging on that pledge feels so unacceptable to Black organizations <a href="https://www.nielsen.com/insights/2025/connecting-black-america/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">and consumers</a>.
The Rev. Jonathan Moseley, Western regional director with the National Action Network, one of the organizations leading the boycott, said that the lesson Black people are learning — or relearning — is that while a marquee retailer in the community is ostensibly a good thing, it is primarily there for profit, and to look after its own interests. 
“It’s important that Black people don’t become confused,” said Moseley. “These stores don’t want you there. They give you a few crumbs.” 
The real long-term solution, he said, is for Black people to build their own businesses that serve their own interests, as they did in earlier times of segregation, when they frequently had no choice. 
“We have more to offer than any Target,” he said. “We have to follow the blueprint of our own history.”
Black people also have to respond to the massive MAGA energy driving Trump’s war on DEI that prompted Target and other corporate giants to abandon those principles in the first place. On Aug. 28 — the 62nd anniversary of the Rev. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech during the March on Washington — the National Action Network, founded by Sharpton, staged the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/28/nyregion/sharpton-wall-street-march-trump-dei.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">March on Wall Street</a>, a demonstration against Trump’s anti-Black agenda that drew thousands of people to Lower Manhattan from states across the country, including California.
At the event, Sharpton drew the historical connection between the march and Occupy Wall Street, the grassroots 2011 movement that protested the fast-growing wealth gap in America. But unlike Occupy, the march’s main grievance was racial. 
“If we leave (Trump) unchecked on DEI … he will completely erase the freedoms our parents and our grandparents fought, bled and died for,” Sharpton told the crowd, adding that the event was also meant to highlight “the power of Black Americans and their dollars.”
Clearly more is at stake than just prevailing with Target and other companies that have shut down their diversity efforts, such as <a href="https://apnews.com/article/walmart-dei-inclusion-diversity-34b06922e60e5116fe198696201ce4d9" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Walmart</a>, <a href="https://apnews.com/article/dei-pepsi-al-sharpton-boycott-a46bdb26eb50ba66845d935fc891b828" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">PepsiCo</a> and <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/10/amazon-ending-dei-programs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Amazon</a>. But the Target boycott is complicated by the struggles of retail that weren’t on the horizon in ’92 but are now well known. The last three decades have seen the collapse or consolidation of department stores like the Broadway and the May Co. — the original anchor tenants of the Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza, also known as the Crenshaw mall — and later, discount chains like Big Lots and the 99 Cent stores (the Target near Baldwin Hills fills the space once occupied by Fedco, which closed in 1999).
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Can Black people expect corporate America to ever do the right thing?</blockquote></figure>
Target is one of the only big retail chains still standing, one of the few familiar shopping destinations left in an urban landscape pocked again with shuttered storefronts that are oddly reminiscent of 1992. While Moseley’s call for more self-sufficiency makes a lot of sense, the reality is that there are no Black-owned retailers to take their place, and building Black businesses of the scale that’s needed is notoriously difficult. 
In 2021, when the local nonprofit organization Downtown Crenshaw Rising tried to purchase the Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza — the biggest retail center in L.A.’s historically Black communities — it encountered fierce resistance by the commercial retail establishment, even though it was prepared to bid over the asking price. The nonprofit’s vision of the sprawling but ailing mall involved not just retail, but community space, green space and other amenities the community had wanted since 1992. The mall was ultimately sold to a private company, and currently has only one modest-sized anchor tenant — T.J. Maxx — after the departure of Macy’s, Sears and Walmart.
The enduring question raised by the Target boycott is: Can Black people expect corporate America to ever do the right thing? Moseley said the boycott is less about reforming corporate priorities than it is about waking Black people up to their own power, economic and otherwise. The perilousness of the moment demands that they do just that. 
“The campaign going forward is not to bring back DEI — it’s to bring back the commitment Target made to Black people, pre-Trump,” he said. “If we can do that for us, what else can we do for us? Just imagine. We are stronger together than we are apart.”
Copyright 2025 Capital & Main
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/right-on-target/">Right on Target</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/right-on-target/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311544</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25046614100667-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" length="436009" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25046614100667-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>The Roading of the Last Wild Places</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-roading-of-the-last-wild-places/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-roading-of-the-last-wild-places</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-roading-of-the-last-wild-places/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Ketcham]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[TD Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[TD Original]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[public land]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Roadless Area Conservation Policy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[roadless rule]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[U.S. Forest Service]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311516</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Trump’s latest upending of conservation policy will be a disaster for wild landscapes and the creatures who live in them.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-roading-of-the-last-wild-places/">The Roading of the Last Wild Places</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
The <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trump</a> administration is plotting to undo a quarter-century of policy for the protection of national forests against new road building. This is a terrible turn for our public lands and needs to be stopped. 
When I lived in the little town of Moab, Utah, my habit on hot summer days was to drive into the nearby La Sal Mountains, a mostly roadless island of pines and firs and freshwater streams floating over the oven of the red rock desert. The La Sals, public land overseen by the U.S. Forest Service, include vast stretches of woods accessible only by foot. The thing to do there was to dump your car on one of the few dirt roads that cross the mountains, shoulder your pack and give oneself over to the habitat of the cougars, lynx, black bears and elk, none of whom like roads (or, for that matter, people who go backpacking).
Much of the forest of the La Sals was designated to be protected from new development under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Policy issued in the final days of the Clinton administration. The roadless rule, as it became known, ended road construction, logging and coal, gas, oil and other mineral leasing on 58 million acres of some of the wildest remaining undeveloped national forest lands — an area equal in size to all of Pennsylvania and New York State combined. The roadless rule happened not because the federal government happily opted to stop giving public land to industry for private profit. It was the result of a decade of conflict between the federal government and mainstream environmental groups and enviro direct actionists who engaged in tree sits and blockades and other forms of civil disobedience. Some 600 public hearings were held across the nation to discuss the roadless rule, with the public providing more than 1.6 million comments over two years. The proposed rule received more comments than any other environmental rule on public lands in U.S. history.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>What had taken two years to put together would now be put asunder in three weeks. </blockquote></figure>
In June, the <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trump</a> administration announced that it intended to rescind the roadless rule, and this month it instituted an accelerated three-week public comment period, set to end on Sept. 19.  What had taken two years to put together would now be put asunder in three weeks. 
The most important thing to understand about President Donald Trump’s endeavor is that every new road blazed into a previously unroaded landscape is a disaster for wild landscapes and the creatures who live in them. In two decades reporting on the exploitation of American public lands, I’ve found that the most important first effort in destruction of habitat and the fouling of clean air and water is the building of a road. 
A road cut through wilderness is a wound that won’t stop bleeding. It doesn’t matter if it’s paved or unpaved, though a paved road always brings more traffic. Then again, it doesn’t matter whether a road is heavily trafficked or lightly used. The very presence of a road alters the environment around it. This is especially true in high-altitude forested landscapes, such as the La Sals, as roads divert the natural downstream flow of precipitation, producing heavier runoff and more erosion that disrupts the hydrology and sedimentation of nearby waterways. Road runoff carries the poisons that automobiles drip from their chassis. The grinding engines and the sound of rattling metal terrify wildlife. From the tailpipes comes carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, heavy metals. You get more roadkill. You get more hunting and poaching. Roads scare off the cougars and wolves and bears, who learn that death awaits on roads.
Reed Noss, one of the premier conservation biologists in the United States, writes that the cumulative effect of roads blazed into previously unroaded ecosystems is “nothing short of catastrophic.” For the sake of wild things, Noss recommended that most existing roads on public lands “should be closed and obliterated.” He especially liked the idea of keeping out road-attracted humans who “bring along their chainsaws, ATVs, guns, [and] dogs,” who “harass virtually every creature they meet, and leave their mark on every place they visit. The more inaccessible we can keep our remaining wild areas to these cretins, the safer and healthier these areas will be.”
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>A road cut through wilderness is a wound that won’t stop bleeding.</blockquote></figure>
Noss is one of a host of conservation biologists to come to this conclusion. Biologists publishing in the journal Science found that roads “fragment landscapes and trigger human colonization and degradation of ecosystems, to the detriment of biodiversity and ecosystem functions.” 
In the American West, even a few dirt roads built near streams on public lands where native trout spawn can produce terrible damage. The fish depend on a properly functioning riparian system, with its panoply of vegetation, its resistance to erosion. The fish rely on intricate gravel substrates where eggs lodge in nests called redds, and on clean, cold water that carries off the waste discharge of the embryos and oxygenates the eggs. Now a road comes through. The water is clouded with eroded soils. Fish eggs suffocate in the fine silt and clays and sand. They rot in their waste, as the smothering cloud prevents it from being washed away. The fine sediment, like a wave of glue, cements the gravels, impeding construction of the redds. The available light in a trout stream must be just so.
The roadless area nearest my house in the Catskill Mountains is the Slide Mountain Wilderness, some 50,000 acres of forest, hills, cliffs, peaks and clean water. It’s the place people around here go if they wish to escape the machines of industrial Homo sapiens. There are no roads and no mechanized travel, in keeping with the 1964 Wilderness Act, which defines wilderness as “an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man.” Lands designated as wilderness under the act retain their “primeval character and influence.” Not only are roads prohibited in wilderness areas, so is extractive industry, and there are severe restrictions on commercial activity. No business, no money making, also no cars, no motorcycles — hell, you can’t even ride a bicycle in designated wilderness because it’s considered a form of mechanized transport.
The 2001 roadless rule was an extension of the wilderness protection ethic of the 1964 law. For an administration hell-bent on exploiting land to make as much money as possible, the roadless rule is anathema. If our last wild places are to stand a chance of surviving this century, it must remain in place.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-roading-of-the-last-wild-places/">The Roading of the Last Wild Places</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-roading-of-the-last-wild-places/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311516</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AdobeStock_255036468.jpeg?width=1040&height=585" length="18003448" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AdobeStock_255036468.jpeg?width=1040&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Low Oil Prices Have Made Trump’s Oil Boom Go Bust</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/low-oil-prices-have-made-trumps-oil-boom-go-bust/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=low-oil-prices-have-made-trumps-oil-boom-go-bust</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/low-oil-prices-have-made-trumps-oil-boom-go-bust/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naveena Sadasivam / Grist ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Business & Economy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[oil and gas industry]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[opec]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[saudi arabia]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[trump tariffs]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311513</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Trump promised the U.S. oil industry it was time to "drill, baby, drill." Companies are laying off workers and reducing spending instead.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/low-oil-prices-have-made-trumps-oil-boom-go-bust/">Low Oil Prices Have Made Trump’s Oil Boom Go Bust</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
This story was originally published by <a href="https://grist.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Grist</a>. Sign up for Grist’s <a href="https://go.grist.org/signup/weekly/partner?utm_campaign=republish-content&utm_medium=syndication&utm_source=partner" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">weekly newsletter here</a>.
When President <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> took office, he promised to “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/unleashing-american-energy/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">unleash” American energy</a> — and quickly left no doubt that he meant <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-will-declare-national-energy-emergency-incoming-administration-official-2025-01-20/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">fossil fuel energy in particular</a>.
In the months since, he has opened up vast stretches of public lands and U.S. oceans for drilling and reduced the royalty rates that companies must pay for extracting oil and gas in those areas. His administration has also proposed <a href="https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-launches-biggest-deregulatory-action-us-history" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">scrapping environmental rules</a> requiring polluters to <a href="https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-releases-proposal-end-burdensome-costly-greenhouse-gas-reporting-program-saving-24" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">report their emissions to the EPA</a>, <a href="https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-releases-proposal-end-burdensome-costly-greenhouse-gas-reporting-program-saving-24" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">easing regulations for oil and gas wastewater disposal</a>, and <a href="https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-announces-reconsideration-risk-management-plan-boost-safety-competitiveness" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">rewriting rules to weaken risk management protocols at refineries</a>. And by declaring a national energy emergency, Trump has <a href="https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/department-interior-implements-emergency-permitting-procedures-strengthen-domestic" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">cleared the way for faster permitting</a> primarily for fossil fuel infrastructure, bringing down review timelines from multiple years to a few weeks. Trump’s signature legislation, the One Big Beautiful Act, quietly included <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/us-taxpayers-will-pay-billions-in-new-fossil-fuel-subsidies-thanks-to-the-big-beautiful-bill/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">billions of dollars in new federal tax breaks</a> available to fossil fuel companies. More substantially, it dramatically scaled back federal support for wind and solar energy, as well as electric vehicles — effectively dealing a blow to the newer technologies competing with oil and gas interests.
But the boom times Trump has promised U.S. fossil fuel producers have not materialized. In fact, the industry is headed in the opposite direction: In recent months, Chevron said it would <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8ed3n1zw05o" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">cut as much as one-fifth of its workforce</a>, ConocoPhillips announced plans to let go of <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/conocophillips-says-it-will-cut-workforce-by-20-25-shares-fall-2025-09-03/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">up to a quarter of its workforce</a> by the end of the year, and Halliburton <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/halliburton-reduces-workforce-oil-activity-slumps-sources-say-2025-09-05/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">began its own round of layoffs</a>. Across the sector, companies have also <a href="https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Big-Oil-Cuts-Back-as-60-Oil-Bites.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">been reining in spending</a>, cutting capital expenditures, pausing or canceling major projects, and reducing rig counts.
“We believe we are at a tipping point for U.S. oil production at current commodity prices,” <a href="https://www.diamondbackenergy.com/news-releases/news-release-details/letter-stockholders-issued-diamondback-energy-inc-7" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">warned Travis Stice</a>, CEO of Diamondback Energy, a Texas-based oil and gas company, in May. “Today’s prices, volatility, and macroeconomic uncertainty have put [the industry’s] progress in jeopardy.”
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“We believe we are at a tipping point for U.S. oil production at current commodity prices.”</blockquote></figure>
Since Trump’s inauguration in January, crude oil prices have <a href="https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=RWTC&f=M" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">dropped nearly 20%</a>. That’s left prices below the roughly $65-per-barrel level where most U.S. producers can expect to break even on drilling, and they’re cutting back in anticipation of these unprofitable extraction conditions lasting into 2026. Indeed, the Energy Information Agency projects that oil prices, which currently sit at about $62 per barrel, will <a href="https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/pdf/steo_full.pdf?ref=eltiempolatino.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">drop to $51 per barrel next year</a>.
This reflects the makeup of the global oil market, which Trump has far less control over compared to the domestic regulations he’s attacked. In Saudi Arabia, for instance, where drilling costs are among the lowest in the world, <a href="https://www.nber.org/digest/jan18/limits-opec-output-increase-global-oil-production-costs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">a barrel of oil costs at most $10 to extract</a>. So when the global price of oil drops, as it has this year, American producers feel the squeeze — but national oil companies in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, continue to be profitable.
So even though Trump has called for more drilling to lower domestic gasoline prices, American companies see little reason to pump more oil when prices are below the break-even point. The result reveals a paradox in the administration’s pursuit of what it calls “<a href="https://grist.org/language/trump-energy-dominance-vibes-nostalgia-oil/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">energy dominance</a>”: It wants both lower prices and more drilling, but the former automatically discourages the latter.
“The goal of energy dominance is perhaps not fully aligned with the goal of low oil prices without significant innovation,” said Susan Bell, a senior vice president at Rystad Energy, an independent research firm, in an emailed statement. “Increasing U.S. production in a world that is oversupplied with oil in the near term would certainly drive prices down, ultimately making investment in the sector uneconomic.”
That disconnect has been on full display this year. Even as Trump promised boom times for the oil and gas industry, he has called on OPEC to increase production as a means to fulfill his promise to lower gasoline prices for Americans. In a January speech, he told OPEC to “bring down the oil price,” and in March he said that it was “very important that OPEC increase the flow of oil” in a social media post on X.
The following month, OPEC announced it would increase production at a time when oil prices were already at a four-year low, taking industry analysts by surprise. While the move may have been an attempt to appease Trump, it was also an opportunity to assert dominance over American companies and increase the cartel’s market share. The increased production also acts as a buffer against price volatility by creating oversupply that can be tapped in times of crisis. There has been no shortage of the latter in recent years, with escalating conflict in the Middle East and the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war.
“All this extra supply creates a cushion,” said Trey Cowan, an oil and gas analyst at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, which tracks the rise of renewable energy and its impact on fossil fuels. “Events like the hunting down of people in Qatar by Israel — normally, that would be a crisis situation. Oil prices would spike tremendously. And while they did surge, they came right back down.”
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“There is some expectation that oil prices could be lower for an extended period of time.”</blockquote></figure>
Trump’s tariffs haven’t helped the U.S. fossil fuel industry either. His surcharges on steel and aluminum, two metals ubiquitously used in oil and gas infrastructure, have increased the cost of production. “The cost of our largest drilling input cost, casing, has increased over 10 percent in the last quarter due to steel tariffs,” Stice, the Diamondback Energy CEO, noted in his letter to shareholders. 
Cowan said that, while oil prices rise and fall periodically, the industry is facing a highly volatile market at a time when gasoline demand is poised to take a hit from the growing adoption of electric vehicles. In its drive to find new markets, the industry invested heavily in refineries producing plastics. But there, too, the industry is now facing oversupply and slim profit margins.
“You’re running out of places to use the oil, so then you’re creating an oversupply condition that’s going to continue for a longer period of time,” said Cowan. “There is some expectation that oil prices could be lower for an extended period of time.”
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/low-oil-prices-have-made-trumps-oil-boom-go-bust/">Low Oil Prices Have Made Trump’s Oil Boom Go Bust</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/low-oil-prices-have-made-trumps-oil-boom-go-bust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311513</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/GettyImages-1351214628-e1757961534986.webp?width=1022&height=575" length="26718" type="image/webp" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/GettyImages-1351214628-e1757961534986.webp?width=1022&height=575" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Trump Doubles Down on Drug War in the Caribbean</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-doubles-down-on-drug-war-in-the-caribbean/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=trump-doubles-down-on-drug-war-in-the-caribbean</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-doubles-down-on-drug-war-in-the-caribbean/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connor Echols / Responsible Statecraft ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Americas]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[drug trafficking]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[extrajudicial killings]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[narcoterrorism]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[war on drugs]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311510</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Legal experts say the attacks on alleged smugglers likely violate US and international law.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-doubles-down-on-drug-war-in-the-caribbean/">Trump Doubles Down on Drug War in the Caribbean</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
U.S. forces bombed a boat in the Caribbean Sea that was allegedly carrying drugs from Venezuela, killing three “narcoterrorists,” President <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/115210075167747572" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">announced</a> Monday.
“The Strike occurred while these confirmed narcoterrorists from Venezuela were in International Waters transporting illegal narcotics (A DEADLY WEAPON POISONING AMERICANS!) headed to the U.S.,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social, adding that the cartels “POSE A THREAT to U.S. National Security, Foreign Policy, and vital U.S. Interests.”
The attack marks the second set of U.S. airstrikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean since Trump surged U.S. troops to the region last month. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has pledged to continue the attacks, <a href="https://x.com/kenklippenstein/status/1963337157906694473" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">said</a> earlier this month the Pentagon is “prepared with every asset that the American military has” in case Trump decides to launch an operation to unseat Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, who the U.S. alleges is the leader of a cartel.
Legal experts <a href="https://www.justsecurity.org/120568/caribbean-strike-departure-war-on-terror/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">say</a> the attacks are likely a violation of both U.S. and international law. “Under the administration’s reasoning, there is nothing stopping the U.S. government from executing purported drug traffickers without due process, no matter where they are,” John Ramming Chappell, an adviser at the Center for Civilians in Conflict, told Responsible Statecraft.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“We are in incredibly dangerous territory when the president can murder people as he sees fit.”</blockquote></figure>
“Congress never authorized the use of military force against drug cartels, and the president arbitrarily labeling people as terrorists doesn’t mean he can kill them with impunity,” Ramming Chappell added. “Intentional killing outside of armed conflict and without due process is murder, and we are in incredibly dangerous territory when the president can murder people as he sees fit.”
It remains unclear whether Congress will take steps to rein in Trump’s campaign. After initially <a href="https://responsiblestatecraft.org/venezuela-war/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">staying</a> quiet on the first set of strikes, several prominent Democratic lawmakers have since issued statements <a href="https://meeks.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-foreign-affairs-committee-ranking-member-meeks-demands-answers-and-legal" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">condemning</a> the attacks and <a href="https://www.kaine.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/senators_letter_to_potus_-_us_military_strike_in_caribbean_sea.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">demanding</a> more information about the deployment. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is so far the only Republican to issue a condemnation of his own.
Last week, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) <a href="https://theintercept.com/2025/09/11/venezuela-boat-attack-trump-ilhan-omar/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">introduced</a> a resolution asserting congressional war powers and insisting that Trump end his campaign. But it remains unclear whether the resolution will receive a vote given Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-La.) efforts to avoid criticism of Trump.
The Pentagon has bristled at any attempts at congressional oversight. According to the Intercept, the Pentagon <a href="https://theintercept.com/2025/09/15/venezuela-boat-attack-trump-legality/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">prevented</a> staff members of several prominent lawmakers from attending a briefing on the airstrikes in an attempt to prevent leaks.
Subsequent leaks reveal why the Defense Department may have been concerned — and suggest that Trump’s description of Monday’s strikes may not reflect the full context of the attacks. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/10/us/trump-drug-boat-venezuela-strike.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">According</a> to The New York Times, the boat destroyed in the initial set of airstrikes was turning around when it was hit, casting doubt on the Pentagon’s claim that it posed an imminent threat to the United States.
“If someone is retreating, where’s the ‘imminent threat’ then?” a retired U.S. admiral told the Times. “Where’s the ‘self-defense’? They are gone if they ever existed — which I don’t think they did.”
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-doubles-down-on-drug-war-in-the-caribbean/">Trump Doubles Down on Drug War in the Caribbean</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-doubles-down-on-drug-war-in-the-caribbean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311510</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25257821230474-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" length="268563" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25257821230474-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>The Supreme Court Has Officially Blessed Racial Profiling</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-supreme-court-has-officially-blessed-racial-profiling/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-supreme-court-has-officially-blessed-racial-profiling</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-supreme-court-has-officially-blessed-racial-profiling/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Blum]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 16:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[TD Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[TD Original]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[brett kavanaugh]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[immigration and customs enforcement]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Operation at Large]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[racial profiling]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311475</guid>
<description><![CDATA["Shadow docket" ruling allows immigration agents to detain suspects based solely on their ethnicity, language, location and occupations. 
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-supreme-court-has-officially-blessed-racial-profiling/">The Supreme Court Has Officially Blessed Racial Profiling</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
In what may be its most reactionary ruling since <a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1850-1900/163us537" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Plessy v. Ferguson</a>, the Supreme Court decided on Sept. 8 to allow the <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trump</a> administration and <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/immigration-and-customs-enforcement/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="20" title="immigration and customs enforcement">Immigration and Customs Enforcement</a> to resume overt racial profiling in immigration raids in Los Angeles. The raids, which began in June under the title of <a href="https://calmatters.org/justice/2025/09/la-immigration-sweeps-supreme-court/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Operation At Large</a>, have resulted in some <a href="https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/08/26/secretary-noem-announces-dhs-arrest-5000th-illegal-alien-los-angeles-operations#:~:text=Secretary%20Noem%20Announces%20DHS%20Arrest,City%20in%20June%20%7C%20Homeland%20Security" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">5,000 arrests</a>.
The order was handed down in the case of <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Noem v. Perdomo</a> on the court’s emergency, or “shadow,” docket, which consists of cases decided on an expedited basis — without comprehensive briefing and without oral arguments — outside of the normal “merits docket.” The order lifts a lower-court injunction that had barred the administration from detaining suspected undocumented immigrants based solely on their ethnicity, language, geographic location and occupations.
Like most shadow docket rulings, the Perdomo order is bare-bones, comprising a single paragraph that fails to explain the court’s rationale for its decision. Nonetheless, it sends a clear message: If you are Latino, you’d better start carrying your identification papers with you — and they had better be in order. Otherwise, you will be subject to detention, and you might just find yourself on a deportation flight to El Salvador, South Sudan or Uganda. 
The Perdomo litigation originated with a <a href="https://www.aclusocal.org/sites/default/files/vasquez_perdomo_v_noem_-_first_amended_petition_and_complaint.pdf" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">lawsuit</a> filed on behalf of a group of immigration advocacy organizations and five individuals, including two U.S. citizens who contend they were detained by ICE during Operation At Large in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. On July 11, Los Angeles District Court Judge Maame E. Frimpong issued a <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.975351/gov.uscourts.cacd.975351.87.0_7.pdf" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">temporary restraining order</a> against the administration, finding that a “mountain of evidence” supported the plaintiffs’ claims that “roving patrols” of masked federal agents were conducting indiscriminate and sometimes violent dragnet-style immigration raids of workplaces and communities.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>It sends a clear message: If you are Latino, you’d better start carrying your identification papers with you.</blockquote></figure>
The court’s quick overturning of Frimpong’s TRO comes as no surprise. Although the court has a long history of entertaining emergency appeals that bypass the normal appeals process — such as last-minute requests for stays of execution in death penalty cases — no president has relied on the shadow docket more than <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a>. According to Georgetown University law professor and shadow docket scholar <a href="https://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/stephen-i-vladeck/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Steve Vladeck</a>, the first Trump administration <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/17/books/review/the-shadow-docket-stephen-vladeck.html#:~:text=THE%20SHADOW%20DOCKET:%20How%20the,percent%20of%20the%20court's%20decrees" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">sought</a> emergency relief 41 times. By comparison, the George W. Bush and Obama administrations filed a combined total of eight emergency relief requests over a 16-year period while the <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/joe-biden/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="5" title="Joe Biden" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Biden</a> administration <a href="https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-157-why-the-supreme-court-keeps" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">filed</a> 19 applications across four years.
During its recently completed 2024-25 term, the court’s shadow docket<a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/emergency/emergency-docket-2024/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank"> exploded</a> to more than 100 cases, fueled by the second Trump administration’s authoritarian power grab. In addition to Perdomo, the court has issued pro-Trump shadow docket orders <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1153_l5gm.pdf" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">permitting</a> noncitizens to be deported to third-party countries with histories of egregious human rights violations; <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/05/supreme-court-allows-trump-to-ban-transgender-people-from-military/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">barring</a> transgender people from serving in the military; <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/supreme-court-allows-trump-to-halt-millions-in-teacher-training-grants/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">withholding</a> $65 million in teacher training grants to states that include diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in their operations and curriculums; and <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/06/supreme-court-sides-with-trump-in-two-doge-suits/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">endorsing</a> the <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/doge/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="18" title="DOGE">Department of Government Efficiency</a>’s access to Social Security Administration records, to cite <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/emergency/emergency-docket-2024/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">just</a> a <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/emergency/emergency-docket-2025/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">few</a> instances.
And while shadow docket decisions are technically “interim” in nature — operating to remand cases to the lower courts for additional proceedings and leaving space for a possible return to the Supreme Court — they have enduring practical consequences. Unless and until the Supreme Court takes up the Perdomo case again, for example, ICE will be free to ramp up its roving masked raids in Los Angeles and other cities like Chicago, Baltimore and Washington, D.C. There are no longer any safe zones.
Of the high court’s six Republican ideologues, only Brett Kavanaugh explained his reasoning in Perdomo. In a poorly crafted opinion filled with misstatements of fact and law, Kavanaugh cited provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act and a 1975 Supreme Court case (<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1974/74-114" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">United States v. Brignoni-Ponce</a>) that authorize immigration agents to briefly detain and question individuals if they have a “reasonable suspicion” (less than probable cause but more than a hunch) that the person being questioned is an alien illegally in the country. From there, however, Kavanaugh dropped the proverbial ball by remarking, without any citations to the trial court’s evidentiary record:
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
The Government estimates that at least 15 million people are in the United States illegally. Many millions illegally entered (or illegally overstayed) just in the last few years. 
Illegal immigration is especially pronounced in the Los Angeles area, among other locales in the United States. About 10 percent of the people in the Los Angeles region are illegally in the United States—meaning about 2 million illegal immigrants out of a total population of 20 million. 
Not surprisingly given those extraordinary numbers, U.S. immigration officers have prioritized immigration enforcement in the Los Angeles area. The Government sometimes makes brief investigative stops to check the immigration status of those who gather in locations where people are hired for day jobs; who work or appear to work in jobs such as construction, landscaping, agriculture, or car washes that often do not require paperwork and are therefore attractive to illegal immigrants; and who do not speak much if any English. If the officers learn that the individual they stopped is a U. S. citizen or otherwise lawfully in the United States, they promptly let the individual go. If the individual is illegally in the United States, the officers may arrest the individual and initiate the process for removal.
</blockquote>
Given what he took for granted as the outsized illegal alien population in greater Los Angeles, Kavanaugh reasoned that it is “common sense” (his words, trust me) for ICE agents to detain any Latinos who fit the government’s criteria of suspicion based on their race, language or employment in low wage jobs.  
In a blistering 21-page dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by fellow Democrats Elena Kaga and Ketanji Brown Jackson, took Kavanaugh to school, instructing the former Yale frat boy that the reasonable suspicion standard requires …
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
“… an individualized suspicion that a particular citizen was engaged in a particular crime” beyond just a “demographic profile.” … 
The Fourth Amendment thus prohibits exactly what the Government is attempting to do here: seize individuals based solely on a set of facts that ‘describe[s] a very large category of presumably innocent’ people. … As the District Court correctly held, the four factors [the administration relies on]—apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, location, and type of work—are no more indicative of illegal presence in the country than of legal presence.
</blockquote>
Sotomayor also educated Kavanaugh on the harsh on-the-ground realities of Operation At Large, noting several examples from the trial court record of violence and intimidation. In the L.A. suburb of Glendale, for instance …
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
… nearly a dozen masked agents with guns “jumped out of … cars” at a Home Depot, and began “chasing and tackl[ing] Latino day laborers without “identify[ing] themselves as ICE or police, ask[ing] questions, or say[ing] anything else. … In downtown Los Angeles, agents “jumped out of a van, rushed up to [a tamale vendor], surrounded him, and handled him violently,” all “[w]ithout asking … any questions.
</blockquote>
In still another Home Depot encounter drawn from the evidentiary record, masked agents wearing bulletproof vests got out of a car and tear-gassed a crowd that had gathered to witness a raid. Far from being polite and respectful, Sotomayor continued, Operation At Large has sparked “panic and fear” across Los Angeles and its surrounding areas. “Countless people in the Los Angeles area,” she observed, “have been grabbed, thrown to the ground, and handcuffed simply because of their looks, their accents, and the fact they make a living by doing manual labor.”
The Fourth Amendment, she reminded her Republican colleagues, “protects every individual’s constitutional right to be free from arbitrary interference by law officers.”  Sadly, she concluded, after the Perdomo ruling, “that may no longer be true for those who happen to look a certain way, speak a certain way, and appear to work a certain type of legitimate job that pays very little.”
As a Supreme Court justice constrained by the need for collegiality on the bench, Sotomayor stopped short of denouncing Kavanaugh and the court’s Republicans as enablers of racism. There is no reason for the rest of us to feel so reserved.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-supreme-court-has-officially-blessed-racial-profiling/">The Supreme Court Has Officially Blessed Racial Profiling</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-supreme-court-has-officially-blessed-racial-profiling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311475</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ice_racial_profiling.png?width=878&height=585" length="1100989" type="image/png" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ice_racial_profiling.png?width=878&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Trump’s Phase 2 Has Begun</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trumps-phase-ii-has-begun/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=trumps-phase-ii-has-begun</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trumps-phase-ii-has-begun/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Reich / Substack ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[maga]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[stephen miller]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311469</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The effort to discredit all of his political opponents lacks popular support, and it will fail.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trumps-phase-ii-has-begun/">Trump’s Phase 2 Has Begun</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
We are now witnessing the start of what might be seen as Phase 2 of President <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a>’s efforts to eradicate political opposition.
Phase 1 has centered on silencing criticism. It has featured retribution toward people Trump deemed personal “enemies” — not just Democrats who had led the criticisms and prosecutions of him in his first term, but also Republicans and his own first-term appointees who subsequently criticized him, such as John Bolton.
Phase 1 also entailed an assault on universities that utilize so-called diversity, equity and inclusion, harbor faculty members and students who speak out critically against Benjamin Netanyahu’s genocide in Palestine or offer classes critical of the United States’ history toward Black people and Native Americans.
Finally, Phase 1 has gone after media that criticized Trump by withdrawing funding for public radio and television and relying on the billionaire owners of The Washington Post, ABC, CBS and X to suppress criticism of Trump on their media platforms.
Phase 2, it appears, will entail a more direct attack on all Trump’s political opponents, including the entire <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/democratic-party/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="12" title="democratic party" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Democratic Party</a>.
Trump has vowed to order troops into cities run by Democrats — Washington, Chicago, Memphis and New Orleans.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Phase 2, it appears, will entail a more direct attack on all Trump’s political opponents.</blockquote></figure>
He posted a video last week assailing Democratic mayors on crime, although crime rates have fallen sharply in recent years. “For far too long, Americans have been forced to put up with Democrat-run cities that set loose savage, bloodthirsty criminals to prey on innocent people,” he says in <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@WhiteHouse/posts/115175155559334769" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">the video</a>.
Meanwhile, he’s sending disaster relief to states run by Republicans and that he won in 2024, most recently announcing $32 million in aid for North Carolina, “which I WON BIG all six times, including Primaries,” suggesting that states run by Democrats will not receive such relief.
He has taken off the gloves with Democratic states and their representatives in Congress, virtually ordering the governors of Texas, Missouri, Indiana and Ohio to redistrict in order to come up with more Republican seats.
Another aspect of Phase 2 is his willingness to describe Democrats as “evil.” In a Fox News interview last week in which he complained about “excesses” by the left, he referred to Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist and front-runner for mayor of New York, as a “communist.”
In calling the entire <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/democratic-party/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="12" title="democratic party" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Democratic Party</a> the “radical left,” Trump seems eager to use the murder of Charlie Kirk to go after Democrats and liberals. Within hours of the murder, he declared that “we just have to beat the hell” out of “radical left lunatics,” and he has hammered Democrats and liberals as “vicious and … horrible.”
Trump’s Phase 2 thinking can be seen most vividly in the remarks of his deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, who is turning Kirk’s murder into a political cause. As <a href="https://x.com/StephenM/status/1966869396942630970" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Miller wrote on Saturday</a>:
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
“In recent days we have learned just how many Americans in positions of authority — child services, law clerks, hospital nurses, teachers, gov’t workers, even DOD employees — have been deeply and violently radicalized,” calling them “the consequence of a vast, organized ecosystem of indoctrination.”
</blockquote>
Miller continued:
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
“There is an ideology that has steadily been growing in this country which hates everything that is good, righteous and beautiful and celebrates everything that is warped, twisted and depraved. It is an ideology at war with family and nature. It is envious, malicious, and soulless. It is an ideology that looks upon the perfect family with bitter rage while embracing the serial criminal with tender warmth.
Its adherents organize constantly to tear down and destroy every mark of grace and beauty while lifting up everything monstrous and foul. It is an ideology that leads, always, inevitably and willfully, to violence—violence against those [who] uphold order, who uphold faith, who uphold family, who uphold all that is noble and virtuous in this world. It is an ideology whose one unifying thread is the insatiable thirst for destruction.”
</blockquote>
Miller has vowed to use the power of the government against MAGA’s political enemies, calling his political opponents “domestic terrorists” and warning:
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
“[T]he power of law enforcement under President Trump’s leadership will be used to find you, will be used to take away your money, take away your power, and, if you’ve broken the law, to take away your freedom.”
</blockquote>
Phase 2 must be understood against the backdrop of Trump’s rapidly declining popularity. The latest <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-approval-rating-42-weak-economy-reutersipsos-poll-shows-2025-09-09/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Reuters/Ipsos poll</a>, from Sept. 9, shows that only 32% of Americans support Trump’s deploying armed troops to large cities.
His economic policies are similarly unpopular. Only 36% approve of Trump’s handling of the economy, 30 % approve of his handling of cost of living and 16% support Trump’s having the power to set interest rates or tell companies where to manufacture products.
<a href="https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/52926-economic-concerns-ai-economic-effect-donald-trump-age-jeffrey-epstein-investigations-september-5-8-2025-economist-yougov-poll" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Other polls</a> show similar declines in support for Trump.
Trump’s Phase 2 aims to overcome these declining poll numbers by demonizing the Democratic Party, liberals and all other political opponents in an effort to divide the nation into those who are with Trump and those who are against him.
The overall goal is to make loyalty to Trump a litmus test of American patriotism.
I believe he will fail. Americans won’t fall for it. To the contrary: Trump’s Phase 2 will reveal the depths of his anti-democratic authoritarianism, from which even more Americans will recoil.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trumps-phase-ii-has-begun/">Trump’s Phase 2 Has Begun</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trumps-phase-ii-has-begun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311469</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25258013523455-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" length="402283" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25258013523455-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>As Data Center Demand Surges, the Grid Can’t Kick Its Gas Habit</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/as-data-center-demand-surges-the-grid-cant-kick-its-gas-habit/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=as-data-center-demand-surges-the-grid-cant-kick-its-gas-habit</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/as-data-center-demand-surges-the-grid-cant-kick-its-gas-habit/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deep Vakil / Inside Climate News ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Business & Economy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[big tech]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[data centers]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311466</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Big Tech’s AI frenzy is leaving the power grid stuck in natural gas-fueled inertia and slowing the arrival of clean energy projects.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/as-data-center-demand-surges-the-grid-cant-kick-its-gas-habit/">As Data Center Demand Surges, the Grid Can’t Kick Its Gas Habit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
This article originally appeared on <a href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/14092025/data-center-ai-demand-natural-gas-power/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Inside Climate News</a>, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that covers climate, energy and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter <a href="https://insideclimatenews.org/newsletter/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">here</a>.
Every three months, Jon Rea gets an up-close look at the possible future of the nation’s power grid, and lately he’s seeing a lot more natural gas.
Rea, a senior associate with the nonprofit RMI, analyzes the latest plans put out by U.S. electricity utilities for meeting projected demand over the coming decades. 
His <a href="https://rmi.org/the-state-of-utility-planning-2025-q2/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">most recent review</a> of all 128 plans found that utilities were looking to build twice as much natural gas capacity as they had anticipated just 18 months earlier.
The main reason for this shift: Utilities are rushing to accommodate the electricity needs of data centers, and projections of those needs keep rising. It’s a troubling trend for anyone concerned about the costs for ratepayers and the effects on the climate.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Utilities are rushing to accommodate the electricity needs of data centers.</blockquote></figure>
“Utilities that have updated their plans since the end of 2023 have added just a small amount of wind and solar capacity, 4 gigawatts, but a lot more gas capacity, 52 gigawatts,” said Rea, whose organization seeks to accelerate the energy transition. 
At first glance, utilities’ long-term plans seem to favor renewables overall, projecting wind and solar growth of 258 gigawatts versus natural gas additions of 102 gigawatts through 2035. But a closer look reveals the shift. 
Just one year back, these plans showed wind and solar could overtake natural gas as the nation’s biggest source of electricity generation by 2035. At the new rate, gas would keep reigning. 
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">AI Boosts Demand</h3>
U.S. tech giants are betting big on an AI future, but the power grid is still a relic of the past. 
Data centers — essentially warehouses for computers that form the backbone of the internet — are multiplying as companies add power-hungry servers for artificial intelligence. Some existing sites use as much energy as a <a href="https://blog.ucs.org/mike-jacobs/power-hungry-why-data-centers-are-developing-their-own-energy-sources-to-fuel-ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">small city</a>, and new ones are even bigger.
As a result, data centers, which used less than 2% of total U.S. electricity prior to 2018, consumed 4.4% in 2023 and are on track to make up anywhere between 6.7% and 12% by 2028. That’s according to a congressionally mandated <a href="https://escholarship.org/uc/item/32d6m0d1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">report</a> by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory last year.
After nearly <a href="http://eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=65264" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">two decades of flat demand</a>, the power grid — much of it running on equipment that is over half a century old — is scrambling to keep up. 
“It was designed to accommodate big central power plants that sent electricity in one direction down the lines to the customers,” said Todd Olinsky-Paul, senior director of the Clean Energy Group’s Resilient Power Project. 
It was not built for a system that has much more rooftop solar and home-based batteries, with electricity going to and from the customer.
Energy companies and regulators have been working for years to modernize the grid and move toward cleaner sources of energy. But when faced with a rapid increase in electricity demand, ambitions of just a few years have faded in favor of plans to rely heavily on new natural gas power plants — with everyone bearing the costs, from higher electricity bills to harmful climate impacts.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Resorting to Natural Gas</h3>
Experts say that utilities are leaning extensively on gas due in part to the inertia of existing regulatory processes and a tendency of the power sector to hype its demand outlook.
When utilities want to raise rates, they almost always have to make their case in public proceedings before a state commission. In most states, the regulator-approved rate hikes only account for the fixed costs of building new infrastructure, including plants and power lines. The fluctuating cost of the fuel that goes into running those plants is passed through to consumers on a rolling basis year after year. 
“Often the fuel price risk is ignored, probably intentionally ignored, by utilities when they speak with their regulators,” said Rob Gramlich, president of Grid Strategies, a D.C.-based consultancy focused on transmission and power markets. 
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Ambitions of just a few years have faded in favor of plans to rely heavily on new natural gas power plants.</blockquote></figure>
Gramlich, who <a href="https://www.energy.senate.gov/services/files/AF68ACFA-8FD9-4611-A936-76F4418E0C7C" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">testified</a> before a Senate committee in July about rising electricity demand, previously worked with a Republican chairman of the federal energy regulator as well as with the country’s biggest grid operator, PJM Interconnection. 
Among the reasons for utilities to favor gas is the rate-setting process, which makes it more profitable for utilities to opt for power plants in their territory rather than contracting for renewables, Gramlich said. 
“Renewables have been a little bit less attractive because often they’re in a neighboring service territory or spread around the region,” he said, and “they’re usually developed and owned by independent power producers.” 
Utilities also like to err on the side of caution. To avoid blackouts, they prefer to build more rather than less, which shows up in their off-the-charts projections. Since 2006, their 10-year growth forecasts have <a href="https://rmi.org/fast-flexible-solutions-for-data-centers/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">overshot reality by 17%</a> on average, according to an RMI analysis. 
That saddles customers with the bill for unneeded facilities. And it’s a particular risk in the current fast-changing environment.
Utilities are preparing to meet a <a href="https://rmi.org/the-state-of-utility-planning-2025-q2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">24% increase</a> in electricity demand by 2035, according to another RMI analysis. 
Jeremy Ortiz, a spokesperson for the Edison Electric Institute, a utility trade group, said in a statement, “Our members are investing more than <a href="https://www.eei.org/en/news/news/all/eei-releases-2024-financial-review" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">$1.1 trillion</a> in infrastructure projects nationwide over the next 5 years to help keep costs as low as possible for families and businesses while enabling the innovation America needs to win the AI race.”
Without regulatory changes, the costs will be effectively socialized across the customer base even though much of the growth is coming from one kind of customer — data centers.
“The typical rate-making structures are not set up for this because typically electrical infrastructure — generation, transmission, distribution lines — is paid for by the entire customer base, which is a reasonable assumption when you assume that everything is growing in a similar way,” said Cathy Kunkel, a North America energy consultant with the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. 
But today’s growth is coming from some of the world’s largest corporations, which are sparing no expense to win the AI arms race.
“Because the data centers are so enormous,” Kunkel said, “it’s a different paradigm.”
While this is playing out around the country, the most acute impacts are regionally concentrated. Northern Virginia is the world’s largest hub of data centers — and the utility that serves them, Dominion Energy, raised its capital expenditure by one-fifth to <a href="https://www.eei.org/-/media/Project/EEI/Documents/Issues-and-Policy/Finance-And-Tax/Financial_Review/FinancialReview_2024.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">$12 billion</a> last year, the largest jump for any investor-owned electric utility in the nation.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“We’re going to end up overbuilding generation, particularly overbuilding fossil-fuel generation.”</blockquote></figure>
Soaring electricity prices in Virginia, and throughout the wider <a href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/07082025/inside-clean-energy-pjm-utility-prices-soar/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Mid-Atlantic region</a>, have been attributed in large part to data centers. 
As Virginia strains to accommodate that growth, “we’re seeing data center companies right now seek out anywhere that they see perceived headroom or ability to power their load throughout the country,” said Lauren Shwisberg, a principal at RMI’s Carbon-Free Electricity Practice. 
Against this backdrop, many other states are courting data centers and their tax revenue, following in Virginia’s footsteps. 
But data centers don’t produce a lot of permanent local jobs, and they “may be effectively crowding out other forms of economic development” by siphoning large portions of the region’s available electricity away from other types of industrial and manufacturing investments, Kunkel noted.
Meanwhile, sparse information disclosed by data-center developers — and the speculative nature of many proposals on the cutting edge of tech — makes it harder to effectively plan the grid of the near future.
“It is worrisome that we’re going to end up overbuilding generation, particularly overbuilding fossil-fuel generation, which no one wants to see,” Kunkel said.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Blow to Clean Energy</h3>
Clean energy is literally waiting in line to help the grid out — and waiting, and waiting. 
Another <a href="https://emp.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/2024-04/Queued%20Up%202024%20Edition_R2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">report</a> from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory last year found that 95% of energy projects queued up at the end of 2023 for permission from grid operators to get connected were either solar, batteries or wind. The report noted that wait times are rising, from less than two years for projects completed in 2008 to nearly five years for those finished in 2023. Historically, just about one in five projects in the queue gets completed.
With all these projects in the pipeline, “we can meet the vast majority of the requirements for many of these data centers with pretty close to exclusively clean energy, if we had both the political apparatus and will to be able to do so,” said Jeremy Fisher, principal adviser on climate and energy with the Sierra Club’s environmental law program, who co-authored a <a href="https://www.sierraclub.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/demandingbetterwebsept2024.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">report</a> last September about leveraging growing electric demand for a cleaner grid.
At the federal level, with a president who has made no secret of his disdain for renewables, the will is now entirely absent. 
“The cancellation of permits, the difficulty of getting federal permits and the uncertainty and loss of tax credits are all very likely to reduce renewable energy growth in the next few years,” Grid Strategies’ Gramlich said, referring to <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trump</a> administration moves to discourage wind and solar. All of that compounds the effects of burgeoning demand, he said, “making clean energy targets more difficult to meet in a number of places.”
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Clean energy is literally waiting in line to help the grid out.</blockquote></figure>
Take Virginia’s example. The state passed the Virginia Clean Economy Act in 2020, setting staggered targets, under financial penalty, for investor-owned utilities to keep raising the share of carbon-free electricity in their statewide power sales, topping out at 100% in 2045 for Dominion. 
But Dominion’s long-term planning indicates that it might <a href="https://jlarc.virginia.gov/pdfs/reports/Rpt598.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">miss those targets</a>. In 2023, its modeling showed it might not meet the statutory requirement to retire all carbon-emitting power generation by 2045, citing “an increasing load forecast.” Last year’s plan said it was getting ready to collect fines for some of the years through 2040, when it expects to fall short of the targets. Those fines would pass to customers.
Dominion did not respond to requests for comment.
Even if compliance with the law was possible and compatible with high levels of data center growth, it would require “unprecedented investment in an ‘all-of-the-above’ strategy” on energy. That was the finding of a <a href="https://jlarc.virginia.gov/pdfs/presentations/JLARC%20Virginia%20Data%20Center%20Study_FINAL_12-09-2024.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">study</a> released in December by the state Legislature’s Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, which also said the state’s current regulatory practices “were not designed to account for this level and continued pace of large load growth from essentially a single customer type.”
In neighboring North Carolina, where data center construction is <a href="https://www.cbre.com/press-releases/north-carolina-data-center-construction-jumps-15x-as-cloud-and-artificial-intelligence-providers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">exploding</a>, the Republican-led Legislature last month <a href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/29072025/will-north-carolina-power-bill-reduction-act-work/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">dropped</a> a 2030 deadline for utility Duke Energy to slash its carbon emissions by 70%.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Risks to Consumers</h3>
Already, utility bills are rising as climate change drives more extreme weather and grid hardening costs. Deepening dependence on gas further piles on risks for ratepayers, and not only because gas worsens climate change. 
“When [gas prices] spike, that’s an instant rate increase outside the rate-case process that flows directly to your bill,” said Ted Thomas, founder of consultancy Energize Strategies and former chair of the Arkansas Public Service Commission. “If you’re a regulator, your consumers are twisting in the wind if they’re just sitting there eating those costs on both electricity and natural gas home heating.”
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“The people that think the only reason to do renewables is environmental, they get it wrong.”</blockquote></figure>
Then there’s the possibility of the political pendulum swinging back. Make energy investment decisions assuming the current federal policy environment won’t change, and “you’re probably going to get hammered,” Thomas said.
“The people that think the only reason to do renewables is environmental, they get it wrong,” Thomas said. His guidance for utility commissioners: “You’ve got to leave your ideology at home. … We can’t pretend that natural gas prices don’t spike because if they do, our constituents are going to have to pay for it.”
Some states are taking a hard look at the other major grid issue posed by data centers: everyone bearing the costs of that development. In July, utility American Electric Power got <a href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/17072025/inside-clean-energy-ohio-data-centers-penalties/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">buy-in</a> from state regulators in Ohio to make large data centers pay for at least 85% of their projected energy use each month, even if they end up needing less. A <a href="https://www.cesa.org/wp-content/uploads/Load-Growth.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">report</a> that same month from the Clean Energy States Alliance details other ways that officials are trying to make data centers pick up the tab — and stay the course on the clean-energy transition.
“The momentum was always at the state level,” said Olinsky-Paul, a co-author of that report. “States have a very good, effective ability to institute new policy and regulations and new programs to accelerate the deployment of clean energy resources. They know how to do it. They’ve been doing it for decades.” 
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/as-data-center-demand-surges-the-grid-cant-kick-its-gas-habit/">As Data Center Demand Surges, the Grid Can’t Kick Its Gas Habit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/as-data-center-demand-surges-the-grid-cant-kick-its-gas-habit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311466</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP24331768231102-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" length="399631" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP24331768231102-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>The Cooked-Up Case Against Lisa Cook</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-cooked-up-case-against-lisa-cook/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-cooked-up-case-against-lisa-cook</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-cooked-up-case-against-lisa-cook/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dean Baker / Beat the Press ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Business & Economy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[bill pulte]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[federal reserve]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[lisa cook]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[mortgage fraud]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311462</guid>
<description><![CDATA[It is unclear whether the Fed governor committed fraud—and why is Trump’s housing director rifling through the mortgage documents of his political opponents, anyway?
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-cooked-up-case-against-lisa-cook/">The Cooked-Up Case Against Lisa Cook</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
A few weeks back, Bill Pulte, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) director and the billionaire heir to a housing construction firm, claimed to have found evidence that Federal Reserve Board Gov. Lisa Cook had committed mortgage fraud. President <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> immediately tried to fire Cook from her position at the Fed, with the intention of getting another seat on the Fed’s seven-person board.
This attempted firing raised several serious questions. Most immediately, whether the FHFA director is supposed to be rifling through the mortgage documents of Trump’s political opponents. 
Previously, Pulte had claimed to have found evidence that California Sen. Adam Schiff had committed mortgage fraud. Schiff had led the first impeachment case against Trump in 2019 as a member of the House. Pulte also claimed to have found evidence of mortgage fraud by Letitia James, the attorney general of New York, who had gotten a civil conviction against Trump for, among other things, lying on loan forms. 
But it also raised questions about Trump’s power as president. While the Republican Supreme Court claimed to find wording in the Constitution that allowed the president to freely fire members of ostensibly independent agencies like the Federal Trade Commission, which oversees antitrust law, and the National Labor Relations Board, which monitors labor law violations, it also apparently found wording that prevented the president from behaving similarly toward the Fed. 
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>It was not clear that what Cook had allegedly done amounted to fraud.</blockquote></figure>
The Republican Supreme Court’s argument for the Fed’s special treatment was a bit more complicated, but it would only be a slight simplification to say that it was because the Fed is important. The court apparently accepted the argument of the vast majority of economists that it would be bad news to have a Fed under the complete control of the president. For this reason, they appeared to leave in place the preexisting standard for appointees of independent agencies, that they could only be removed for cause.
This is where Pulte’s accusation appeared useful. Trump could now pronounce Cook, a Black woman (like Letitia James), guilty of mortgage fraud, and therefore someone who could be fired for cause. This was never the open-and-shut case that Trump and his sycophants claimed.
First, it was not clear that what Cook had allegedly done amounted to fraud. According to Pulte, she had listed two different homes as primary residences on mortgage applications. If true, this may violate the law, but it is a common breach that is rarely prosecuted. It turns out three Trump Cabinet members, as well as Pulte’s parents, seem to have done the same thing. If Cook’s actions had violated the law, it probably ranks as something somewhat more serious than a traffic ticket, but considerably less serious than the spousal abuse that Trump laughed off as a real crime last week.
There was also the second point, that the alleged offense had occurred prior to Cook’s appointment to the Fed. Can “cause” refer to an action someone had done before being appointed to office? 
There were allegations of sexual assault against Trump Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth before his appointment. <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/rfk-jr/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="13" title="RFK JR" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Robert F. Kennedy Jr.</a> was an admitted heroin addict in his youth. While both Cabinet members are political appointees, who clearly hold their positions at the president’s discretion, would these past offenses in principle be grounds for removal for cause?
And then there is the final point. Cook was never proved to have done anything wrong. All Trump had was Pulte’s accusation of wrongdoing.
It turns out Pulte’s accusation is not worth very much. NBC News, among other outlets, <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/lisa-cook-federal-reserve-bank-documents-mortgage-fraud-allegations-rcna230964" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">obtained</a> loan documents showing that Cook had identified her Atlanta house as a “vacation home,” which would seem to be in full compliance with the law. The question is now whether Trump can fire a Fed governor over a seemingly false allegation from one of his political appointees. That seems to be a pretty clear-cut loss for Team Trump, but I can’t speak for the Republican Supreme Court.
Since we’re on the topic of Trump lies, let me digress for a moment to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. First, no one should in any way applaud this act. As my eighth-grade teacher told the 13-year-old idiots celebrating the shooting of George Wallace in 1972, you kill the movement, not the man. Like Wallace, Kirk was a real human being, with friends and family. His death is a tragedy.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Cook was never proved to have done anything wrong.</blockquote></figure>
But moving to the broader political context, Team Trump moved to weaponize the shooting before the body was even cold, blaming the left for the killing at a point where they knew nothing about the shooter. They looked to purges of the media, schools and universities, and all other institutions. 
Now that the suspect, Tyler Robinson, is in custody, it appears that the motivation for the killing was more likely to have come from the right than from the left. It’s still early, and more information will surely come out, but one thing that seems clear from this shooting is that it was done by a troubled young man who had too easy access to guns. The same is true of Thomas Cook, the 20-year-old man who shot Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, last summer.
Trump and his supporters are quick to blame these shootings on a mysterious “they,” implying that it is somehow part of a grand plot by the left. But like the charges against Cook, the story of the plot is a lie, invented entirely by Team Trump. Lying is apparently a way of life for those born into families with billions, but the rest of the country should not have to suffer the consequences of the lies from the rich and very rich. 
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-cooked-up-case-against-lisa-cook/">The Cooked-Up Case Against Lisa Cook</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-cooked-up-case-against-lisa-cook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311462</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25238487130525-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" length="469624" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25238487130525-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Trump FDA Seeks to Abandon Expert Reviews of New Drugs</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-fda-seeks-to-abandon-expert-reviews-of-new-drugs/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=trump-fda-seeks-to-abandon-expert-reviews-of-new-drugs</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-fda-seeks-to-abandon-expert-reviews-of-new-drugs/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Allen / KFF Health News ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 15:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Health & Wellness]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[alzheimers disease]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[big pharma]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[drug evaluation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical industry]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311432</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Critics say ending the decades-old practice would likely shield the agency’s decisions from public scrutiny.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-fda-seeks-to-abandon-expert-reviews-of-new-drugs/">Trump FDA Seeks to Abandon Expert Reviews of New Drugs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<a href="https://kffhealthnews.org/about-us" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">KFF Health News</a> is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at <a href="https://www.kff.org/about-us/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">KFF</a> — the independent source for health policy research, polling and journalism.
Food and Drug Administration leaders under President <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> are moving to abandon a decades-old policy of asking outside experts to review drug applications, a move critics say would shield the agency’s decisions from public scrutiny.
The FDA “would like to get away” from assembling panels of experts to examine and vote on individual drugs, because “I don’t think they’re needed,” said George Tidmarsh, head of the agency’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. He relayed the message Tuesday at a meeting of health care product makers and Wednesday to an FDA advocacy group.
In addition to being redundant, Tidmarsh said, advisory meetings on specific drugs were “a tremendous amount of work for the company and for the FDA. We want to use that work and our time to focus on the big questions.”
<a href="https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">The FDA’s advisory committees</a> were created in their current form by a 1972 law aimed at expanding and regulating the government’s use of experts in making technical decisions. They’re periodically summoned for advice, including to review evidence and vote on whether the FDA should approve drugs, vaccines and medical devices, often when officials face decisions that are not clear-cut.
FDA actions have traditionally aligned with committee votes. A departure can provoke controversy and public debate, as was the case with the split 2021 decision on whether to approve the Biogen drug Aduhelm to treat Alzheimer’s disease.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>FDA actions have traditionally aligned with committee votes.</blockquote></figure>
The FDA <a href="https://kffhealthnews.org/news/article/medicare-ruling-aduhelm-controversial-alzheimer-drug-critics/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">approved the drug</a> despite a “no” vote from its advisory committee, whose members felt the medicine did little to treat the disease. The conflict over Aduhelm laid bare the FDA’s struggle to reconcile pressure from industry and desperate patients with its rigorous evaluation of drug risks and benefits.
Tidmarsh said the committees would still be consulted on general issues like how to regulate different classes of drugs. But meetings on specific drugs, in which experts plow through piles of studies and hours of testimony from FDA and company officials, were mainly useful, he said, because they allowed the public to see how the FDA worked.
This month the FDA began publishing the “complete response letters” it sends to companies when it declines to approve their products. Release of the letters, which previously required the filing of a request under the federal Freedom of Information Act, promotes a level of transparency akin to the advisory meetings, Tidmarsh said.
Advisory committee meetings on individual drugs “are redundant when you have the complete review letters,” he told KFF Health News in a brief interview after appearing at the health care products conference.
Former FDA officials and academics who study the agency disagree. The meetings help FDA scientists make decisions and increase public understanding of drug regulation, and abandoning them doesn’t make sense, they said.
Tidmarsh’s reasoning is “hard to follow,” former FDA Commissioner Robert Califf told KFF Health News. “It’s extremely useful for people inside FDA to find out what other experts think before they make their final decisions. And it’s important to do that in a way that enables the public to understand the points of view.”
“Experts might ask questions of the company or FDA that neither of them thought of on their own,” said Holly Fernandez Lynch, an associate professor of bioethics and law at the University of Pennsylvania. “The public has few other opportunities to comment about FDA decisions.”
Spokespeople for the FDA and the Health and Human Services Department did not respond to repeated requests for elaboration on Tidmarsh’s comments.
Califf at times disagreed with advisory committees as commissioner of the agency and once floated the idea that it might be better if they deliberated but did not vote on products. Still, while “maybe someone can come up with a better one, I always thought it was an amazing system,” he said.
The FDA is not obliged to ask the outside experts to review drugs and usually hasn’t. It calls on them mainly for important new types of medications or when a decision is especially tricky because of high demand for a product that may have limited value, Aduhelm being a classic example.
The advisory committees are “an important resource” for the FDA, said Sarah Ryan, a spokesperson for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. “They can play an important part of the rigorous human drug review process we have in the U.S.”
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“The public has few other opportunities to comment about FDA decisions.”</blockquote></figure>
The committees are often asked to help settle disagreements within the FDA about how to move forward on a regulatory decision, said Reshma Ramachandran, a health services researcher and clinician at the Yale School of Medicine.
She and other researchers and former FDA officials praised FDA Commissioner Marty Makary’s decision to publish the complete response letters.
But the letters don’t obviate the need for committee meetings, said Peter Lurie, a former associate FDA commissioner who heads the Center for Science in the Public Interest.
“A disclosed complete response letter tells the public that a company’s application was rejected and why,” Lurie said. “An advisory committee meeting says to outside experts and the public, ‘Here’s what we’re thinking of doing and we’d love your input before we decide.’ Plainly, those are not equivalent.”
The changes Tidmarsh described are already playing out on the ground. The FDA has held only seven advisory committee meetings since Trump reentered the White House, compared with 22 over the same time frame last year. Officials say they will now release complete response letters as they are sent, and published a batch of 89 earlier in September.
Makary has to some extent <a href="https://www.politico.com/newsletters/prescription-pulse/2025/08/08/the-shrinking-number-of-advisory-committee-meetings-00499116" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">replaced the advisory committees</a> — whose members have traditionally been vetted for expertise and biases and are <a href="https://www.gsa.gov/policy-regulations/policy/federal-advisory-committee-management/legislation-and-regulations/federal-advisory-committee-act" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">required to deliberate in public</a> — with panels of handpicked scientists who support Makary’s views on subjects such as <a href="https://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2025/7/panel-urges-fda-to-remove-boxed-warning-on-women-s" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">hormone replacement therapy</a> and <a href="https://gooznews.substack.com/p/fda-advisory-committee-system-on" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">antidepressants</a>.
Diana Zuckerman, a critic of the drug industry, attended the <a href="https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/07/25/nx-s1-5477644/menopause-hormone-therapy-fda-health" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">July hormone replacement therapy panel</a> that considered the FDA’s black-box warning listing dangers of the treatment. Makary had <a href="https://oncodaily.com/blog/marty-makary-332760" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">wanted the warning removed</a> and packed the panel with like-minded experts.
The event was hastily called with no opportunity for the public to review discussion materials or comment on them, she said.
“All that was transparent was that they didn’t want to hear from anyone who disagreed with them,” said Zuckerman, who leads the National Center for Health Research.
Before becoming commissioner, Makary pushed for more advisory committee meetings. In early 2022, he blasted the FDA’s decision to approve COVID boosters for children 12 to 15 without consulting its Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. <a href="https://x.com/MartyMakary/status/1477430796780773376" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Makary posted</a> on social media at the time, “It is a slap in the face to science for @US_FDA to circumvent the standard convening of the expert advisory board.”
But Tidmarsh seems to disagree.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“All that was transparent was that they didn’t want to hear from anyone who disagreed with them.”</blockquote></figure>
Instead of asking an advisory committee to vote in favor of or against a Duchenne muscular dystrophy drug, for example, he said the FDA would be better served by a committee studying the best way to evaluate such drugs, such as which outcomes, or end points, to measure. “Is this end point correct for Duchenne muscular dystrophy? That’s an important question that cuts across many different companies,” he told KFF Health News.
FDA official Vinay Prasad canceled a planned July advisory committee meeting to discuss a Duchenne drug made by the biotech company Capricor Therapeutics. The FDA later published its complete response letter to Capricord rejecting its application. Capricor then published its own letter of response to the FDA. Prasad was later pushed out and rehired with fewer powers.
An advisory committee meeting could have worked through the drug’s risks and benefits in a calmer, public, less politicized atmosphere, Ramachandran said.
The FDA usually agrees with the votes of its several dozen advisory committees. A <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2807050" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">2023 study</a> found that the FDA agreed with 97% of “yes” votes and 67% of “no” votes.
That’s why Tidmarsh’s comments “come as a complete surprise,” said Genevieve Kanter, an associate professor of public policy at the University of Southern California who wrote commentary accompanying the study. The FDA has postponed a lot of meetings this year, but “everyone thought it was temporary, with the transition and all the firings.”
“Another theory is that this decision is strategic,” she said, “in terms of consolidating power in the agencies so that you are no longer accountable to outside experts or the public.”
<a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-fda-expert-reviews-of-new-drugs/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank"></a>
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-fda-seeks-to-abandon-expert-reviews-of-new-drugs/">Trump FDA Seeks to Abandon Expert Reviews of New Drugs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-fda-seeks-to-abandon-expert-reviews-of-new-drugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311432</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25113478411212-scaled.jpg?width=877&height=585" length="673017" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25113478411212-scaled.jpg?width=877&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Bezos to D.C.: Drop Dead</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/bezos-to-d-c-drop-dead/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=bezos-to-d-c-drop-dead</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/bezos-to-d-c-drop-dead/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete Tucker]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 15:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Business & Economy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[jeff bezos]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[washington d.c.]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[washington post]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311416</guid>
<description><![CDATA[How the billionaire's bizarre worldview and cosmic fantasies explain the Washington Post's abandonment of its hometown.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/bezos-to-d-c-drop-dead/">Bezos to D.C.: Drop Dead</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
The following story is co-published with <a href="https://petetucker.substack.com/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Pete Tucker’s Substack</a>.
Shortly after Jeff Bezos touched back down to earth in 2021, he credited those who made his space exploration possible. “I want to thank every Amazon employee and every Amazon customer, ‘cause you paid for all of this,” Bezos <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/jeff-bezos-thanks-amazon-workers-blue-origin-launch-revealingly-tone-ncna1274565" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">enthused</a> while decked out in his blue space suit.
That same year, an internal report noted that Amazon was churning through employees at such a brisk clip that the company feared exhausting the labor pool of the entire United States, a country of over 300 million people. “If we continue business as usual, Amazon will deplete the available labor supply in the US network by 2024,” stated the report, which was <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/23170900/leaked-amazon-memo-warehouses-hiring-shortage" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">obtained by Vox</a>.
Amazon’s relentless churn — <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/15/us/politics/amazon-warehouse-workers.html" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">150% a year</a> for warehouse workers — was, for Bezos, a feature, not a bug. “In his drive to create the world’s most efficient company, Jeff Bezos discovered what he thought was another inefficiency worth eliminating: hourly employees who spent years working for the same company,” the New York Times noted <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/15/briefing/amazon-warehouse-investigation.html" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">in a newsletter</a> accompanying its 2021 <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/06/15/us/amazon-workers.html" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">investigation of Amazon</a>:
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
Longtime employees expected to receive raises. … And they were a potential source of internal discontent. 
Bezos came to believe that an entrenched blue-collar work force represented “a march to mediocrity,” as David Niekerk, a former Amazon executive who built the company’s warehouse human resources operations, told the Times. …
In response, Amazon encouraged employee turnover. After three years on the job, hourly workers no longer received automatic raises, and the company offered bonuses to people who quit. It also offered limited upward mobility for hourly workers.
</blockquote>
Bezos’ indifference to the workers whose backbreaking labor made him rich is remarkable. And it has me wondering where the rest of us fit into Bezos’ worldview.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">‘A Thousand Mozarts’</h3>
Jeff Bezos has long believed that he can save humanity, but only by placing Earth’s heavy industries on the moon, then shipping manufactured products back to Earth, and leaving the pollution behind.
“The Earth is finite,” a teenage Bezos told his local newspaper, “and if the world economy and population is to keep expanding, space is the only way to go.”
“I still believe that,” Bezos said four decades later, while doing his best Steve Jobs impersonation on a darkened stage at the D.C. convention center with a captive audience of students looking on.<a href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!WWuQ!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F208ed469-1a72-4d19-95cd-df3d9adce5fb_1820x994.heic" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow"></a>
With population and energy use growing exponentially, we’re on a “bad path” that leads to “rationing,” Bezos explained. But not to worry! With all the fervor of a snake oil salesman, Bezos continued:
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
The good news is that if we move out into the solar system, for all practical purposes we have unlimited resources. So we get to choose: Do we want stasis and rationing? Or do we want dynamism and growth? This is an easy choice.
</blockquote>
By placing heavy industry in space, “Earth ends up zoned residential and light industry,” explained Bezos, who also made an excited pitch for humans living in space. “We can have a trillion humans in the solar system. Which means we’d have a thousand Mozarts and a thousand Einsteins. This would be an incredible civilization,” Bezos said.
And the weather! “These are ideal climates, these are shirtsleeve environments. This is Maui on its best day all year long. No rain, no storms, no earthquakes,” Bezos said in his 2019 talk, humbly entitled “For the Benefit of Earth.”
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">‘Directly in the first lady’s pocket’</h3>
I don’t begrudge Bezos for having a rich fantasy life. And if he wants to flit away his billions flying himself and his friends into space, I wish him all the best. Where I draw the line is at public funding.
Why billionaires like Bezos feel entitled to tap the public purse for their fantasies is beyond me. But that’s what Bezos is doing with his space company, Blue Origin, which is his true passion.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Without federal contracts, “Blue is dead in the water.”</blockquote></figure>
“He cares most about Blue Origin,” a longtime Bezos adviser <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/00e81e1a-a38f-4d45-89e8-0e8c162572b8" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">told</a> the Financial Times. But without federal contracts, “Blue is dead in the water,” said the adviser. “[Bezos’] chance of being the player he wants to become in space could be destroyed” if he doesn’t stay in President <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a>’s good graces.
So showering the first family with donations and sweetheart deals makes sense. My personal favorite is the $40 million Amazon paid for Melania Trump’s documentary, of which roughly $28 million goes “directly in the first lady’s pocket,” the Financial Times <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/00e81e1a-a38f-4d45-89e8-0e8c162572b8" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">reported</a>. The eye-popping sum makes it “probably the most expensive documentary ever paid for in history,” filmmaker Alex Holder <a href="https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/trump-family-election-cash-bonanza-2f5f8714?st=k8deQk" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">told</a> the Wall Street Journal.
This largesse is at best a rounding error for both Amazon, a company valued at over $2 trillion, and Bezos, who’s worth over $200 billion. But the potential upside is immense, as things can quickly go awry when Trump’s hand is on the public money spigot, as Bezos is well aware.<a target="_blank" href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!aYhl!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F16abde6b-1c65-42cc-9cb2-5a2904342832_2084x1354.heic" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow"></a>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">‘A surprising decision’</h3>
During Trump’s first term, a joke went around that the Washington Post didn’t cost Bezos $250 million — the amount he bought the paper for in 2013 — but $10 billion.
The latter figure represents the size of a Pentagon cloud computing contract that Amazon lost out on after Trump became enraged at the coverage he was receiving in the Post.
The $10 billion contract instead went to Microsoft. “It was a surprising decision since Amazon Web Services was the industry leader in cloud computing and was judged by many to have presented a stronger bid,” the Wall Street Journal <a href="https://www.wsj.com/politics/what-game-is-jeff-bezos-playing-aa12dda3?mod=hp_lead_pos7" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">reported</a>.
Amazon promptly sued, and the $10 billion contract was eventually broken into four components, one of which Amazon secured.
But Bezos was “deeply hurt” by the ordeal, the Financial Times <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/00e81e1a-a38f-4d45-89e8-0e8c162572b8" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">reported</a>. “He sat there going: ‘This is not right.’”
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“He’s prioritizing his other businesses over the Post.”</blockquote></figure>
Having learned his lesson about crossing Trump, Bezos quietly reached out when it looked like the former president might return to office in 2024. Bezos even <a href="https://www.axios.com/2025/02/27/jeff-bezos-trump-tech-alliance" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">suggested</a> to Trump that he select North Dakota Gov, Doug Burgum as his running mate. (Trump named Burgum to his Cabinet, as interior secretary.)
Bezos’ alignment with Trump only became public in the days before the election, when Bezos <a href="https://fair.org/home/bezos-declaration-of-neutrality-confirms-billionaires-arent-on-your-side/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">personally spiked</a> the Post’s endorsement of <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/kamala-harris/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="3" title="Kamala Harris" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kamala Harris</a>.
Once Trump won, Bezos quickly sought to <a href="https://fair.org/home/to-cozy-up-to-trump-bezos-banishes-dissent-from-wapo/?fbclid=IwY2xjawIvG_ZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHXOb5Q4Ib6CbQbL5n4lUf_bUk-c3djzD71NVQiApiuQUn2Ak_PAts5zLtw_aem_QTN-B6-PWBHWZ9AtpuvMIg" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">remake his paper</a> in the president’s image, thereby ensuring neither Amazon nor Blue Origin would lose out on billions in federal contracts.
“He’s prioritizing his other businesses over the Post,” former Post executive editor Marty Baron <a href="https://zeteo.com/p/jeff-bezos-washington-post-opinion-marty-baron-reaction-trump?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2325511&post_id=157913728&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=jyjn&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">told</a> Zeteo.
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
Amazon has a big cloud computing business. Blue Origin is wholly dependent on the U.S. government. Trump can just decide that they’re not going to get any contracts. Is he going to put that at risk? Obviously, he’s not going to put that at risk.
<div style="height:30px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>
</blockquote>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Bezos to D.C.: Drop dead</h3>
While Post reporters continue to produce some excellent journalism, the paper’s transformation on the opinion side is so complete that when Trump carried out a military occupation of Washington, D.C. — the city the Post calls home — the editorial page all but <a href="https://fair.org/home/wapo-editors-doing-their-best-to-conceal-reporters-vital-work-on-dc-occupation/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">rolled out the red carpet</a>.
This is an extraordinary dereliction of journalistic duty. It’s also a fuck you to the local readers and businesses who have kept the Post viable over generations. (To experience Bezos’ fuck you in physical form, pick up a paper copy of the Post and try to find the Metro section, now buried in the back of Sports or Style.)
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“The reason he’s earning so much money is to get to outer space.”</blockquote></figure>
But I suppose we should have seen this coming. After all, if Bezos can dispose of the Amazon workers who made him rich, why should we expect him to treat D.C. residents and Post readers any better?
In Bezos’ world, he’s Player One, on an intergalactic quest to save humanity. The rest of us are NPCs (nonplayer characters). And earthly matters like journalistic integrity and democracy are beside the point.
To Bezos’ credit, he’s always been transparent about his solipsistic worldview. So have some of those around him.
“Whatever image he had of his own future, it always involved becoming wealthy. … There was no way to get what he wanted without it,” Bezos’ high school girlfriend Ursula Werner told reporters in the 1990s, according to author Brad Stone’s “The Everything Store.”
And what exactly did Bezos want? “The reason he’s earning so much money is to get to outer space.”
The rest of us — Amazon workers, Post readers, etc. — are just flotsam and jetsam.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/bezos-to-d-c-drop-dead/">Bezos to D.C.: Drop Dead</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/bezos-to-d-c-drop-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311416</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25096161458986-scaled.jpg?width=891&height=585" length="374035" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25096161458986-scaled.jpg?width=891&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Greenwashing Debt in the Galápagos Islands</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/greenwashing-debt-in-the-galapagos-islands/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=greenwashing-debt-in-the-galapagos-islands</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/greenwashing-debt-in-the-galapagos-islands/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sophia Boddenberg / NACLA ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 15:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Americas]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Business & Economy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Social Justice]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[debt-for-nature swap]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[ecuador]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Galápagos]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[greenwashing]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311427</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Ecuador’s historic debt-for-nature swap promises to bridge the international funding gap for biodiversity conservation, but island residents say it erodes sovereignty and empowers foreign interests.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/greenwashing-debt-in-the-galapagos-islands/">Greenwashing Debt in the Galápagos Islands</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
The Galápagos Islands harbor some of the most distinctive ecosystems on the planet. Their isolated location in the middle of the Pacific Ocean has allowed species to evolve independently from their relatives on the mainland over millions of years. Creatures such as Darwin’s finches, giant tortoises and marine iguanas are found only on the Galápagos Islands. It was here, 600 miles west of the South American mainland, that Charles Darwin gathered insights that shaped his theory of evolution.
In 1959, the Ecuadorian government founded the Galápagos National Park, protecting around 97% of the archipelago’s landmass. It was the country’s first national park. In 2022, the government expanded the Galápagos Marine Reserve by 60,000 square kilometers with the creation of the Hermandad Marine Reserve, bringing the total protected area to 198,000 square kilometers — almost half the size of mainland Ecuador. But there was a problem: The Ecuadorian state lacked the funding required to protect this vast marine territory.
In May 2023, then-President Guillermo Lasso therefore announced the largest debt-for-nature swap in history. The Ecuadorian state bought back bonds worth $1.63 billion from international bondholders at a discount and exchanged them for a new loan of $656 million to be invested in marine conservation. The government hailed the deal as a “historic agreement” that would help to protect endangered species such as whales and turtles, as well as promote sustainable fisheries and strengthen climate resilience. Ecuador was as wealthy as any of the richest countries in the world, the Ecuadorean foreign minister said, “but our currency is the biodiversity.” The idea behind debt-for-nature swaps is simple: A heavily indebted country like Ecuador reduces its debt burden while promising to allocate funds to environmental or marine conservation. In doing so, nature is increasingly treated as a tradable commodity. It seems like a win-win outcome. But who truly benefits from this arrangement?
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>In doing so, nature is increasingly treated as a tradable commodity.</blockquote></figure>
“We had no idea there was a debt-for-nature swap — we found out about it through social media,” said Patricia Moreno, a human rights and environmental activist who lives on San Cristóbal, the easternmost island in the Galápagos archipelago. Home to around 6,000 people, it has the second-largest human population in the islands. Moreno said islanders are routinely excluded from the conversation when it comes to conservation. “We exist,” she said. “And we are more than just predators.”
Moreno remembers when Lasso visited the Galápagos Islands in 2023 to announce the agreement. At the time, residents were already protesting a supply crisis. A recent shipwreck had disrupted deliveries, leading to shortages of basic goods like eggs, rice and potatoes. Located hundreds of miles off the Ecuadorian coast, the islands rely on shipments of food and fuel from the mainland by ship and plane. “People were already angry,” Moreno recalled. “And when we learned about the debt-for-nature swap, we got even angrier. We had no information about it. Some even thought that the islands had been traded away and now belonged to another country.”
Moreno said the public wasn’t consulted on the agreement, nor were Galápagos residents invited to the president’s announcement. Only political authorities and tourism industry representatives were present. “We felt like we meant nothing,” Moreno said. She began organizing with other islanders to find out what the debt-for-nature swap was really about and reclaim their right to information, consultation and participation.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Gambling With Government Debt Is Lucrative</h3>
The Galápagos Islands’ debt-for-nature swap was the largest to date, but it was not the first. These types of deals have been around since the 1980s. Bilateral debt-for-nature swaps involve one country negotiating directly with another to forgive or restructure debt in return for conservation commitments. Commercial swaps involve private third parties — such as nongovernmental agencies, investment firms or banks — purchasing discounted government bonds from the debtor country on the secondary market. Commercial swaps have taken place in the Seychelles, Belize, Barbados and, most recently, Ecuador.
In the case of Ecuador’s Galápagos deal, the investment bank Credit Suisse facilitated the buyback of more than $1.6 billion in sovereign bonds for the Ecuadorian government. These bonds had fallen in value due to Ecuador’s high national debt and political instability, making them attractive for repurchase. Although the identities of the bondholders are not publicly known, they likely include international investment funds, insurance companies and pension funds.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Moreno said the public wasn’t consulted on the agreement.</blockquote></figure>
To finance the buyback of the bonds, a special purpose vehicle (SPV) named GPS Blue Financing was established in Ireland, which is known for its favorable tax regime. This entity issued a new set of “Galápagos Marine Bonds.” In this transaction, Ecuador was the borrower, GPS Blue Financing was the lender and the Bank of New York Mellon acted as the facility agent, a kind of intermediary. According to Bloomberg News, one of the major investors in the new bonds was the Swedish pension fund Alecta, which has faced criticism for high-risk investments and allegations of corruption. Alecta was also involved in the 2021 Belize swap, which was similarly arranged by Credit Suisse. Credit Suisse was the leading bank to arrange debt-for-nature swaps for a long time, until it collapsed in 2023 following several bribery scandals, after which it was taken over by another bank.
To reduce the risk for investors and lower the cost of borrowing for the Ecuadorian state, the U.S. Development Finance Corp. provided a $656 million guarantee in the event of default — equal to the total value of the bonds. Additionally, the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) provided $85 million to cover the first six interest payments if Ecuador defaulted. These guarantees mean that investors bear very little financial risk, while banks can market the deal as a commitment to marine conservation.
After Credit Suisse collapsed in 2023, its former head of debt-for-nature swaps, Ramzi Issa — who handled the Galápagos deal — founded his own company in 2025: Enosis Capital, a so-called impact credit fund specializing in sustainable financial transactions. Business is booming because gambling with government debt is lucrative. Investors are keen to sell government bonds issued by highly indebted countries in the Global South — known in financial jargon as “junk-rated issuers” — at a good price. Wealthy investors and banks buy debt cheaply, secure public guarantees and profit from restructuring it into conservation-based loans.
Meanwhile, it was these same Western financial institutions, backed by U.S. monetary policy, that caused the debt crisis in the Global South in the first place by offering high-interest loans on predatory terms.
Despite this backdrop, the United Nations, the World Bank, the European Union and U.S. conservation organizations are presenting debt-for-nature swaps as a promising solution to the biodiversity conservation funding gap. At the U.N. Biodiversity Conference in Colombia in October 2024, groups like the Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund, Pew Charitable Trusts, Conservation International and Re:wild formed a coalition to advocate for these instruments. In a joint statement, they described debt-for-nature swaps as “a win-win for governments, local communities and nature,” and as “one of the largest potential sources of funding to help achieve the global climate and nature goals.”
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The Myth of “Win-Win”</h3>
The new wave of debt-for-nature and debt-for-climate swaps is being framed by Global North institutions as a solution to both sovereign debt crises and conservation funding shortfalls. These instruments, they argue, can channel new financing into developing countries with high biodiversity by turning ecological stewardship into a service that wealthier nations pay for — while incentivizing creditors to offer debt relief. This is an important debate in the context of climate and development policy because the lack of adequate funding for biodiversity conservation remains an urgent and unresolved issue. But behind the technocratic language of innovation and efficiency lie deeper political questions: Who benefits, and who bears the burden?
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, adopted in 2022, calls for protecting 30% of land and marine areas by 2030 — a goal commonly referred to as “30 by 30.” The framework also stipulates that those countries most responsible for ecosystem destruction — wealthy, industrialized nations — should provide financial support for conservation efforts in poorer countries. But according to a report on debt-for-climate swaps by the Latin American Network for Economic, Social and Climate Justice (LATINDADD), 80% of climate finance is delivered in the form of loans. This allows rich countries to shift the burden to the private sector while avoiding the use of public funds. “Many countries in the Global South spend less than 1% of their budget on environmental protection, but more than 20% on debt servicing,” said Carola Mejía, an economist with LATINDADD. “Debt-for-nature swaps distract from the fact that the countries responsible for the climate and environmental crises are not fulfilling their international commitments.”
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="688" src="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22015830803263.jpg?width=1024&height=688" alt="" class="wp-image-311429" srcset="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22015830803263-scaled.jpg?width=1024&height=688 1024w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22015830803263-scaled.jpg?width=300&height=202 300w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22015830803263-scaled.jpg?width=768&height=516 768w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22015830803263-scaled.jpg?width=268&height=180 268w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22015830803263-scaled.jpg?width=402&height=270 402w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22015830803263-scaled.jpg?width=603&height=405 603w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22015830803263-scaled.jpg?width=871&height=585 871w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22015830803263-scaled.jpg?width=2000 2000w" sizes="(max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px" data-recalc-dims="1" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A giant tortoise at the Galapagos National Park in Puerto Ayora, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador, on Jan. 14, 2022. (AP Photo/Dolores Ochoa)</figcaption></figure>
Mejía argues that instead of promoting new debt instruments, the international community should prioritize financing mechanisms for climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation that do not generate new debt. As the main perpetrators of the climate crisis, industrialized countries in the Global North should meet their obligations and provide funds directly in the form of grants or reparations. Together with LATINDADD, Mejía supports the global movement “Debt for Climate,” which campaigns for debt relief for countries in the Global South. “Debt is a neocolonial mechanism that controls our countries,” she said. Debt-for-nature swaps reinforce the narrative that debt is the fault of countries in the Global South, rather than the result of exploitative practices by powerful nations and international financial institutions. In this sense, swaps often serve as a tool for greenwashing and perpetuating debt.
In response, LATINDADD and the Ecuadorian human rights group Centro de Derechos Económicos y Sociales (CDES) have proposed a set of “High-Integrity Principles for Debt Swaps.” Released in October of last year, their report emphasizes transparency, independent auditing and monitoring, democratic participation and equitable distribution of benefits. It also sharply criticizes the Galápagos deal for its lack of transparency and for excluding local actors from decision-making and resource management. In May 2024, CDES and several Galápagos-based organizations filed a formal complaint to the Inter-American Development Bank’s Independent Consultation and Investigation Mechanism (MICI), an office that addresses complaints about possible harms caused by IDB-financed projects. “There are so many needs in the community, and we want to participate,” said Patricia Moreno, who was involved in the complaint alongside members of the Asamblea Comunitaria San Cristóbal. “Local organizations also need support for social and conservation projects, but it’s always the same NGOs that receive the funding.”
After two months of negotiations, an agreement was reached between the representatives of 24 civil society organizations, the IBD, Ecuador’s Ministry of Economy and Finance, and the Ministry of Environment, Water and Ecological Transition. The deal guarantees, among other points, that local communities have public access to information about the Galápagos Life Fund — the entity managing conservation funds from the debt swap — and commits at least 18% of its funding to local social and community groups on the Galápagos Islands. It also establishes a permanent observer role for community representatives on the fund’s board. MICI will monitor the implementation of the agreement.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="d1e117">The Conservation Elite</h3>
Lorenzo Idrovo, who was born and raised in the Galápagos Islands and also took part in the complaint, is critical of how conservation is managed on the archipelago. “There’s a very elitist discourse coming from the NGOs, as if the local population doesn’t exist,” he said. His two children attend a public school where the roof is damaged, the tables are broken and basic school materials are lacking. Meanwhile, a biologist friend of his studying sharks uses advanced equipment with sophisticated technology to listen to the heartbeats and perform ultrasounds on pregnant sharks. “Many of the children here have never even heard their own heartbeat,” Idrovo observed, “because the health centers don’t have that kind of equipment. There is a conservation elite made up of large NGOs managing millions of dollars. We’re only asking for a small percentage to go toward social needs — because without social justice, conservation is impossible.”
In biodiversity-rich regions like the Galápagos, conservation is increasingly dictated by international NGOs — particularly U.S.-based organizations. Among the most influential is the Nature Conservancy, a major proponent of debt-for-nature swaps. The organization has been involved in debt swaps in the Seychelles, Belize and Barbados, with more agreements reportedly in the pipeline. Through its Blue Bonds for Conservation model, it claims these arrangements will improve management across more than 4 million square kilometers of ocean. But for critics like researcher Andre Standing, such approaches represent the financialization of conservation — a trend in which financial institutions and conservation NGOs gain increasing control over vast ecosystems and sovereign territories in heavily indebted countries through market-based instruments.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“There’s a very elitist discourse coming from the NGOs, as if the local population doesn’t exist.”</blockquote></figure>
The Galápagos are no exception, with international conservation organizations holding considerable power and influence over the islands. These include the Galápagos Conservancy and Re:wild from the United States, the United Kingdom’s Galápagos Conservation Trust, Belgium’s Charles Darwin Foundation, Switzerland’s World Wide Fund for Nature and Ecuador’s own Jocotoco. While conservation is officially managed by the Galápagos National Park, most of the funding comes from international foundations, organizations and trust funds. In early 2025, for instance, the Bezos Earth Fund — backed by U.S. billionaire and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos — donated a ship equipped with modern monitoring technology worth around $800,000 to the park.
There is also a kind of revolving door between leading roles at the national park and top positions at these NGOs; according to sources on the islands, high-ranking figures in the park used to direct one of these organizations, and vice versa. These dynamics create, on one hand, a dependency of Ecuadorian public institutions on international funding and, on the other, the consolidation of a kind of “conservation elite,” a small group of individuals holding influential positions in conservation management — both of which undermine democratic oversight and exclude local communities from decision-making and the management of funds.
The Galápagos Life Fund (GLF), which manages the debt-for-nature swap funds, is based in the U.S. state of Delaware — a well-known tax haven. The fund was established with assistance from Baker McKenzie, the law firm implicated in the Pandora Papers revelations for facilitating offshore financial secrecy. GLF’s board is composed of 11 members: six from the private sector and five from government ministries. This means the Ecuadorian state is in the minority. Private board members include representatives from the Pew Bertarelli Ocean Legacy project, a partnership between Swiss billionaire Dona Bertarelli and the Pew Charitable Trusts, founded by heirs of a U.S. oil company.
Over the next 18½ years, the Galápagos Life Fund will distribute $12 million per year to marine conservation efforts in the Galápagos Islands. Half will go to state institutions; the other half to local projects for which organizations and companies can apply. Over the next three years, $6 million of that total will be invested annually in the control and monitoring of marine protected areas, to be overseen by the armed forces, the National Park Directorate and the Undersecretariat of Fisheries. Yet, according to multiple sources interviewed for this story, the funds do not go directly to the Ecuadorian state but to the NGOs Re:wild and Jocotoco, which will manage them on behalf of the GLF. Among other things, the money will be used to repair ships and improve satellite systems for monitoring the Galápagos and Hermandad marine protected areas. Two years after the announcement of the debt-for-nature swap for the Galápagos Islands, it remains unclear whether the funds will genuinely benefit marine ecosystems or primarily serve the interests of private investors and NGOs.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="d1e141">Militarization or Sovereignty</h3>
The new Hermandad Marine Reserve, located between the Galápagos Islands and Costa Rica’s Cocos Island, is an important migration route for sea turtles, whales and rays. It is one of the most species-rich areas on the planet and is therefore particularly popular with industrial fishing fleets. To prevent illegal fishing in the marine reserve, Ecuador’s military and the national park are set to increase patrols in the area.
The reserve is not only a migration route for marine species — it’s also a transnational corridor for the international drug trade. In 2024, the Washington Post described the Galápagos Islands as a “gas station for drug smugglers” en route from South America to the United States. The recently reelected right-wing President Daniel Noboa has signed a security cooperation agreement with the United States that allows the presence of U.S. ships and submarines in the waters surrounding the islands in order to combat organized crime on the sea. Noboa is also planning to set up a U.S. military base on the Galápagos Islands.
Islanders like Idrovo and Moreno are concerned about the plans for a military base. Together with over 50 organizations, they have started a campaign against the proposed base, under the slogan: “Galápagos, natural sanctuary, not a military base.” In a joint declaration, the coalition stated: “The militarization of our islands is incompatible with their natural sanctuary status and threatens decades of conservation efforts. … This decision violates our Constitution, ignores the right to prior consultation of local communities and compromises Ecuadorian sovereignty.”
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22014827661192.jpg?width=1024&height=683" alt="" class="wp-image-311430" srcset="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22014827661192-scaled.jpg?width=1024&height=683 1024w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22014827661192-scaled.jpg?width=300&height=200 300w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22014827661192-scaled.jpg?width=768&height=512 768w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22014827661192-scaled.jpg?width=270&height=180 270w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22014827661192-scaled.jpg?width=405&height=270 405w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22014827661192-scaled.jpg?width=608&height=405 608w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22014827661192-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585 878w, https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22014827661192-scaled.jpg?width=2000 2000w" sizes="(max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px" data-recalc-dims="1" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Former U.S. President Bill Clinton puts on a protective face mask sitting next to Ecuador’s then-President Guillermo Lasso at a signing ceremony that expanded the Galapagos Maritime Reserve by 60,000 square kilometers in Puerto Ayora, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador, on Jan. 14, 2022. (AP Photo/Dolores Ochoa)</figcaption></figure>
While it is unclear whether the security agreements between Ecuador and the United States are linked to the debt-for-nature swap, both initiatives signal a troubling shift: the erosion of democratic structures in Ecuador that threaten the state’s sovereignty over resource management and conservation strategies. Together, they consolidate power in the hands of U.S.-based organizations, financial institutions and the military at the expense of national autonomy.
Social movements argue that the notion of a benevolent debt swap diverts attention from more transformative proposals, such as debt cancellation, which could free up national budgets for environmental initiatives without deepening financialization or eroding the sovereignty of Global South nations. Still, some contend that, under the right conditions, debt-for-nature swaps could play a constructive role. Daniel Ortega Pacheco, Ecuador’s former environment minister and an expert in sustainable finance and debt-for-nature swaps, believes the Galápagos debt swap could offer valuable lessons for the future if grounded in a transparent, inclusive and resilient global regulatory framework. “The countries involved should be strengthened, not undermined, in their democratic structures and autonomy,” he insists.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“The banks, NGOs, and investors make money from these deals.”</blockquote></figure>
Like Idrovo and Moreno, Ortega Pacheco emphasizes that long-term conservation is most effective when rooted in the needs and participation of local communities. “It has been proven that managing nature reserves with the involvement of local communities is cheaper and more sustainable in the long term,” he observed. In contrast, he is critical of what he calls “parastatal structures” — namely international NGOs — that restrict state autonomy, privatize resource management and operate without independent oversight. “It is naive to believe that those involved in debt-for-nature swaps are acting out of philanthropy,” Ortega Pacheco added. “The banks, NGOs, and investors make money from these deals.”
The debt-for-nature swap in the Galápagos reveals not only asymmetrical power dynamics in conservation policy and financing, but also the colonial logic that underpins global climate politics. International actors impose externally defined priorities and frameworks that fail to incorporate the needs, knowledge systems and rights of local populations. For example, the 30 by 30 conservation goal is rooted in the “Half-Earth” concept proposed by U.S. biologist E.O. Wilson, which advocates for protecting half of the planet from the destructive influence of humans. This vision universalizes a specific notion of “humanity” that denies our capacity to coexist with nonhuman life, as Indigenous groups have done for millennia.
Across Latin America and much of the Global South, environmental struggles usually do not artificially separate the protection of nature from the defense of livelihoods, autonomy and the social reproduction of communities. This more holistic vision sees these elements as intrinsically intertwined. “Nature conservation” as an independent concern, represented by U.S. conservation organizations, often treats nature as “wild and untouched” — something detached from our everyday lives. It emerged in contexts in which livelihoods are not existentially threatened by climate change, extractivism and displacement. The feminist theorist Nancy Fraser calls this approach an “environmentalism of the rich,” based on the idea that it is possible to protect nature without questioning the structural dynamics of capitalist society.
Debt-for-nature swaps do not solve either the debt crisis or the climate crisis. While they may be useful in specific cases under a strong regulatory framework, they should not be considered a viable solution to the funding gap for climate action and biodiversity conservation. The case of the Galápagos Islands makes clear that real climate justice cannot be separated from the social needs of local communities and requires going beyond market-based instruments. To effectively address the climate crisis and biodiversity loss, we must confront the global economic structures and colonial legacies that fuel both environmental degradation and social inequality, and reimagine conservation as a radical transformation of social and economic relations.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/greenwashing-debt-in-the-galapagos-islands/">Greenwashing Debt in the Galápagos Islands</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/greenwashing-debt-in-the-galapagos-islands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311427</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22015830693636-scaled.jpg?width=929&height=585" length="415647" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP22015830693636-scaled.jpg?width=929&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>The Life and Legacy of Charlie 4Chan</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-life-and-legacy-of-charlie-4chan/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-life-and-legacy-of-charlie-4chan</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-life-and-legacy-of-charlie-4chan/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeb Lund]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 19:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Belief & Religion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Social Justice]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[TD Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[TD Original]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[4chan]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[assassination]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[charlie kirk]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Turning Point USA]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311406</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Public officials who went silent after Democratic lawmakers were executed in their homes are tripping over themselves to honor the man who franchised internet chan culture as politics.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-life-and-legacy-of-charlie-4chan/">The Life and Legacy of Charlie 4Chan</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
We don’t know yet how far away the shooter was, what kind of gun or ammunition they used, what radicalized them and what made them choose their target. But, coincidence or not, they had a dramatic sense of timing. The last thing Charlie Kirk ever said before a bullet fatally struck his neck Wednesday afternoon was a racist dog whistle in the middle of smearing transgender Americans about gun violence.
If there is any silver lining for his legacy and organization, Turning Point USA, it’s that Charlie’s job was to mint lots more Charlie Kirks, so service should only be interrupted for a few days. Given that his gig required stoking eliminationist violence toward the right’s enemies, and that his colleagues have spent the last day retributively threatening the same, it’s like he never left us.
Some might tell you that the right has spent the last decade championing unrestricted free speech to smuggle back into the discourse the sorts of naked racism, homophobia and misogyny that academia has repeatedly invalidated and polite society did its best to anathematize. But let us adopt the sincerity they profess and heed their fondness for an apocryphal Voltaire quote — “I may not agree with what you say, sir, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” — by moving on to a real quip from that gentlemen — “To the living, we owe respect; to the dead, we owe only the truth” — and tell the truth about Charlie Kirk. That doing so has already led MSNBC to fire Matthew Dowd and the <a href="https://www.npr.org/2023/10/06/1203271345/florida-politics-peter-schorsch-southeast" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">pay-for-play</a> Florida Politics blog to <a href="https://x.com/PeterSchorschFL/status/1965873789021073734" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">turf a reporter for asking a smart question</a> should not dissuade us. Nor should the rat king of right-wing influencers demanding the heads of anyone even faintly describing him, or, evidently, the EU Parliament for failing to honor him.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Charlie’s job was to mint lots more Charlie Kirks.</blockquote></figure>
Like most good right-wing origin stories, Charlie’s began in resentment and ended in affirmative action for white people. He allegedly wasn’t accepted to West Point, not for lack of qualifications, but because “<a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/a-conservative-nonprofit-that-seeks-to-transform-college-campuses-faces-allegations-of-racial-bias-and-illegal-campaign-activity" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">a far less-qualified candidate of a different gender and a different persuasion</a>” was given his slot by a woke admissions process. (Please join me in calling on the president of the United States to call on the president of Harvard — because that’s how we do these things — to demand that Charlie Kirk’s high school release his transcripts.) Stuck for what to do next, like get a job in the private sector, he instead saw the success of <a href="http://moveon.org/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">MoveOn.org</a> and found a dad to give him money to copy it. Thus did Kirk found Turning Point USA, a nonprofit dedicated to seeding conservatism in American high schools and colleges.
Success did not come overnight. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0wzZhgbYWc" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Charlie’s first video for TPUSA</a> features him talking to Neil Cavuto about the generational theft of Barack Obama’s budgets, professing his nonpartisan objections to an oncoming fiscal cliff and $16 trillion in national debt. (As you can imagine, <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> did not receive nonpartisan criticism from TPUSA for adding $8 trillion to the national debt in his first term and a <a href="https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/us-debt-tops-37-trillion-big-beautiful-bill-allows-rise-trillions-higher" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">projected $4 trillion so far in the second</a> or for raising the debt ceiling by another $5 trillion.) Unfortunately, the young ideas wing of the tea party flatlined for much the same reasons as the real thing, failing to translate effectively outside of an extremely gerrymandered atmosphere and the structurally minoritarian features of Congress. The economic and political incoherence and hypocrisy never hit the big time until stripped of polite obfuscations about negative liberty in our fiscal household.
TPUSA took off when it decided to ride in Trump’s wake, when the theory of government became that anything we want it to do is our unalienable right, and anything the opposition does is unconstitutional. We no longer needed an interposing libertarian rationale to make doing things for, or preventing bad things from happening to, minorities or the poor not only unnecessary but illegal. Naturally, the new product needed a new kind of salesman, comfortable stating as a matter of course and without shame that things sure go to shit when a Black person is put in charge, when these fucking Mexicans move in next door, when I have to see a queer person existing unterrified in public, when a woman tells me what to do when I am not certain she’s just repeating something her husband told her.
What TPUSA learned on the ground was something that columnist <a href="https://www.splinter.com/charlottesville-was-a-preview-of-the-future-of-the-repu-1797988745" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Alex Pareene spotted all the way from New York City in 2017</a>: that, having adopted an ideology that had literally nothing to offer any young person except racism, Young Republicans clubs in high schools and colleges were recruiting fewer and fewer kids who weren’t racists. Demography met destiny when it was paired with both Kirk’s facility for youth-oriented but otherwise standard conservative memes — mean as hell and dumber’n a pile of pig shit — and a promotional structure up to a nationwide conservative machine that would reward loud amoral trolls.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Charlie franchised internet chan culture as politics, and the results speak for themselves.</blockquote></figure>
Combined with some tactically astute modesty and the <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/is-the-free-press-worth-a-quarter-billion-dollars/">Bari Weiss-like</a> capacity for <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/10/magazine/charlie-kirk-american-right.html" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">convincing wealthy people to give money because he’s the conservative child they never had</a>, Charlie franchised internet chan culture as politics, and the results speak for themselves. The chapters <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/a-conservative-nonprofit-that-seeks-to-transform-college-campuses-faces-allegations-of-racial-bias-and-illegal-campaign-activity" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">helmed by unvarnished racists</a>. <a href="https://gizmodo.com/tweets-about-diapers-broke-the-entire-conservative-yout-1823345007" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Diaper-based internecine strife</a>. Or the fact that an organization that gained national attention outside the right-wing ecosystem for trolling college campuses about free speech built an apparatus for McCarthyite reporting on professors who teach woke wrongthink. (Or that one of the fastest ways for Charlie to block mainstream journalists’ accounts was for them to correct him in the replies where his followers could see.) It was an online and real-life troll exercise without accountability or facts, built on the most exhausted whack-ass racist beliefs and raining anger comically or cathartically on whichever of the day’s persons of interest had gained traction — just some of the most comfortable malignancies in the world brigading individuals out of the blue, day after day, between <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/which-way-western-wuss/">ritualistically pausing to cry victim</a>.
Name an oppressed group or protected class, and Charlie said something that sounded like the reason those adjectives were there in the first place. Name an actual victim, and chances are you’ve also found the person he’d blame for their condition one or two tweets away from a pharisaical display of his faith. He would have you believe he was afraid of Black airline pilots and lesbians doing surgery on him because diversity, equity and inclusion promotes unqualified people into positions of lethal incompetence. He took a page from Lew Rockwell’s old racist Ron Paul newsletters and vilified Martin Luther King Jr. and civil rights legislation. He called for Nuremberg trials for doctors performing gender-affirming care. He promoted the deeply antisemitic Great Replacement theory, beloved of mass shooters and Elise Stefanik. He spoke at the Stop the Steal rally and later invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege about Jan. 6. He called for the military occupation of a <a href="https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/charlie-kirk-trump-military-occupation-b2805750.html" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">laundry list of blue cities</a>.
He was a bold tribune of dynamic ideas like Black history month is too long, and affirmative action is part of <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/democratic-party/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="12" title="democratic party" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the Democrats</a>’ war on white people. Democrats are going to trans your children. One day you’ll leave your house, and when you come back Democrats will have already moved in a family of pet-eating immigrants. Democrats are fundamentally weak. Democrats are strong enough to destroy America. Democrats already are destroying America. We have to do anything to stop them. Democracy’s overrated anyway. His <a href="https://x.com/charliekirk11" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">X account</a> will live forever; anytime you want, you can scroll it and see how many tweets it takes before you get to one where the outrage and its subject stop being a coincidence.
Today, Democratic public officials who had nothing to say about Democratic lawmakers being executed in their homes by a right-wing lunatic just a few months ago are tripping all over themselves to honor the career of a replacement-level fascist who achieved being on TV for a sustained period. Establishment dweeb Ezra Klein abundantly showed his whole ass in a New York Times column headlined, “Charlie Kirk Was Practicing Politics the Right Way.” To quote former journalist <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/ianboudreau.com" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Ian Boudreau</a>, who if anything is being too generous: “Would it have been possible to quote Kirk at length on any subject and run that headline? I don’t think so.”
As expected, the default message of yesterday and today has been, “Political violence is unacceptable.” Agreed. However, the rest of that message keeps getting cut off. The remainder reads: Militarily occupying American cities to quell a crime wave that isn’t happening is political violence. Attempting a coup that features “hang the vice president” on its to-do list is political violence. Pardoning nearly a thousand offenders who committed that political violence as a reward for it and to intimidate your opposition is political violence. “Swatting” your political opponents is political violence. Bomb threats for doctors, abortion clinics and facilities performing gender-affirming care is political violence. The Supreme Court eliminating the Fourth Amendment for Latinos is political violence. Black-bagging people — lawful American residents or no — and shipping them to torture prisons in countries they aren’t even from is political violence. There will be no unanimity of message today on any of those; for most, we will be fortunate if it earns 50%  uptake.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“Political violence is unacceptable.” Agreed. However, the rest of that message keeps getting cut off.</blockquote></figure>
The void left by those above messages going unrepeated will be filled with shaming. Those glad he’s gone will be shamed for giving conservatives a pretext for retributive political violence. But whatever sentences they utter about the need to extirpate all Democrats from the nation will differ from last week’s only in terms of which proper name they insert as a predicate this time. Critics will be shamed too, because Charlie Kirk was a family man, leaving behind a wife and children. He lost his life while doing his best to save his country from what he saw as the lethal march of communism. The 6th Army widows probably said the same thing about Stalingrad.
Between Stephen Miller retasking the federal law enforcement and military apparatus toward ethnic cleansing and Kash Patel remaking the FBI as an elite squad of coked-up podcasters, Charlie Kirk’s killer is much less likely to be brought to justice. That doesn’t have to be a bad thing for conservatives. When you find the killer, you wave the bloody shirt at the killer; when you don’t find him at all, you can wave it at anyone you want, which is why the right hasn’t waited for a single suspect and has already implicated Democrats so broadly as to put 80 million people on the wanted list.
A cynic might argue that turning Charlie Kirk into the new proper name you tack onto your “and another thing …” rant without even breaking stride in your vengeance march toward “The Left” is the most disrespectful thing of all. The march isn’t going any faster or slower, and it isn’t changing direction. Charlie Kirk might have been a father and a husband, but to his avengers, he won’t even be much of a speed bump.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-life-and-legacy-of-charlie-4chan/">The Life and Legacy of Charlie 4Chan</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-life-and-legacy-of-charlie-4chan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311406</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/charliekirk4chan.png?width=878&height=585" length="2129511" type="image/png" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/charliekirk4chan.png?width=878&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Death of a Troll</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/death-of-a-troll/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=death-of-a-troll</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/death-of-a-troll/#comments</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph L. Flatley]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 16:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Belief & Religion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[LGBTQIA+]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Social Justice]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[TD Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[TD Original]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[assassination]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[charlie kirk]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[great replacement theory]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[political violence]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[talking points USA]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311365</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Charlie Kirk, 1993—2025.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/death-of-a-troll/">Death of a Troll</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
It was possibly the lamest iteration of the music festival: Lollapalooza for people who think arguing with Charlie Kirk is a good way to spend an unseasonably warm fall afternoon. The American Comeback Tour was a series of campus events hosted by Kirk’s organization, Turning Point USA, where students were invited to debate him on a variety of political and cultural issues, primarily for the purpose of creating viral content for his social media operation. As much as people like to call Charlie Kirk a “conservative activist,” he is better described as an influencer and a troll, a human 4chan in a tight suit.
Clips are now circulating of Kirk declaring that gun deaths are “worth it” compared to the alternative of a slightly pared back Second Amendment. “You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won’t have a single gun death,” <a href="https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/charlie-kirk-gun-deaths-quote/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">he told</a> a crowd of the faithful in 2023. “I think it’s worth it. I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year.”
Yesterday, while Kirk held court in a tent on the campus of Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, <a href="https://www.opb.org/article/2025/09/10/charlie-kirk-shot/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">an audience member asked</a>: “Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?”
“Too many,” Kirk replied.
“Five” was the correct answer. The next question: “Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years?” 
“Counting or not counting gang violence?” Kirk asked. 
These were his last words. 
Charlie Kirk died as he lived — making very little sense.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year.”</blockquote></figure>
Kirk was 18 years old when he cofounded TPUSA in 2012 after deciding that his high school teachers <a href="https://politicalresearch.org/2022/01/28/ten-years-turning-point-usa" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">were all rabid Marxists</a>. By 2016, the group had raised $4.3 million; by 2020,<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/oct/23/turning-point-rightwing-youth-group-critics-tactics" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank"> $39.8 million</a>. The business model was elegant in its cynicism: Set up a table on campus. Put up a sign: “Men Cannot Get Pregnant” or “Build the Wall,” something calculated to draw a crowd. Wait for someone to get angry. Film them getting angry. Post the video: WOKE MOB ATTACKS CONSERVATIVE STUDENT. Then watch the donations roll in. Buy more tables, find more people to sit at them. Repeat. The exercise wasn’t about building bridges or winning converts, but whipping up hostility for <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/a-conservative-nonprofit-that-seeks-to-transform-college-campuses-faces-allegations-of-racial-bias-and-illegal-campaign-activity" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">tax-exempt donations</a>.
Kirk understood something about the attention economy that the traditional conservatives missed: moderation is expensive. It requires explanation, nuance, the kind of careful thinking that makes terrible video content. But <a href="https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/this-must-stop-tpusas-charlie-kirk" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">advocating violence against trans people</a> — that goes viral. It encourages the worst of us to break out our checkbooks.
TPUSA was largely bankrolled by stunts calculated to inject chaos into the system, increasing the possibility of violence. Its <a href="https://www.splcenter.org/resources/reports/turning-point-usa-case-study-hard-right-2024/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">School Board Watchlist</a> published names, affiliations and crimes against conservative thought, <a href="https://www.aaup.org/issues-higher-education/political-attacks-higher-ed/targeted-harassment-faculty/what-turning-point" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">leading to death threats</a>, which Charlie dismissed as the cost of doing business. “We’re at war,” he often said.
There had been violence, of course. At the <a href="https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/controversial-student-led-event-goes-planned" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">University of California, Davis in March 2023, windows were smashed, an officer was injured and two people were arressted</a>. The protesters tried to shut Kirk down, Kirk’s cameras catching every broken pane. <a href="https://portal.csun.edu/persona_selector_2024/news/detail?feed=daily-sundial-rss&id=7cf2c356-20fc-525b-92f4-c2c0ddbbc208" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">At California State University, Northridge in the same year, a crowd swarmed Kirk’s tent</a>, someone threw punches, a deaf student tried to ask a question and Kirk accused the sign language interpreter of “being a jerk.” It was all great content. And all of it confirmed the narrative: We are under attack.
The Great Replacement theory made regular appearances at Kirk’s events. “We native-born Americans are being replaced by foreigners,” Kirk said while stumping for <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a>, warning about “the enemy occupation of the foreigner hordes.” This is the same white nationalist conspiracy theory that has appeared in countless manifestos. But Kirk was too smart to write one; manifestos were for losers who shot up Walmarts. Kirk was building something more durable: an infrastructure of rage that would outlast any single act of violence.
Jan. 6 should have been the end of it. (It should have been the end of a lot of things.) Turning Point Action — the organization’s political arm — boasted of sending “<a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/jan-6-organizer-ali-alexander-blames-turning-point-usa-for-capitol-riot/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">80-plus buses full of patriots</a>” to Washington. At least, that’s what Kirk tweeted before deleting it, before the windows of the Capitol started breaking. But it wasn’t the end. Nothing ever is anymore. The donations kept coming. The tours continued. The machine ground on.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Charlie Kirk died as he lived — making very little sense.</blockquote></figure>
I heard the news about Charlie Kirk on TMZ. Harvey Levin looked absolutely shocked — like he was having a panic attack on the livestream. Meanwhile, some conservative Gen Z member of the newsroom kept repeating TPUSA talking points about civilians having the right to possess assault rifles. It was chaos. They kept cutting the sound, then it would come back on 10 seconds later. Levin recalled witnessing RFK’s assassination in Los Angeles in 1968, and how he thought America could never get worse than that night.
My thoughts upon hearing the news turned to a different assassination, that of George Lincoln Rockwell, the American Nazi Party founder who was shot by a fellow racist at a laundromat in Arlington, Virginia, in 1967. The bullet caught him in the chest while he was holding laundry detergent and a copy of the New York Daily News. The party had expelled the assassin, John Patler, for his Greek heritage. But while he may not have been Nordic enough for the ANP purists, Patler possessed other key requisites.
Like Kirk, Rockwell had devoted his life to hate speech, until hate fired a gun in his direction.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/death-of-a-troll/">Death of a Troll</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/death-of-a-troll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311365</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/CharlieKirkDeath.png?width=878&height=585" length="1174921" type="image/png" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/CharlieKirkDeath.png?width=878&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>The Roots of Trump’s Wars on Terror Trace Back to 9/11</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-roots-of-trumps-wars-on-terror-trace-back-to-9-11/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-roots-of-trumps-wars-on-terror-trace-back-to-9-11</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-roots-of-trumps-wars-on-terror-trace-back-to-9-11/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Beavers / Responsible Statecraft ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Americas]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[patriot act]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[september 11]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[venezuela]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[war on terror]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311355</guid>
<description><![CDATA[After the attacks on New York and Washington, the US built a legal framework for permanent conflict that all presidents since have systematically abused.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-roots-of-trumps-wars-on-terror-trace-back-to-9-11/">The Roots of Trump’s Wars on Terror Trace Back to 9/11</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
The U.S. military recently launched a plainly illegal strike on a small civilian Venezuelan boat that President <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> claims was a successful hit on “<a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115136798909755892" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">narcoterrorists</a>.” Vice President <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/jd-vance/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="9" title="JD Vance" target="_blank" rel="noopener">JD Vance</a> responded to allegations that the strike was a war crime <a href="https://x.com/JDVance/status/1964341436096057502" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">by saying,</a> “I don’t give a shit what you call it,” <a href="https://x.com/JDVance/status/1964341094226743787" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">insisting</a> this was the “highest and best use of the military.”
This is only the latest troubling development in the Trump administration’s attempt to repurpose “War on Terror” mechanisms to use the military against cartels and to expedite his much-vaunted mass deportation campaign, which he says is necessary because of an <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/protecting-the-american-people-against-invasion/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">“invasion”</a> at the border.
Unfortunately, more than two decades of widely accepted, bipartisan laws and norms laid the groundwork for this to occur.
After 9/11, the Bush administration created the Specially Designated Global Terrorists list, and Congress expanded the preexisting Foreign Terrorist Organization list. These lists allow the executive branch, at its sole discretion, to add and remove individuals and groups to standing lists of “terrorists,” a term that is defined broadly.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>More than two decades of widely accepted, bipartisan laws and norms laid the groundwork for this to occur.</blockquote></figure>
The Trump administration has exercised this authority to formally <a href="https://www.state.gov/designation-of-international-cartels/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">designate</a> transnational cartels as terrorists due in part to their role in the flow of people and drugs across the southern border into the United States. They have leveraged this designation to justify a range of actions, including <a href="https://x.com/PeteHegseth/status/1931533276985823392?t=NsDuw1gelGEM9Cxe2r299A&s=19" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">deploying</a> troops to Los Angeles and <a href="https://x.com/StephenM/status/1908944082342129665" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">deporting</a> immigrants to a brutal Salvadoran prison without due process.
Another post-9/11 legal invention that paved the way to what the Trump administration is doing today was the USA Patriot Act’s updates to immigration law that <a href="https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1963&context=facpub" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">allowed</a> deportation of not just those involved in actual violent acts of terrorism, but also those loosely associated with designated “terrorist groups,” even if those associations were peaceful and law-abiding or involuntary and a result of duress. People who have previously been excluded from the United States by these provisions include <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/national/2008/03/23/stalwart-service-for-us-in-iraq-is-not-enough-to-gain-green-card/80683dcc-45b5-4dab-8925-d6f3b06561de/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Iraqi interpreters</a> for U.S. troops, <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/a-victim-of-terrorism-faces-deportation-for-helping-terrorists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">victims</a> of forced labor by violent armed groups in El Salvador, and even <a href="https://time.com/5338569/nelson-mandela-terror-list/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Nelson Mandela</a>. These provisions mean that not just alleged members of cartels, but also cartel victims could be denied entry into the United States or deported if already here.
These same post-9/11 immigration law amendments also allow for revoking or denying immigration benefits to foreign nationals who “endorse or espouse” “terrorist activity,” defined broadly. The Trump administration has already revoked the visas of several immigrant students and scholars <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.282460/gov.uscourts.mad.282460.73.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">solely</a> for their nonviolent activities criticizing the U.S.-Israel genocide in Gaza, as part of what they call a “<a href="https://x.com/SecRubio/status/1897776709778211044" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">zero-tolerance</a>” policy for terrorism. The administration has primarily leaned on an older and more obscure provision of immigration law to carry out these attacks on immigrants’ free speech rights. But if current efforts are blocked by courts, or they wish to go further, post-9/11 immigration law may give them the tools to justify doing so.
The original decision to treat the 9/11 attacks not as crime but as warfare, and to launch a literal war on terror in response, remains the primary post-9/11 legal innovation on which so many abuses are made possible. Under this global war paradigm, the Obama administration carried out ruthless drone killings, including one that targeted a <a href="https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/pages/attachments/2015/04/02/2010-07-16_-_olc_aaga_barron_-_al-aulaqi.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">U.S. citizen</a>, and justified the strikes with a mishmash of <a href="https://www.aclu.org/news/national-security/details-abound-drone-playbook-except-ones-really-matter-most" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">legal standards</a> that applied rules of war outside of actual war zones, and expansively interpreted what constitutes an “imminent threat” and resulting “self-defense” powers.
Every post-9/11 president has claimed wide authority to use military force so long as it serves a vague “<a href="https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/olcs-meaningless-national-interests-test-legality-presidential-uses-force" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">national interest</a>.” We can see echoes of this in the Trump administration’s insistence that the small Venezuelan boat blown up by the U.S. military posed an “<a href="https://archive.ph/HoNBt" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">immediate threat</a> to the United States,” that the strike <a href="https://archive.ph/HoNBt" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">complied</a> with the laws of war, and was “in defense of vital U.S. national interests.”
<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/04/us/politics/trump-drug-smugglers-military.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Commentators</a> are entirely correct to denounce these assertions of legal authority. But policymakers have spent more than two decades accepting a war paradigm against whomever presidents determine to be “terrorists,” making it politically and legally all the more difficult to push back against what the Trump administration is doing now.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Every post-9/11 president has claimed wide authority to use military force so long as it serves a vague “national interest.”</blockquote></figure>
It is also worth recalling that dragnet detentions and deportations of immigrants under the auspices of the war on terror are not entirely unique to the Trump era. In the George W. Bush administration, then-FBI Director Robert Mueller leaned on civil immigration enforcement authorities to round up more than 1,000 Arab, Muslim and South Asian immigrants without due process for <a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/special/0306/full.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">secret detention</a> until they were “cleared” of having terrorist ties.
A year later, the National Security Entry and Exit Registration System, which some have called the original “<a href="https://www.sacbee.com/news/article119755693.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Muslim registry</a>,” was launched, imposing onerous registration and surveillance requirements on lawful noncitizen immigrants suspected of no wrongdoing, almost entirely from Muslim-majority countries, with a stated justification of countering terrorism. This program wasn’t fully dismantled until well into the Obama administration, and produced no convictions for acts of terrorism. It did result in the deportation of more than 13,000 people, mostly over minor immigration process violations.
There are more powers that post-9/11 legal infrastructure affords that this administration has not pursued. It is not impossible to imagine terrorism prosecutions against low-level drug purchasers at home, new hot wars across Latin America and more dragnet deportations of immigrants, justified by a melding of the laws of war, counterterrorism and immigration enforcement. This is because, on a bipartisan basis, our lawmakers have built and strengthened a post-9/11 package of powers that gets handed to each successive president, ripe for potential new weaponization and abuse. The targeting of immigrants and cartels as “terrorists,” including with the tools of warfare, is not a sharp deviation from our recent history — it is its logical conclusion.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-roots-of-trumps-wars-on-terror-trace-back-to-9-11/">The Roots of Trump’s Wars on Terror Trace Back to 9/11</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-roots-of-trumps-wars-on-terror-trace-back-to-9-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311355</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25254484126147-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" length="331622" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25254484126147-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Letter From Sicily: A Migrant-Rescue Ship Charts a Course for Gaza</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/letter-from-sicily-a-migrant-rescue-ship-charts-a-course-for-gaza/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=letter-from-sicily-a-migrant-rescue-ship-charts-a-course-for-gaza</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/letter-from-sicily-a-migrant-rescue-ship-charts-a-course-for-gaza/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefania D'Ignoti]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Social Justice]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[TD Original]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[gaza]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Global Sumud Flotilla]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[humanitarian crisis]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[NGO Emergency]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[sicily]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311349</guid>
<description><![CDATA[An NGO that usually saves drowning migrants in the Mediterranean has joined the latest besieged Gaza aid flotilla.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/letter-from-sicily-a-migrant-rescue-ship-charts-a-course-for-gaza/">Letter From Sicily: A Migrant-Rescue Ship Charts a Course for Gaza</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
SICILY—On the afternoon of Aug. 29, a little more than one day into its 36th mission in the Mediterranean, the search-and-rescue (SAR) vessel Life Support made an unexpected midsea U-turn back to Sicily. The boat, owned by the humanitarian nongovernmental organization Emergency, had already begun rerouting when head of mission Jonathan Nanì La Torre summoned crew members for a meeting. Standing in a room filled with old books and maritime knots, he informed the crew that they were being recalled to join the Global Sumud Flotilla expedition to Gaza, the latest attempt to break the siege Israel has imposed on the Gaza Strip and open a symbolic humanitarian aid corridor.
The sudden decision from the Italian NGO’s Milan headquarters came “like thunder from a clear sky,” said Nanì La Torre, an SAR rescuer and former head of mission. “I had goose bumps. It’ll forever be a historic moment for our crew.”
Nanì La Torre and his colleagues understand their new assignment as an extension of their work in the Mediterranean, where their boat is one of the two dozen vessels navigating search-and-rescue zones to save migrants left stranded at sea while attempting to reach Europe from North Africa. According to official data by the U.N.’s International Organization for Migration, more than 25,000 people have lost their lives over the past 10 years in what is considered the world’s most dangerous migrant route.
“Just as in Gaza, political inaction leaves a gap to be filled by civilians at sea,” said Maria Elena Delia, Italian spokesperson of the Global Sumud Flotilla, during a press conference.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“Just as in Gaza, political inaction leaves a gap to be filled by civilians at sea.”</blockquote></figure>
“From aiding migrants at sea to aiding besieged Gazawis, the struggle for liberation in the Mediterranean is one, so our presence is not out of context in this mission,” said Nanì La Torre. “We have been witnessing a progressive political closure of the sea that should be a safe passage, as right-wing governments in Europe have created a humanitarian gap that aid workers and civilians must fill. This mission is about filling that gap of basic human rights.”
Since August of 2024, Emergency has been on the ground in Gaza providing medical assistance to victims of Israeli attacks, and its staff is well aware of the atrocities taking place on the ground. A few days before their decision to join the Sumud, the house next to their office in Khan Younis was bombed, killing a family of six that they had come to care for as neighbors and friends over the past two years. They will be joined in the Sumud by four coalitions that also bring prior experience in land and sea efforts to break Gaza blockades: Global Movement to Gaza, Freedom Flotilla Coalition, Maghreb Sumud Flotilla and Sumud Nusantara.
“For us it was a natural decision to join this solidarity movement,” Anabel Montes Mier, head of Emergency’s mission with the flotilla, told Truthdig. “We cannot accept what is happening in Gaza, we have to do something concrete to stop the siege. Logistically, it will be a completely different mission than the ones we are used to. Thematically, we don’t see any difference.”
Earlier this year, the dots connecting Israel’s war on Gaza and the European Union’s crackdown on migration were highlighted when Israeli drones<a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/02/europe/gaza-flotilla-ship-sos-intl-hkn" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank"> deliberately targeted</a> one Freedom Flotilla vessel, then<a href="https://trt.global/world/article/505bb953ef9b" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank"> spied on another</a>, using technology that a<a href="https://newlinesmag.com/spotlight/the-israeli-drones-guarding-fortress-europe/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank"> recent investigation</a> found to be the same used by the EU’s border patrol agency Frontex to surveil and curb migration in the Mediterranean. The overlap represents “an amalgamation of years of brutal repression aimed at migrants and refugees trying to cross the water and the repression of Palestinians,” the author reported.
Emergency’s participation reflects this amalgamation, the crew says. During the mission, their vessel will hold an observer role, stopping 150 nautical miles from Gaza’s coast. They will be the last ones to depart from Sicily and join the rest departing from Tunis. Their boat will bring up the rear of the group, together with the legal vessel, named in honor of the late Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, to offer logistical and witnessing support in the event of any incidents. After two Israeli warplanes were spotted at the nearby American base of Sigonella, security concerns changed the initial plan of all the boats departing together on Sept. 4 from the port of Catania in Sicily, where the Life Support is currently docked.
The boats that left Barcelona on Sept. 1 and diverted their route to Tunis, however, ended up being attacked twice, on the night of Sept. 8 and again on Sept. 9, when Israeli drones struck the Family Boat, the flotilla’s head vessel, and another vessel within Tunisian territorial waters.
The event took place after Israel’s Ministry of Security threatened to treat flotilla activists as terrorists and confiscate their boats and repurpose them for Israel Defense Forces use. Since 2018, Italy’s far-right government has also threatened and criminalized the work of humanitarian workers on multiple occasions.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>“For us it was a natural decision to join this solidarity movement.”</blockquote></figure>
In January 2023, three months after the far-right government of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni came to power, Italy issued a decree ordering the impoundment of humanitarian boats that refused to abide by the Ministry of Interior’s choice of ports of safety. In the past, those ports were usually assigned based on geographical proximity; now it is based on the government’s determination of “availability,” which Davide Giacomini, Emergency’s advocacy officer, claims puts the boats in the furthest ports from operational areas. “This means extra days of navigation, further sufferings for the saved castaways and a lesser presence of SAR vessels in rescue areas,” he added.
This past August, a rescue ship named the Mediterranea was impounded and fined more than 10,000 euros after having refused Rome’s order to disembark in Genoa, adding an extra four days of navigation compared to the nearest port in Sicily, which the NGO used against government orders.
Emergency’s crew is conscious of the risks ahead but determined to contribute to the expedition. The day before his Sept. 10 departure from Catania’s port, where a military vessel from NATO’s Operation Sea Guardian had been docked menacingly next to the Life Support, Nanì La Torre had a spark in his eye. “I don’t know what to expect, but I feel ready,” he said. “I’m just grateful to have the opportunity to join the biggest civilian effort to break the siege on a starving and martyred population.”
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/letter-from-sicily-a-migrant-rescue-ship-charts-a-course-for-gaza/">Letter From Sicily: A Migrant-Rescue Ship Charts a Course for Gaza</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/letter-from-sicily-a-migrant-rescue-ship-charts-a-course-for-gaza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311349</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25252530899493-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" length="528753" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25252530899493-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>CBS Drifts Further Toward Right-Wing State Television</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/cbs-drifts-further-toward-right-wing-state-television/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=cbs-drifts-further-toward-right-wing-state-television</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/cbs-drifts-further-toward-right-wing-state-television/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saurav Sarkar / FAIR ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[bari weiss]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[cbs news]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[kristi noem]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311322</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In an effort to appease the White House, the network will no longer edit interviews with administration officials on Face the Nation.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/cbs-drifts-further-toward-right-wing-state-television/">CBS Drifts Further Toward Right-Wing State Television</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
After President <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a>’s Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem <a href="https://x.com/Sec_Noem/status/1962256536475926676?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1962256536475926676%7Ctwgr%5E2a66a539bd9fa5885e797cdeb790570bb3e26238%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fmedia%2Fshamefully-edited-noem-posts-her-own-version-of-kilmar-abrego-garcia-answer-from-face-the-nation-interview%2F" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">complained on X</a> that several minutes of her Aug. 31 “Face the Nation” <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/video/full-interview-homeland-security-secretary-kristi-noem/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">interview</a> had been “shamefully edited … to whitewash the truth,” CBS News announced that its flagship Sunday morning program will <a href="https://apnews.com/article/cbs-face-nation-editing-kristi-noem-0a148a59c50ee50921b029528946244e" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">no longer edit</a> its interviews, except for “legal or national security” reasons.
According to the Associated Press, CBS said it had edited the interview, which ran 16 minutes and 40 seconds in its original form, for length, and posted the full interview on its website and YouTube. As the AP correctly noted, Noem “made a series of <a href="https://fair.org/home/top-papers-dutifully-echo-cooked-up-charges-against-abrego-garcia/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">unproven accusations</a> about Ábrego García” in the portion of the interview that was cut. This is a <a href="https://fair.org/home/top-papers-dutifully-echo-cooked-up-charges-against-abrego-garcia/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">pattern</a> of <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2025/09/08/kilmar-abrego-garcia-ms-13-documents-gang/85891593007/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">behavior </a>by the administration with respect to Kilmar Ábrego García, a Salvadoran refugee who had been illegally deported to the CECOT <a href="https://www.damemagazine.com/2025/05/08/its-not-hyperbole-to-call-cecot-a-concentration-camp/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">concentration camp</a> in his country of origin.
In the context of the recent capitulations by CBS News and its parent company Paramount in the face of Trump administration demands, the announcement is noteworthy — and dangerous.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Uneditable propaganda</h3>
Writing for FAIR, Ari Paul <a href="https://fair.org/home/paramount-sells-out-journalism-to-secure-purchase-by-skydance/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">noted in July</a> that, in order to facilitate a merger with Skydance, 
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
Paramount has settled what is widely regarded as a frivolous lawsuit from Trump for $16 million over a CBS “60 Minutes” interview with <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/kamala-harris/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="3" title="Kamala Harris" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kamala Harris</a>; it has also canceled its highly successful and long-running “Late Show With Stephen Colbert,” whose host was critical of the settlement.
</blockquote>
Variety <a href="https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/cbs-news-face-the-nation-interviews-no-edits-backlash-1236509301/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">argued that</a> CBS‘ promise not to edit “Face the Nation‘s” interviews, which overwhelmingly feature government officials,
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
is an unorthodox one, potentially leaving show moderators and producers unable to remove false statements or propaganda uttered by political operatives and officials and undermining the authority and credibility of Margaret Brennan, the moderator of the Sunday public affairs program.
</blockquote>
An anonymous CBS source weakly protested to the AP that “Face the Nation‘s” Brennan would “still be able to factcheck or challenge claims made by interview subjects.” But corporate media outlets have <a href="https://fair.org/take-action/action-alerts/cbs-skips-bachmann-factcheck/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">never been good</a> at <a href="https://fair.org/home/cnns-debate-plan-makes-democracy-the-likely-loser/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">stopping political figures</a> from <a href="https://fair.org/home/to-cozy-up-to-trump-bezos-banishes-dissent-from-wapo/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">spewing</a> <a href="https://fair.org/home/media-sidelined-deadly-consequences-of-trumps-reconciliation-bill/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">propaganda</a>, particularly those from Trump and his minions, who produce falsehoods at such a rapid clip that it’s impossible to challenge each one. Now CBS will have even fewer tools to do so.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Installing a commissar</h3>
In yet another move to the right, days after its editing announcement, CBS News<a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news-names-ombudsman-kenneth-r-weinstein/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank"> announced</a> that, to fulfill part of its settlement with Trump, it would be appointing <a href="https://www.poynter.org/commentary/2025/cbs-ombudsman-kenneth-weinstein-who/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Kenneth R. Weinstein</a> to serve as an ombudsman. In addition to being a prominent conservative — Weinstein previously headed the <a href="https://www.desmog.com/hudson-institute/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Hudson Institute</a> for over a decade — the new appointee was nominated by Trump to be U.S. ambassador to Japan in 2020 (though his nomination was <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/trumps-former-japan-ambassador-nominee-appointed-cbs-news-ombudsman-2025-09-08/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">never confirmed</a>). Weinstein “will review editorial questions and concerns from outside entities and employees,” CBS said.
While FAIR has <a href="https://fair.org/home/killing-the-public-editor-nyt-deals-another-blow-to-the-publics-trust/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">lamented</a> the gradual disappearance of ombuds from major journalistic outlets over the years, and the loss of accountability to their audiences that that entails, it’s critical that ombuds be independent. Weinstein’s clear ideological tilt, his connection to the Trump administration and his position’s creation at the command of that administration stand as obvious obstacles to him performing any role but state censor.
FAIR also <a href="https://fair.org/home/paramount-sells-out-journalism-to-secure-purchase-by-skydance/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">pointed out</a> that Paramount was looking to give right-wing journalist and <a href="https://theintercept.com/2018/03/08/the-nyts-bari-weiss-falsely-denies-her-years-of-attacks-on-the-academic-freedom-of-arab-scholars-who-criticize-israel/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">censorious</a> “free speech” activist <a href="https://fair.org/home/supposedly-taboo-ideas-that-actually-appear-frequently-in-the-pages-of-the-new-york-times/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">Bari Weiss</a> a top role at CBS News. It has since <a href="https://puck.news/david-ellison-set-to-acquire-the-free-press/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">been reported</a> that the company is looking to buy her publication, the Free Press, for as much as $200 million.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/cbs-drifts-further-toward-right-wing-state-television/">CBS Drifts Further Toward Right-Wing State Television</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/cbs-drifts-further-toward-right-wing-state-television/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311322</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25238723522783-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" length="499239" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25238723522783-scaled.jpg?width=878&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Colonize Then, Deport Now</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/colonize-then-deport-now/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=colonize-then-deport-now</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/colonize-then-deport-now/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Ort / Africa Is A Country ]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Courts & Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Decolonization]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[liberia]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[third country deportation]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311315</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Trump’s deportation regime revives a colonial blueprint first drafted by the American Colonization Society, when Black lives were exiled to Africa to safeguard a white republic.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/colonize-then-deport-now/">Colonize Then, Deport Now</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
Robert Goldsborough, a Maryland lawmaker, rose one Friday early in 1826 to clinch what he fancied a good deal for his state. Goldsborough informed his fellow legislators that a private entity had “incurred an expense in a late deportation of 150 free people of color to the African settlement in Liberia.” Given that “twenty of those free people of colour [sic] were from the state of Maryland,” he <a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=ien.35556011468543&seq=415&q1=deported" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">directed the state’s treasury</a> to reimburse the cost of their removal.
The recipient: the American Colonization Society (ACS). It was the ACS, composed of prominent white men, that founded Liberia as a colony where the U.S. could send its free Black populace. The self-styled colonization movement encompassed both abolitionists and enslavers. Many were ministers zealous to evangelize and “redeem” Africa. While the ACS disavowed any official position on slavery, its members insisted that free Black people had no place in their body politic.
Flash forward two centuries: <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/tag/donald-trump/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="4" title="Donald Trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> is using mass deportation to plunge the U.S. into a tin-pot fascist police state. Jamelle Bouie has <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/24/opinion/trump-deportation-immigration-border.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">likened</a> the horrors <a href="https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/07/ice-public-opinion-civil-war-trump-revolt.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">we now witness daily</a> — masked agents abducting Black and brown people from restaurants and courthouses, street corners and schools — to the <a href="https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/the-fugitive-slave-act-1850" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Fugitive Slave Act of 1850</a>. The comparison is right, but the roots of this catastrophic moment reach even further back. Mass deportation follows the anti-Black blueprint that white colonizationists had laid a generation before.
To be sure, Black immigrants, born both enslaved and free, came to Liberia seeking liberation. Many settlers embraced the proposition of returning to their ancestral homeland. Liberia’s motto remains “The Love of Liberty Brought Us Here.” But if Liberia promised escape from slavery and racism, the promise would be betrayed.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>Mass deportation follows the anti-Black blueprint that white colonizationists had laid a generation before.</blockquote></figure>
Though the ACS claimed no one would leave against their will, the choice was burdened. The ubiquity of American racism made emigration plausible in the first place. Some enslavers forced families to purchase their freedom <a href="https://exhibits.lafayette.edu/s/mcdonogh/page/voyage-to-liberia" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">on the condition that they sail for Africa</a>. Many Black abolitionists, <a href="https://frederickdouglasspapersproject.com/s/digitaledition/item/15967" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Frederick Douglass</a> foremost among them, denounced the ACS. Long before Kristi Noem would <a href="https://www.themarshallproject.org/2025/06/14/ice-immigration-dhs-deportation-facts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">dangle a poisoned offer of cash</a> to incentivize “self-deportation,” colonizationists manufactured the illusion of Black people’s consent.
The colonization movement enveloped Washington, counting legislators, judges and presidents among its ranks. Those power brokers advanced ACS interests from public office. Then-President James Monroe, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/07/us/politics/monroe-slavery-highland.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">an enslaver</a> and ardent colonizationist, became the namesake for Liberia’s capital, Monrovia, by <a href="https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/dwe/16337.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">securing funds</a> for the fledgling colony. Long before <a href="https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/2025/07/03/alligator-alcatraz-desantis-cdr-maguire-gardaworld-contractors/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">contractors would build</a> a concentration camp in the Everglades, the ACS used federal patronage for its eliminationist ends.
Goldsborough noted that of the 150 immigrants who had arrived in Liberia, 20 “were from the state of Maryland.” The remark admitted that the newest Liberians had spent their lives in his state. Goldsborough nevertheless urged their removal. Long before the White House would <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/kilmar-abrego-garcia-update-donald-trump-el-salvador-2094334" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">berate journalists</a> for recognizing that Kilmar Ábrego García is a “Maryland man,” the ACS avowed that only white settlers could call the U.S. their own.
The ACS seized a stretch of African coastline, making no effort to bring immigrants where their ancestors had been enslaved. After the trade of enslaved Africans was outlawed, American warships took to patrolling the Atlantic. Upon intercepting slave ships, the Navy “returned” the captives aboard to Liberia — though most had been shackled along the Congo Basin. The term “Congo” now signifies all those who came, no matter their birthplace, to Liberia. The settlers would, in turn, establish Liberia <a href="https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/122549/1/Development_Dual_Citizenship_and_Its_Discontents_in_Africa.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">as Africa’s first Black republic</a>, a paradox in that the new nation <a href="http://www.liberlii.org/lr/cases/LRSC/1919/2.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">colonized the land</a> and <a href="https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/colony-nation-liberian-independence-and-black-self-government-atlantic" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">oppressed its Indigenous peoples</a>.
Today’s White House is disappearing detainees to “third countries,” a euphemism for nations where they have never set foot — and often face grave danger. Most notorious is El Salvador, whose right-wing dictator Nayib Bukele boasts a hideous pact with Trump. But the pair’s homegrown gulags are only one thread in an unfolding global plot.
Most countries facing pressure to take American detainees are African. In June, <a href="https://apnews.com/article/trump-south-sudan-djibouti-deport-supreme-court-50f9162cff680b5c8729873e11d514e9" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">the U.S. Supreme Court authorized</a> the expulsion of eight detainees, who had endured months inside a shipping container in Djibouti, to <a href="https://humanrightsfirst.org/dvd-v-dhs/" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">South Sudan</a>. <a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2025/7/25/is-trump-using-africa-as-a-dumping-ground-for-criminals" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Flights to Eswatini</a> and <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/rwanda-received-migrants-deported-us-earlier-this-month-2025-08-28/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Rwanda</a> have followed. The White House is eyeing Liberia — alongside Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Libya, Mauritania, Nigeria, Senegal and Uganda — <a href="https://apnews.com/article/trump-migration-nigeria-deal-rwanda-south-sudan-1978d5923e8f110ec1c390a7a01723df" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">for similar designs</a>. (<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn02eezlykdo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Honduras</a> and <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/23/trump-administration-asks-tiny-pacific-nation-of-palau-to-accept-migrants-deported-from-us" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Palau</a> are also under duress.)
True to the <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-referred-haiti-african-countries-shithole-nations-n836946" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">infamous slur</a> that Trump uttered in his first term, one African nation deserves “<a href="https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-vowed-deport-worst-worst-new-data-shows/story?id=123287810" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">the worst of the worst</a>” as much as any other. While governments <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/30/south-sudan-might-take-more-us-migrant-deportees-it-has-a-few-asks-00482793" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">might ask favors</a> for holding detainees, the gutting of the U.S. Agency for International Development has deprived many, <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/world/africa/us-abruptly-ends-support-liberia-faces-empty-health-clinics-unplanned-rcna217407" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">particularly Liberia</a>, of leverage. What’s more, a <a href="https://www.cfr.org/article/guide-countries-trumps-2025-travel-ban-list" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank">travel ban</a> now targets much of Africa — Afrikaner “refugees” <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/21/africa/trump-resettling-south-africas-afrikaners-intl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">exempted</a>, of course. Little surprise that Trump was <a href="https://apnews.com/article/liberia-president-language-speaking-us-trump-4357549a81d24c6ee161091aaed9b66a" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">bewildered</a> when Liberian President Joseph Boakai recently addressed him in English. The White House, to quote Swazi activists, takes the continent for “<a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/17/africa/africa-eswatini-trump-us-deportees-intl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">a dumping ground</a>.”
The U.S. has no monopoly on perpetuating <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1287g49" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">the global color line</a>. Trump’s tactics resemble <a href="https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/trump-australia-inspired-cruel-immigration-crackdown-rcna220576" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Australia’s removal of migrants</a> to Papua New Guinea and Nauru. The United Kingdom <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/aug/09/foreign-criminals-tried-uk-deported-immediately-new-plans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">still champions</a> mass deportation, even after its misbegotten scheme to <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/explainers-61782866" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">deport asylum seekers</a> to Rwanda. That is to say nothing of Israel’s <a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/13/israel-south-sudan-in-talks-over-forced-transfer-of-palestinians-report" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">reported efforts</a> to remove those who survive its genocide in Gaza to South Sudan — a chilling echo of the Nazi “<a href="https://forward.com/opinion/696193/trump-gaza-proposal-madagascar-plan-nazis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Madagascar Plan</a>.”
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>The U.S. has no monopoly on perpetuating the global color line.</blockquote></figure>
Rarely, however, is it grasped stateside that mass deportation is neocolonial — much less that colonial implicates the U.S. two centuries ago. Goldsborough and his ilk deemed free Black people an intolerable problem. They saw in Africa their salvation — the means, Norfolk colonizationists had declared weeks before Goldsborough spoke, of “putting away the whole of <a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=ien.35556011468543&seq=377&q1=evil" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">this black and menacing evil</a>, gradually, safely, and most happily, from our land.”
The continent likewise seals the promise that returned Trump to power: deliver America from the migrant hordes that are “<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-says-immigrants-are-poisoning-blood-country-biden-campaign-liken-rcna130141" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">poisoning the blood of our country</a>.” <a href="https://apnews.com/article/immigration-border-security-venezuela-tps-noem-af43e2135ea588717669794288e5b6e6" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Venezuelan</a> or <a href="https://apnews.com/article/afghans-protected-status-trump-homeland-security-8ea0569a79700c32ddbcac3a4b616cb1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Afghan</a> or <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/28/tps-haiti-terminated-trump-00431124" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Haitian</a> or <a href="https://www.liberianobserver.com/news/don-t-risk-jail-or-deportation/article_6b66aebd-d255-406e-ac0d-973d962e34e4.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Liberian</a> — anyone who imperils the nation’s whiteness can be sent “back” to Africa.
“We do not mean to go to Liberia,” Douglass <a href="https://utc.iath.virginia.edu/abolitn/abar03at.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">proclaimed in 1849</a>. “Our minds are made up to live here if we can, or die here if we must; so every attempt to remove us will be, as it ought to be, labor lost.” His words were prophetic.
Two hundred years after the ACS came into being, Liberia endures as a sovereign republic, a diverse nation that represents freedom in all its complexity. Black America has gone nowhere. The colonizationist fantasy, to rule Liberia and to make America white, failed. So must its latter-day heir.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/colonize-then-deport-now/">Colonize Then, Deport Now</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/colonize-then-deport-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311315</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25221593809141-scaled.jpg?width=877&height=585" length="639159" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25221593809141-scaled.jpg?width=877&height=585" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Hot for Teacher</title>
<link>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/hot-for-teacher/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=hot-for-teacher</link>
<comments>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/hot-for-teacher/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siddhant Adlakha]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Arts & Culture]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[LGBTQIA+]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[TD Original]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[ballet]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Dag Johan Haugerud]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[norway]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[oslo]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[queer cinema]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.truthdig.com/?p=311304</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The queer coming-of-age drama “Dreams” captures the rush of young, forbidden love.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/hot-for-teacher/">Hot for Teacher</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
Dag Johan Haugerud’s “Dreams” — the third chapter in his loose Oslo trilogy, following<a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/intimate-in-oslo/"> “Sex” and “Love”</a> — is a tender teenage saga about a lovelorn high schooler who falls for her female teacher. Like its predecessors, it seeks the holy in the mundane, and uses the Norway capital’s architecture as a mirror for its characters’ introspections. However, unlike the previous entries, it’s a voice-over heavy piece that wields narration to probe the troubled expressions of remarkable teen actress Ella Øverbye. The result is a coming-of-age story that feels like something genuinely new in nouveau queer cinema.
The movie follows 16-year-old Johanne (Øverbye), a ballet dancer who has recently quit the hobby over its gender rigidity. On the first day of school, she becomes smitten with her French literature instructor Johanna (Selome Emnetu), a well-traveled woman of unspecified ethnicity (the actress playing her is Eritrean). The young, lovestruck Johanne grows more distracted by the day, until she concocts excuses to show up at the teacher’s high-rise apartment. Before we’re shown what transpires behind closed doors — it’s more innocent than initially suggested, but far more emotionally complicated — Haugerud reveals that at least some of Johanne’s narrations are excerpts from a memoir penned a year after the depicted rendezvous.
The only people she trusts with her writing are her poet grandmother Karin (Anne Marit Jacobsen) and her publisher mother Kristin (Ane Dahl Torp), who debate the nature and meaning of Johanne’s confession while critiquing her prose. They suspect the manuscript is worthy of being published, though they worry that it might be a veiled account of emotional abuse. They’re both single and romantically unfulfilled, and their work seldom loves them back, scenarios of rejection that Johanne recognizes all too well, once she matures enough to do so.
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignleft has-text-align-left"><blockquote>A coming-of-age story that feels like something genuinely new in nouveau queer cinema.</blockquote></figure>
The debate between Karin and Kristin over what to do with the memoir is the film’s window to the past, through which we’re shown the events as they transpired from Johanne’s ecstatic point of view. Although they were never physically intimate, the time the schoolteacher Johanna spent teaching Johanne to knit after hours left an indelible mark on the suggestible teen, who writes of adolescent, sensual yearning. Whenever we see them together, Johanne’s naïve recollections are masked by a warm, rose-tinted glow, a flourish Haugerud and cinematographer Cecilie Semec reserve for the crescendos of prior entries. In “Dreams,” ethereal shimmers represent teenage nostalgia for the small comforts of unconsummated intimacy.
The voice-over device allows Haugerud to dramatize the way all-encompassing teenage love colors Johanne’s every waking moment; her conversations with her teenage peers say one thing, but her imagination is consumed by the fantasy of being desired. She seeks solace and closure in writing about her crush, which she believes, deep down, was reciprocated. Her recollections are peppered with astute observations about Oslo and its architecture, making the film a worthy thematic successor to “Sex” and “Love,” both of which were built on metaphors about municipal architecture. En route to her teacher’s apartment one evening, traipsing through an immigrant neighborhood, scored by composer Anna Berg’s upbeat percussions, the spring in Johanne’s step is accompanied by her reflections on class and religion, including her envy of her teacher’s pious, more traditional background. As the young writer looks up at the skyscrapers surrounding Johanna’s building, a flashing Deloitte logo towers over her, a symbol of the capitalism that has enervated communal bonds and replaced beautiful buildings — a subtle undercurrent throughout the trilogy.
The story’s emotional grays, especially in the final act, bring the teacher’s questionable behavior into focus without being preachy or didactic. Instead, Haugerud unspools his drama through convincing approximations of teenage girlhood in all its silent self-loathing and eruptive desire (and across a story that, notably, features no significant male presence). The camera never leers at the movie’s queer female characters, but studies the visual and emotional details of the teenage sapphic gaze: how sweaters shape the body, the way thrilling romantic highs give way to steep crashes. For Johanne, this brief moment in time is “the most beautiful thing [she’ll] ever experience.” While adult viewers might know better intellectually, her emotional truths are rendered in such vivid, pulsing hues that it’s hard to disagree with her.
The post <a href="https://www.truthdig.com/articles/hot-for-teacher/">Hot for Teacher</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.truthdig.com">Truthdig</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://www.truthdig.com/articles/hot-for-teacher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">311304</post-id> <enclosure url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/02_Selome-Emmetu-Ella-Overbye_@AgneteBrun_K1.jpg?width=805&height=585" length="3426238" type="image/jpeg" />
<media:thumbnail url="https://truthdig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/02_Selome-Emmetu-Ella-Overbye_@AgneteBrun_K1.jpg?width=805&height=585" />
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

If you would like to create a banner that links to this page (i.e. this validation result), do the following:

Download the "valid RSS" banner.
Upload the image to your own server. (This step is important. Please do not link directly to the image on this server.)
Add this HTML to your page (change the image src attribute if necessary):

<a href="http://www.feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=https%3A//www.truthdig.com/feed"><img src="valid-rss-rogers.png" alt="[Valid RSS]" title="Validate my RSS feed" /></a>

If you would like to create a text link instead, here is the URL you can use:

http://www.feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=https%3A//www.truthdig.com/feed

Home · About · News · Docs · Terms