Congratulations!

[Valid RSS] This is a valid RSS feed.

Recommendations

This feed is valid, but interoperability with the widest range of feed readers could be improved by implementing the following recommendations.

Source: https://cricfevers.com/feed/

  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
  2. xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  3. xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  4. xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  5. xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
  6. xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  7. xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
  8. >
  9.  
  10. <channel>
  11. <title>Cric Fevers</title>
  12. <atom:link href="https://cricfevers.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
  13. <link>https://cricfevers.com/</link>
  14. <description>Get the latest Cricket News, Match analysis, Games, Technology, finance and more. Stay updated with Cricket analysis insights and more.</description>
  15. <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 08:56:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  16. <language>en-US</language>
  17. <sy:updatePeriod>
  18. hourly </sy:updatePeriod>
  19. <sy:updateFrequency>
  20. 1 </sy:updateFrequency>
  21. <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
  22.  
  23. 
  30. <item>
  31. <title>Denver Nuggets vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats Revealed</title>
  32. <link>https://cricfevers.com/denver-nuggets-vs-phoenix-suns-match-player-stats/</link>
  33. <comments>https://cricfevers.com/denver-nuggets-vs-phoenix-suns-match-player-stats/#respond</comments>
  34. <dc:creator><![CDATA[cricfevers cricfevers]]></dc:creator>
  35. <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 08:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
  36. <category><![CDATA[Match Matrix]]></category>
  37. <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cricfevers.com/?p=1327</guid>
  38.  
  39. <description><![CDATA[<p>The basketball fans were treated to magic on March 7, 2025, at Ball arena in Denver. The Denver Nuggets vs Phoenix Suns match player stats revealed not just numbers but a narrative of grit, dominance, and a never-before-seen performance. It wasn’t just a regular-season contest. It was history. Nikola Jokic managed to achieve an unforgettable [&#8230;]</p>
  40. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/denver-nuggets-vs-phoenix-suns-match-player-stats/">Denver Nuggets vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats Revealed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  41. ]]></description>
  42. <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The basketball fans were treated to magic on March 7, 2025, at Ball arena in Denver. The Denver Nuggets vs Phoenix Suns match player stats revealed not just numbers but a narrative of grit, dominance, and a never-before-seen performance. It wasn’t just a regular-season contest. It was history. Nikola Jokic managed to achieve an unforgettable triple-double (30-20-20) and became the first basketball player in the history of the NBA to reach 30+ points, 20+ rebounds and 20+ assists min the triple-double in his career. Fans screamed. Analysts applauded. History books added a new chapter.</span></p>
  43. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But Jokic wasn’t alone. Aaron Gordon had a career-best night from three-point range. Christian Braun turned into a clutch-time hero. The Phoenix Suns responded with their own fireworks—especially Kevin Durant and Devin Booker, who kept the Suns alive deep into overtime. This wasn’t just basketball. It was a masterpiece.</span></p>
  44. <h2><b>A Game of Surges, Swings, and Pure Heart</b></h2>
  45. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This game had twists and turns and even going up to buzzer, nothing could be predicted. Denver was aggressive right out of the gates with a lead of 9 points in the first quarter. The court vision, the perimeter shooting, and the team chemistry of Jokic, Gordon, and Nuggets were invincible.</span></p>
  46. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But the Suns weren’t out. Devin Booker exploded for 16 points in the fourth quarter, helping Phoenix come back from a 21-point deficit. Kevin Durant nailed a buzzer-beating three to send the game into overtime.</span></p>
  47. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Overtime belonged to Denver. Jokic’s floater, followed by a 7-0 team run, crushed Phoenix’s momentum. Braun sealed the deal with a cold-blooded three-pointer.</span></p>
  48. <h3><b>Quarterly Score Breakdown</b></h3>
  49. <table>
  50. <tbody>
  51. <tr>
  52. <td><b>Team</b></td>
  53. <td><b>Q1</b></td>
  54. <td><b>Q2</b></td>
  55. <td><b>Q3</b></td>
  56. <td><b>Q4</b></td>
  57. <td><b>OT</b></td>
  58. <td><b>Total</b></td>
  59. </tr>
  60. <tr>
  61. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Suns</span></td>
  62. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">28</span></td>
  63. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">28</span></td>
  64. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">35</span></td>
  65. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">34</span></td>
  66. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">16</span></td>
  67. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">141</span></td>
  68. </tr>
  69. <tr>
  70. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nuggets</span></td>
  71. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">37</span></td>
  72. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">31</span></td>
  73. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">34</span></td>
  74. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23</span></td>
  75. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">24</span></td>
  76. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">149</span></td>
  77. </tr>
  78. </tbody>
  79. </table>
  80. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Denver’s early dominance and overtime burst made the difference.</span></p>
  81. <h2><b>The Triple-Double That Rewrote NBA History</b></h2>
  82. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nikola Jokic wasn’t just the best player on the court—he was unstoppable. His stat line: 31 points, 21 rebounds, and 22 assists. This was more than a performance. It was legacy work.</span></p>
  83. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This triple-double wasn’t just rare—it was unprecedented. No player in NBA history has ever managed 30-20-20 in a single game. It was Jokic’s 29th triple-double of the season, matching his own franchise record.</span></p>
  84. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">He controlled the pace. He found open teammates. He rebounded like a machine. He was Denver’s engine from start to finish.</span></p>
  85. <h2><b>Dominance Across the Stat Sheet</b></h2>
  86. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Beyond Jokic, Denver shined as a team. They were making passes, holding the ball and out-rebounding Phoenix at the most critical moments. The Suns were trying their best but could not do it in overtime due to turnover and failed shots.</span></p>
  87. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Here’s how team stats shaped the outcome.</span></p>
  88. <h3><b>Team Performance Comparison</b></h3>
  89. <table>
  90. <tbody>
  91. <tr>
  92. <td><b>Stat Category</b></td>
  93. <td><b>Phoenix Suns</b></td>
  94. <td><b>Denver Nuggets</b></td>
  95. </tr>
  96. <tr>
  97. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Points in Paint</span></td>
  98. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">56</span></td>
  99. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">64</span></td>
  100. </tr>
  101. <tr>
  102. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Fast Break Points</span></td>
  103. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">14</span></td>
  104. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">31</span></td>
  105. </tr>
  106. <tr>
  107. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Biggest Lead</span></td>
  108. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  109. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">21</span></td>
  110. </tr>
  111. <tr>
  112. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bench Points</span></td>
  113. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">44</span></td>
  114. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">31</span></td>
  115. </tr>
  116. <tr>
  117. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Total Rebounds</span></td>
  118. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">48</span></td>
  119. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">51</span></td>
  120. </tr>
  121. <tr>
  122. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Turnovers</span></td>
  123. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></td>
  124. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  125. </tr>
  126. <tr>
  127. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Points Off TO</span></td>
  128. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">18</span></td>
  129. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">19</span></td>
  130. </tr>
  131. </tbody>
  132. </table>
  133. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Denver’s speed and ball control proved crucial in overtime.</span></p>
  134. <h2><b>When Stars Collide: Booker, Durant, and Gordon Shine?</b></h2>
  135. <p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1330" src="https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/J-5.webp" alt="Denver Nuggets vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats" width="1200" height="630" srcset="https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/J-5.webp 1200w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/J-5-300x158.webp 300w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/J-5-1024x538.webp 1024w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/J-5-768x403.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /></p>
  136. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Booker scored 34 points, including 16 in the fourth. His footwork, shooting range, and poise were elite—until overtime, where he went cold. Kevin Durant posted 29 points, hit 3 threes, and gave Phoenix life with a buzzer-beating shot that sent the game to OT.</span></p>
  137. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aaron Gordon stepped up big. He knocked down seven 3-pointers, his career best, finishing with 27 points. Gordon’s range opened lanes for Jokic and forced Phoenix’s defense to stretch. Christian Braun emerged late with key plays and crucial buckets. </span></p>
  138. <h2><b>The Energy at Ball Arena</b></h2>
  139. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This wasn’t just a game—it was a Denver celebration. 19,808 fans packed the Ball Arena and witnessed history unfold. Every Jokic assist, every Gordon triple, every Braun hustle play brought the crowd to its feet.</span></p>
  140. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Officials kept the game clean and flowing, allowing the stars to do what they do best.</span></p>
  141. <h3><b>Game Details</b></h3>
  142. <table>
  143. <tbody>
  144. <tr>
  145. <td><b>Detail</b></td>
  146. <td><b>Info</b></td>
  147. </tr>
  148. <tr>
  149. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Officials</span></td>
  150. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Scott Foster, Tre Maddox, Phenizee Ransom</span></td>
  151. </tr>
  152. <tr>
  153. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Location</span></td>
  154. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ball Arena, Denver, CO</span></td>
  155. </tr>
  156. <tr>
  157. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Attendance</span></td>
  158. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">19,808</span></td>
  159. </tr>
  160. <tr>
  161. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Date</span></td>
  162. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">March 7, 2025</span></td>
  163. </tr>
  164. </tbody>
  165. </table>
  166. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The stage was set, and both teams delivered.</span></p>
  167. <h2><b>What the Box Scores Show?</b></h2>
  168. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Let’s take a close look at the individual stats that influenced the game. This table gives you a full picture of how the top players performed in every major category.</span></p>
  169. <h3><b>Individual Player Box Stats</b></h3>
  170. <table>
  171. <tbody>
  172. <tr>
  173. <td><b>Player</b></td>
  174. <td><b>Points</b></td>
  175. <td><b>Rebounds</b></td>
  176. <td><b>Assists</b></td>
  177. <td><b>3PM (3-Point Made)</b></td>
  178. </tr>
  179. <tr>
  180. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nikola Jokic</span></td>
  181. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">31</span></td>
  182. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">21</span></td>
  183. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">22</span></td>
  184. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  185. </tr>
  186. <tr>
  187. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aaron Gordon</span></td>
  188. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">27</span></td>
  189. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  190. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  191. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  192. </tr>
  193. <tr>
  194. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Christian Braun</span></td>
  195. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">15</span></td>
  196. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  197. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  198. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  199. </tr>
  200. <tr>
  201. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kevin Durant</span></td>
  202. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">29</span></td>
  203. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  204. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  205. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  206. </tr>
  207. <tr>
  208. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Devin Booker</span></td>
  209. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">34</span></td>
  210. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  211. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  212. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  213. </tr>
  214. <tr>
  215. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mason Plumlee</span></td>
  216. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">18</span></td>
  217. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></td>
  218. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  219. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  220. </tr>
  221. </tbody>
  222. </table>
  223. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">These Denver Nuggets vs Phoenix Suns match player stats tell a story of two teams filled with stars and clutch performers.</span></p>
  224. <h2><b>Suns’ Missed Opportunity in OT</b></h2>
  225. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Phoenix had the momentum. Down 21, they roared back, took a late lead, and forced OT with Durant’s dagger three. But in overtime, they scored just 2 points in 3 minutes. Booker, the hero of the fourth, was scoreless in OT. The offense stalled. Denver’s defense rose to the occasion. Phoenix’s bench contributed more overall, but Denver’s timely plays proved more impactful.</span></p>
  226. <h2><b>Denver&#8217;s Depth Beats Star Power</b></h2>
  227. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">What made the difference? Depth. While the Suns leaned on Durant and Booker, the Nuggets distributed responsibility. Braun hit threes. Gordon drew defenders out. Jokic did everything. The entire roster contributed, especially in extra time. Championship teams aren’t just built on stars—they’re built on moments. And Denver created more of them.</span></p>
  228. <h2><b>How the Nuggets’ Style Outlasted Phoenix?</b></h2>
  229. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Denver leads the league in assists. They had 38 in this game. Their offense is built on movement, screens, and unselfish play. It’s hard to stop when it’s clicking. Phoenix leaned into isolation. It worked… until it didn’t. Tired legs, tight defense, and stagnation killed their momentum. When it came time to execute under pressure, Denver’s passing game won.</span></p>
  230. <h2><b>Upcoming Fixtures for Both Teams</b></h2>
  231. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Looking ahead, these teams continue facing pressure matchups in a crowded Western Conference race.</span></p>
  232. <ul>
  233. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Denver Nuggets: Next play Oklahoma City Thunder for two straight road games.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  234. </span></li>
  235. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Phoenix Suns: Head to Dallas Mavericks looking to bounce back.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  236. </span></li>
  237. </ul>
  238. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Both matchups will reveal how each team responds to this thriller.</span></p>
  239. <h3><b>Final Take: A Game for the Ages</b></h3>
  240. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This wasn&#8217;t just a win for Denver. It was a defining game in their season. The Denver Nuggets vs Phoenix Suns match player stats reflect how discipline, trust, and teamwork outperform even the most explosive offensive duos. Jokic added to his MVP legacy. Gordon proved he can be more than a dunker. Braun showed his clutch under pressure. The Suns, though full of talent, couldn’t finish strong. This game will be rewatched, analyzed, and remembered.</span></p>
  241. <p><strong>Read More Blogs:-) </strong><a title="Permalink to: Houston Rockets vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Full Breakdown" href="https://cricfevers.com/houston-rockets-vs-lakers-match-player-stats/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Houston Rockets vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Full Breakdown</a></p>
  242. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/denver-nuggets-vs-phoenix-suns-match-player-stats/">Denver Nuggets vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats Revealed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  243. ]]></content:encoded>
  244. <wfw:commentRss>https://cricfevers.com/denver-nuggets-vs-phoenix-suns-match-player-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  245. <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
  246. </item>
  247. <item>
  248. <title>Miny vs Waf: A Final That Rewrote MLC History</title>
  249. <link>https://cricfevers.com/miny-vs-waf/</link>
  250. <comments>https://cricfevers.com/miny-vs-waf/#respond</comments>
  251. <dc:creator><![CDATA[cricfevers cricfevers]]></dc:creator>
  252. <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
  253. <category><![CDATA[Match Matrix]]></category>
  254. <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cricfevers.com/?p=1324</guid>
  255.  
  256. <description><![CDATA[<p>Cricket in America just had its greatest moment. The final between MI New York (MINY) and Washington Freedom (WAF) gave fans everything they could hope for. Close finish. Heroic performances. Drama till the last ball. This miny vs waf match wasn’t just a game. It was a celebration of Major League Cricket&#8217;s rise. The stage [&#8230;]</p>
  257. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/miny-vs-waf/">Miny vs Waf: A Final That Rewrote MLC History</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  258. ]]></description>
  259. <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Cricket in America just had its greatest moment. The final between MI New York (MINY) and Washington Freedom (WAF) gave fans everything they could hope for. Close finish. Heroic performances. Drama till the last ball. This miny vs waf match wasn’t just a game. It was a celebration of Major League Cricket&#8217;s rise. The stage was Grand Prairie Stadium in Dallas. The crowd? Electric. Everyone knew this one would be big. No one expected just how big.</span></p>
  260. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">MINY batted first. They set a solid score. WAF came close in the chase. But they fell short by 5 runs. Just five runs. The tension? Off the charts. This final proved that cricket in the U.S. is here to stay. Let’s walk through the best moments, performances, stats, and what this result means for MLC’s future.</span></p>
  261. <h2><b>High Stakes and Smart Starts</b></h2>
  262. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">WAF won the toss. They chose to bowl. It was a brave call. Chasing is easier in T20s. But finals add pressure. MINY’s batters were ready. They went after the bowlers early. The powerplay saw quick runs. De Kock and Patel looked sharp. Boundaries flowed. The fielders had no chance. It looked like MINY had a plan. And it was working.</span></p>
  263. <h2><b>MINY’s Powerplay Push Paid Off</b></h2>
  264. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The opening pair gave MINY momentum. Quinton de Kock was unstoppable. He smashed boundaries all around the ground. Monank Patel kept things steady. Their 72-run stand laid a strong base.</span></p>
  265. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">MINY lost a few quick wickets in the middle. But tail-enders chipped in. The final score? 180/7 in 20 overs. A challenging total on a big night.</span></p>
  266. <h3><b>Final Match Summary: miny vs waf</b></h3>
  267. <table>
  268. <tbody>
  269. <tr>
  270. <td><b>Team</b></td>
  271. <td><b>Total Runs</b></td>
  272. <td><b>Wickets Lost</b></td>
  273. <td><b>Overs</b></td>
  274. <td><b>Result</b></td>
  275. </tr>
  276. <tr>
  277. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">MI New York (MINY)</span></td>
  278. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">180</span></td>
  279. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  280. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">20</span></td>
  281. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Won by 5 runs</span></td>
  282. </tr>
  283. <tr>
  284. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Washington Freedom</span></td>
  285. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">175</span></td>
  286. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  287. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">20</span></td>
  288. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lost</span></td>
  289. </tr>
  290. </tbody>
  291. </table>
  292. <h2><b>WAF’s Chase: Close, But Not Enough</b></h2>
  293. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Washington Freedom started with a shock. Mitchell Owen got out on the first ball. That hurt. Then Gous followed. 0 for 2. But Rachin Ravindra and Jack Edwards rebuilt smartly.</span></p>
  294. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ravindra played the innings of the night. He scored 70. Calm, confident, and composed. Glenn Phillips added to the total. But they couldn’t find enough big shots in the final overs.</span></p>
  295. <h3><b>Washington Freedom Innings Breakdown</b></h3>
  296. <table>
  297. <tbody>
  298. <tr>
  299. <td><b>Batter</b></td>
  300. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  301. <td><b>Balls</b></td>
  302. <td><b>SR</b></td>
  303. </tr>
  304. <tr>
  305. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rachin Ravindra</span></td>
  306. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">70</span></td>
  307. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">41</span></td>
  308. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">170.73</span></td>
  309. </tr>
  310. <tr>
  311. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Glenn Phillips</span></td>
  312. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">48*</span></td>
  313. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">34</span></td>
  314. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">141.18</span></td>
  315. </tr>
  316. <tr>
  317. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jack Edwards</span></td>
  318. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">33</span></td>
  319. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">22</span></td>
  320. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">150.00</span></td>
  321. </tr>
  322. <tr>
  323. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Glenn Maxwell</span></td>
  324. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">15</span></td>
  325. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">16</span></td>
  326. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">93.75</span></td>
  327. </tr>
  328. </tbody>
  329. </table>
  330. <h2><b>Bowling Heroes of the Night</b></h2>
  331. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">MINY’s bowlers kept their cool. Trent Boult struck early. Rushil Ugarkar was calm under pressure. Even Pollard bowled tight overs. Each bowler played their role perfectly.</span></p>
  332. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">On the WAF side, Lockie Ferguson was fire. He got 3 wickets. Maxwell chipped in too. But they couldn&#8217;t stop de Kock early. That was the difference.</span></p>
  333. <h3><b>Bowling Impact Analysis</b></h3>
  334. <table>
  335. <tbody>
  336. <tr>
  337. <td><b>Bowler</b></td>
  338. <td><b>Team</b></td>
  339. <td><b>Overs</b></td>
  340. <td><b>Wickets</b></td>
  341. <td><b>Economy</b></td>
  342. </tr>
  343. <tr>
  344. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Trent Boult</span></td>
  345. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">MINY</span></td>
  346. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  347. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  348. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8.00</span></td>
  349. </tr>
  350. <tr>
  351. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rushil Ugarkar</span></td>
  352. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">MINY</span></td>
  353. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  354. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  355. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8.00</span></td>
  356. </tr>
  357. <tr>
  358. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lockie Ferguson</span></td>
  359. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">WAF</span></td>
  360. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  361. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  362. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.20</span></td>
  363. </tr>
  364. <tr>
  365. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Glenn Maxwell</span></td>
  366. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">WAF</span></td>
  367. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  368. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  369. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11.50</span></td>
  370. </tr>
  371. </tbody>
  372. </table>
  373. <h2><b>Key Moments That Changed Everything</b></h2>
  374. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Finals come down to moments. Here, a few changed the game. Pooran’s dismissal hurt MINY’s scoring rate. But Rushil’s last over turned the match. One tight over. Two wickets. That was all it took. WAF couldn’t hit a six when it mattered. That final ball dot by Ugarkar? Pure gold.</span></p>
  375. <h3><b>Key Wicket Timeline</b></h3>
  376. <table>
  377. <tbody>
  378. <tr>
  379. <td><b>Team</b></td>
  380. <td><b>Wicket Lost</b></td>
  381. <td><b>Fall of Wicket (Overs)</b></td>
  382. </tr>
  383. <tr>
  384. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">MINY</span></td>
  385. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Monank Patel</span></td>
  386. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.1</span></td>
  387. </tr>
  388. <tr>
  389. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">MINY</span></td>
  390. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pooran</span></td>
  391. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">15.4</span></td>
  392. </tr>
  393. <tr>
  394. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">WAF</span></td>
  395. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mitchell Owen</span></td>
  396. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.1</span></td>
  397. </tr>
  398. <tr>
  399. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">WAF</span></td>
  400. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jack Edwards</span></td>
  401. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8.2</span></td>
  402. </tr>
  403. <tr>
  404. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">WAF</span></td>
  405. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Glenn Maxwell</span></td>
  406. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">19.4</span></td>
  407. </tr>
  408. </tbody>
  409. </table>
  410. <h2><b>Match MVP: Rushil Ugarkar Steps Up</b></h2>
  411. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rushil was fearless. He bowled the final over. He knew it could go either way. But he believed. He stuck to slower balls. His plan worked. He was awarded Player of the Match. And he deserved it. From getting hit in earlier games to now—what a journey.</span></p>
  412. <h2><b>Captain Pooran’s Vision Pays Off</b></h2>
  413. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pooran led from the front. With the bat and with his mind. He trusted the young bowlers and stayed calm. He made good bowling changes. After the win, he spoke about belief. About trusting your squad. About building something strong. His leadership is a big reason for MINY’s second title.</span></p>
  414. <h2><b>A Word from the Coaches</b></h2>
  415. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mark Boucher was proud. He praised his squad’s unity. “We stuck together,” he said. “Even after losses, the boys didn’t break.” That mindset won them the final. Ricky Ponting, WAF’s coach, handled the loss with class. He said, “We gave it everything. But finals are about small margins.” He’s right. WAF were one big hit away from glory.</span></p>
  416. <h2><b>Tournament Awards: Best of the Best</b></h2>
  417. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The MLC season had many stars. Some dominated with the bat. Others with the ball. Here’s who stood out the most.</span></p>
  418. <h3><b>MLC 2025 Awards Recap</b></h3>
  419. <table>
  420. <tbody>
  421. <tr>
  422. <td><b>Award</b></td>
  423. <td><b>Winner</b></td>
  424. </tr>
  425. <tr>
  426. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Player of the Match</span></td>
  427. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rushil Ugarkar</span></td>
  428. </tr>
  429. <tr>
  430. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Player of the Series</span></td>
  431. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mitchell Owen</span></td>
  432. </tr>
  433. <tr>
  434. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Most Runs (Tournament)</span></td>
  435. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Monank Patel</span></td>
  436. </tr>
  437. <tr>
  438. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Most Wickets (Tournament)</span></td>
  439. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Xavier Bartlett</span></td>
  440. </tr>
  441. <tr>
  442. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Best Domestic Player</span></td>
  443. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Monank Patel</span></td>
  444. </tr>
  445. <tr>
  446. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">U23 Player of the Tournament</span></td>
  447. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rushil Ugarkar</span></td>
  448. </tr>
  449. </tbody>
  450. </table>
  451. <h2><b>Social Media Went Wild</b></h2>
  452. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As the match ended, Twitter exploded. #minyvswaf started trending. Fans praised Ugarkar. Others cried for WAF. Videos of the final moments went viral. One fan called it, “the best final in MLC ever.” And they weren’t wrong. The world watched. The world reacted.</span></p>
  453. <h2><b>Why miny vs waf Will Be Remembered Forever?</b></h2>
  454. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">There are good matches. There are great matches. Then there are matches like miny vs waf. So close, intense and emotional. It had everything. For MINY, it’s a title. For WAF, it’s heartbreak. But for cricket? It’s growth. This match showed the world that cricket in America is real. And it’s exciting.</span></p>
  455. <h2><b>Rivalry in the Making?</b></h2>
  456. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Two strong teams. Two close games this season. Big names. Passionate captains. The miny vs waf rivalry is born. Expect more thrillers in the next season. These teams aren’t done yet. The fans want more. And they’ll get it.</span></p>
  457. <h2><b>Top 5 Matches of MLC 2025</b></h2>
  458. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Some games this season were instant classics. But none topped the final. Here’s how the top five ranked.</span></p>
  459. <h3><b>Key Matches in MLC 2025</b></h3>
  460. <table>
  461. <tbody>
  462. <tr>
  463. <td><b>Match</b></td>
  464. <td><b>Winner</b></td>
  465. <td><b>Margin</b></td>
  466. <td><b>Top Performer</b></td>
  467. </tr>
  468. <tr>
  469. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">MINY vs WAF (Final)</span></td>
  470. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">MI New York</span></td>
  471. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5 runs</span></td>
  472. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Quinton de Kock (77)</span></td>
  473. </tr>
  474. <tr>
  475. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">WAF vs SFU (Qualifier)</span></td>
  476. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Washington Freedom</span></td>
  477. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">21 runs</span></td>
  478. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Glenn Maxwell (68*)</span></td>
  479. </tr>
  480. <tr>
  481. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">MINY vs TSK (Eliminator)</span></td>
  482. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">MI New York</span></td>
  483. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2 wickets</span></td>
  484. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pollard (41* &amp; 2 wkts)</span></td>
  485. </tr>
  486. <tr>
  487. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">MINY vs LAKR (League Match)</span></td>
  488. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">MI New York</span></td>
  489. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6 wickets</span></td>
  490. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">de Kock (62)</span></td>
  491. </tr>
  492. <tr>
  493. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">WAF vs Orcas (League Match)</span></td>
  494. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Washington Freedom</span></td>
  495. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8 wickets</span></td>
  496. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rachin Ravindra (54)</span></td>
  497. </tr>
  498. </tbody>
  499. </table>
  500. <h3><b>Final Thoughts: The Legacy of miny vs waf</b></h3>
  501. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This wasn’t just a final. It was a statement. The miny vs waf match showed that Major League Cricket is a serious league. It has stars. It has fans. And now—it has history. For MI New York, it&#8217;s another trophy. For Washington Freedom, its motivation for  cricket fans. It&#8217;s a new rivalry to follow. And for MLC—it’s only the beginning. The confetti has settled. But the echoes of this match will live on.</span></p>
  502. <p><strong>Read More Blogs:-) </strong><a title="Permalink to: India National Cricket Team vs South Africa National Cricket Team Match Scorecard" href="https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-south-africa-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">India National Cricket Team vs South Africa National Cricket Team Match Scorecard</a></p>
  503. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/miny-vs-waf/">Miny vs Waf: A Final That Rewrote MLC History</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  504. ]]></content:encoded>
  505. <wfw:commentRss>https://cricfevers.com/miny-vs-waf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  506. <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
  507. </item>
  508. <item>
  509. <title>Zimbabwe National Cricket Team vs South Africa National Cricket Team Match Scorecard Details</title>
  510. <link>https://cricfevers.com/zimbabwe-national-cricket-team-vs-south-africa-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/</link>
  511. <comments>https://cricfevers.com/zimbabwe-national-cricket-team-vs-south-africa-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/#respond</comments>
  512. <dc:creator><![CDATA[cricfevers cricfevers]]></dc:creator>
  513. <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 06:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
  514. <category><![CDATA[Match Matrix]]></category>
  515. <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cricfevers.com/?p=1317</guid>
  516.  
  517. <description><![CDATA[<p>This match was more than just a warm-up. The Zimbabwe national cricket team vs South Africa national cricket team match scorecard was followed by many. Both teams treated it as a final rehearsal. Players had one last chance to show form. The match was played ahead of the ICC World Test Championship Final 2025. The [&#8230;]</p>
  518. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/zimbabwe-national-cricket-team-vs-south-africa-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/">Zimbabwe National Cricket Team vs South Africa National Cricket Team Match Scorecard Details</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  519. ]]></description>
  520. <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This match was more than just a warm-up. The Zimbabwe national cricket team vs South Africa national cricket team match scorecard was followed by many. Both teams treated it as a final rehearsal. Players had one last chance to show form. The match was played ahead of the ICC World Test Championship Final 2025.</span></p>
  521. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The venue, Arundel Castle in England, added charm to the game. It was peaceful yet competitive. Coaches from both teams wanted answers—Who’s fit? Who’s ready? Who can deliver under pressure?</span></p>
  522. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">South Africa came in strong. Zimbabwe looked to gain exposure. Fans waited to check stats. Media outlets followed every over. Though it wasn’t a ranking match, it gave clues about strategies and final XI decisions.</span></p>
  523. <h2><b>Where and When the Match Happened?</b></h2>
  524. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This was a four-day match with no official results. It was designed to let both teams get real-time match practice. The game was scheduled early June. The timing suited both teams who were adjusting to English conditions.</span></p>
  525. <h3><b>Match Details and Player Info</b></h3>
  526. <table>
  527. <tbody>
  528. <tr>
  529. <td><b>Match</b></td>
  530. <td><b>Type</b></td>
  531. <td><b>Dates</b></td>
  532. <td><b>Venue</b></td>
  533. <td><b>Start Time (GMT)</b></td>
  534. <td><b>Start Time (Local)</b></td>
  535. </tr>
  536. <tr>
  537. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Zimbabwe vs South Africa</span></td>
  538. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4-Day Warm-up</span></td>
  539. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">June 3–6, 2025</span></td>
  540. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Arundel Castle, Arundel</span></td>
  541. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10:00 AM</span></td>
  542. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3:30 PM</span></td>
  543. </tr>
  544. </tbody>
  545. </table>
  546. <h2><b>Strong Line-Up from South Africa</b></h2>
  547. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The South African side did not hold back. Key players were present. Their squad had speed, spin, power, and experience. Even the bench had exciting names. Each player had a clear role. Coaches wanted every spot covered before the final.</span></p>
  548. <h3><b>South Africa Squad</b></h3>
  549. <ul>
  550. <li><b>Players</b></li>
  551. </ul>
  552. <ol>
  553. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Temba Bavuma (C)</span></li>
  554. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tony de Zorzi</span></li>
  555. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aiden Markram</span></li>
  556. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Wiaan Mulder</span></li>
  557. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Marco Jansen</span></li>
  558. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kagiso Rabada</span></li>
  559. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Keshav Maharaj</span></li>
  560. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lungi Ngidi</span></li>
  561. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Corbin Bosch</span></li>
  562. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kyle Verreynne</span></li>
  563. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">David Bedingham</span></li>
  564. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tristan Stubbs</span></li>
  565. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ryan Rickelton</span></li>
  566. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Senuran Muthusamy</span></li>
  567. <li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Dane Paterson</span></li>
  568. </ol>
  569. <h2><b>Match Progress and How It Was Played?</b></h2>
  570. <p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1319" src="https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/J-2.webp" alt="Zimbabwe National Cricket Team vs South Africa National Cricket Team Match Scorecard " width="1200" height="630" srcset="https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/J-2.webp 1200w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/J-2-300x158.webp 300w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/J-2-1024x538.webp 1024w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/J-2-768x403.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /></p>
  571. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This warm-up was structured like a Test, but the rules were flexible. The innings were not limited by wickets. Teams could bat as long as needed. The focus was on form and fitness. The final scorecard was delayed, but team strategies were visible.</span></p>
  572. <h3><b>Match Timeline</b></h3>
  573. <table>
  574. <tbody>
  575. <tr>
  576. <td><b>Innings</b></td>
  577. <td><b>Team</b></td>
  578. <td><b>Activity</b></td>
  579. <td><b>Result</b></td>
  580. </tr>
  581. <tr>
  582. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1st</span></td>
  583. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">South Africa</span></td>
  584. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Batting Practice</span></td>
  585. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Not Published</span></td>
  586. </tr>
  587. <tr>
  588. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1st</span></td>
  589. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Zimbabwe</span></td>
  590. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Response Innings</span></td>
  591. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Not Published</span></td>
  592. </tr>
  593. <tr>
  594. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2nd</span></td>
  595. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">South Africa</span></td>
  596. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Extended Session</span></td>
  597. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Not Published</span></td>
  598. </tr>
  599. <tr>
  600. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2nd</span></td>
  601. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Zimbabwe</span></td>
  602. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Final Batting</span></td>
  603. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Not Published</span></td>
  604. </tr>
  605. </tbody>
  606. </table>
  607. <h2><b>Player Monitoring Was Key</b></h2>
  608. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This match gave selectors a live view. Form cannot be guessed in nets. In real matches, timing, fitness, and focus are tested. Coaches from both camps had their eyes fixed on top names. Performance in this game would affect big selections.</span></p>
  609. <h3><b>Players to Watch</b></h3>
  610. <table>
  611. <tbody>
  612. <tr>
  613. <td><b>Player</b></td>
  614. <td><b>Role</b></td>
  615. <td><b>What to Watch?</b></td>
  616. </tr>
  617. <tr>
  618. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Temba Bavuma</span></td>
  619. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Captain, Top-order Bat</span></td>
  620. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Match fitness, captaincy clarity</span></td>
  621. </tr>
  622. <tr>
  623. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kagiso Rabada</span></td>
  624. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lead Bowler</span></td>
  625. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rhythm and pace control</span></td>
  626. </tr>
  627. <tr>
  628. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aiden Markram</span></td>
  629. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aggressive Opener</span></td>
  630. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Positive starts with bat</span></td>
  631. </tr>
  632. <tr>
  633. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Marco Jansen</span></td>
  634. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bowling All-rounder</span></td>
  635. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Control with ball and handy runs</span></td>
  636. </tr>
  637. <tr>
  638. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Wiaan Mulder</span></td>
  639. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Middle-order Bat</span></td>
  640. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Stability and runs</span></td>
  641. </tr>
  642. <tr>
  643. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tristan Stubbs</span></td>
  644. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Young Talent</span></td>
  645. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Temperament under pressure</span></td>
  646. </tr>
  647. </tbody>
  648. </table>
  649. <h2><b>Headlines Around the Cricket World</b></h2>
  650. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">While this match was in progress, the cricket world stayed busy. Some headlines gave context to this warm-up. Zimbabwe’s loss to Ireland added pressure. Australia’s dominance showed what South Africa could face next.</span></p>
  651. <h3><b>Cricket Headlines Near Match</b></h3>
  652. <table>
  653. <tbody>
  654. <tr>
  655. <td><b>Headline</b></td>
  656. <td><b>Impact</b></td>
  657. </tr>
  658. <tr>
  659. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Australia completes another clean sweep</span></td>
  660. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Boosts Australia&#8217;s WTC momentum</span></td>
  661. </tr>
  662. <tr>
  663. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ireland sweeps ODI series vs Zimbabwe</span></td>
  664. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Setback for Zimbabwe before warm-up</span></td>
  665. </tr>
  666. <tr>
  667. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jamie Overton added for Oval Test</span></td>
  668. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">England strengthens Test bench</span></td>
  669. </tr>
  670. <tr>
  671. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rishabh Pant bats with fractured toe</span></td>
  672. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pant proves resilience</span></td>
  673. </tr>
  674. <tr>
  675. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">India draws Old Trafford Test</span></td>
  676. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jadeja, Washington shine late</span></td>
  677. </tr>
  678. </tbody>
  679. </table>
  680. <h2><b>Understanding Warm-Up Match Rules</b></h2>
  681. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">These matches follow different rules. They don’t have official tosses. Batters can retire early. Bowlers rotate more often. The goal is exposure—not victory. Every player must get game time. This helps coaches decide on big match combinations.</span></p>
  682. <h3><b>Warm-up Match Structure</b></h3>
  683. <table>
  684. <tbody>
  685. <tr>
  686. <td><b>Feature</b></td>
  687. <td><b>Purpose</b></td>
  688. </tr>
  689. <tr>
  690. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">No Official Toss</span></td>
  691. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Avoid early match bias</span></td>
  692. </tr>
  693. <tr>
  694. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Flexible Batting Order</span></td>
  695. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Give all batters chance</span></td>
  696. </tr>
  697. <tr>
  698. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bowler Rotation</span></td>
  699. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rest and rotate attack</span></td>
  700. </tr>
  701. <tr>
  702. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Retired Out Rule</span></td>
  703. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Maximize player exposure</span></td>
  704. </tr>
  705. <tr>
  706. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Unlimited Fielding Changes</span></td>
  707. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Test all fielding options</span></td>
  708. </tr>
  709. </tbody>
  710. </table>
  711. <h2><b>Zimbabwe’s Takeaways from the Game</b></h2>
  712. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Though Zimbabwe didn’t win, they had much to gain. Facing a top team helped their players adjust. Their bowlers got to test lines and lengths. Batters dealt with speed and spin at the highest level. Youngsters got global exposure.</span></p>
  713. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">They also learned how big teams prepare. Training methods, game reading, and player rotations—Zimbabwe saw all. That makes this match a valuable lesson, despite the missing scorecard.</span></p>
  714. <h2><b>Focus on Match Fitness</b></h2>
  715. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Players used this chance to find form. Someone like Rabada needed overs. Bavuma needed time in the middle. Even substitute players got chances to field, bowl, or hit.</span></p>
  716. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Stubbs and Verreynne had little game time recently. This was their moment. Fielders were tested for agility. All-rounders were tested for balance. Everyone had to show they belonged on the final stage.</span></p>
  717. <h2><b>Impact on Final Selection</b></h2>
  718. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This game wasn&#8217;t part of the ICC World Test Championship itself. But it heavily influenced team picks. South Africa saw which bowlers were sharp. Zimbabwe learned which players stood tall under pressure.</span></p>
  719. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">For example, if Jansen impressed here, he’d get more overs in the final. If Mulder fails with the bat, selectors may try Rickelton. Every innings in this match was like a job interview.</span></p>
  720. <h3><b>Final Word on the Scorecard</b></h3>
  721. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The full Zimbabwe national cricket team vs South Africa national cricket team match scorecard wasn’t released immediately. That upset some fans. But experts still tracked details. And it’s clear this match had value. It&#8217;s shaped choices. It tuned players. It reminded everyone—preparation wins games.</span></p>
  722. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The cricket was real. The lessons were real. The scoreboard might have waited—but its impact showed instantly.</span></p>
  723. <p><strong>Read More Blogs:-) </strong><a title="Permalink to: India National Cricket Team vs Pakistan National Cricket Team Match Scorecard: Full Recap" href="https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-pakistan-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">India National Cricket Team vs Pakistan National Cricket Team Match Scorecard: Full Recap</a></p>
  724. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/zimbabwe-national-cricket-team-vs-south-africa-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/">Zimbabwe National Cricket Team vs South Africa National Cricket Team Match Scorecard Details</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  725. ]]></content:encoded>
  726. <wfw:commentRss>https://cricfevers.com/zimbabwe-national-cricket-team-vs-south-africa-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  727. <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
  728. </item>
  729. <item>
  730. <title>Houston Rockets vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Full Breakdown</title>
  731. <link>https://cricfevers.com/houston-rockets-vs-lakers-match-player-stats/</link>
  732. <comments>https://cricfevers.com/houston-rockets-vs-lakers-match-player-stats/#respond</comments>
  733. <dc:creator><![CDATA[cricfevers cricfevers]]></dc:creator>
  734. <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
  735. <category><![CDATA[Match Matrix]]></category>
  736. <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cricfevers.com/?p=1308</guid>
  737.  
  738. <description><![CDATA[<p>The Houston Rockets vs the Los Angeles Lakers game recently held in the NBA was a game that portrayed a good show of the best of basketball. The match, which was played at Crypto.com Arena on April 11, 2025, resulted in Lakers defeating the opposing team by a huge margin of 140-109 points. This game [&#8230;]</p>
  739. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/houston-rockets-vs-lakers-match-player-stats/">Houston Rockets vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Full Breakdown</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  740. ]]></description>
  741. <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Houston Rockets vs the Los Angeles Lakers game recently held in the NBA was a game that portrayed a good show of the best of basketball. The match, which was played at Crypto.com Arena on April 11, 2025, resulted in Lakers defeating the opposing team by a huge margin of 140-109 points. This game mattered for the playoff race, and the Lakers used it to lock in the No. 3 seed. Both teams brought energy. However, the Lakers dominated with better shooting, tighter defense, and smart ball movement. The Rockets had some standout players, but their overall performance couldn’t match LA’s depth. In this post, we’ll explore the full Houston Rockets vs Lakers match player stats with clarity and structure.</span></p>
  742. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Let’s start by breaking down how each team performed on the court.</span></p>
  743. <h2><b>Match Summary: Rockets Couldn&#8217;t Keep Up</b></h2>
  744. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Rockets started with aggression, but their defense quickly fell apart. The Lakers scored consistently from inside and beyond the arc. Their ball movement created open looks, while their defense caused turnovers and limited Houston’s options.</span></p>
  745. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Houston’s offense had moments of brilliance. Cam Whitmore was electric and scored a game-high for the Rockets. Reed Sheppard and Aaron Holiday supported with good passing and spacing. Still, their team play didn’t match the Lakers’ pace.</span></p>
  746. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Lakers relied on a team-first approach. Luka Dončić took control with scoring and assists. LeBron James played a controlled game. The bench also added value, closing out each quarter with smart play. Overall, the Lakers proved why they’re playoff-ready.</span></p>
  747. <h2><b>Rockets Player Performance: Bright Spots Amid Struggles</b></h2>
  748. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Houston showed promise in individual effort. Cam Whitmore was easily the best performer. He drove to the basket, hit threes, and hustled on rebounds. Sheppard’s playmaking gave Houston offensive rhythm, though it wasn’t enough to hold the lead.</span></p>
  749. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The team struggled with consistency. Shooting was below average. They hit only 45.6% of field goals and 35.3% from three. These numbers affected their ability to keep the score close. The lack of defensive rebounds also hurt them in transition.</span></p>
  750. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Here’s a detailed breakdown of Houston’s key players and their contributions.</span></p>
  751. <h3><b>Houston Rockets Player Stats</b></h3>
  752. <table>
  753. <tbody>
  754. <tr>
  755. <td><b>Player</b></td>
  756. <td><b>Minutes</b></td>
  757. <td><b>Points</b></td>
  758. <td><b>Rebounds</b></td>
  759. <td><b>Assists</b></td>
  760. </tr>
  761. <tr>
  762. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Cam Whitmore</span></td>
  763. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">37:12</span></td>
  764. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">34</span></td>
  765. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  766. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  767. </tr>
  768. <tr>
  769. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jeff Green</span></td>
  770. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">21:55</span></td>
  771. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  772. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  773. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  774. </tr>
  775. <tr>
  776. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jock Landale</span></td>
  777. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">24:30</span></td>
  778. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  779. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  780. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  781. </tr>
  782. <tr>
  783. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jalen Green</span></td>
  784. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">14:58</span></td>
  785. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  786. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  787. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  788. </tr>
  789. <tr>
  790. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Reed Sheppard</span></td>
  791. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">41:08</span></td>
  792. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">14</span></td>
  793. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  794. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  795. </tr>
  796. <tr>
  797. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nate Williams</span></td>
  798. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">26:23</span></td>
  799. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12</span></td>
  800. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  801. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  802. </tr>
  803. <tr>
  804. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">David Roddy</span></td>
  805. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23:51</span></td>
  806. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  807. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  808. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  809. </tr>
  810. <tr>
  811. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">N&#8217;Faly Dante</span></td>
  812. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">14:21</span></td>
  813. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  814. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  815. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  816. </tr>
  817. <tr>
  818. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aaron Holiday</span></td>
  819. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23:42</span></td>
  820. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></td>
  821. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  822. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  823. </tr>
  824. <tr>
  825. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jack McVeigh</span></td>
  826. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12:00</span></td>
  827. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  828. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  829. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  830. </tr>
  831. </tbody>
  832. </table>
  833. <h2><b>Lakers Player Breakdown: Balanced and Dominant</b></h2>
  834. <p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1311" src="https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-28.webp" alt="Houston Rockets vs Lakers Match Player Stats" width="1200" height="630" srcset="https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-28.webp 1200w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-28-300x158.webp 300w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-28-1024x538.webp 1024w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-28-768x403.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /></p>
  835. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Lakers were organized. Their top players performed well, and the bench added support. Luka Dončić was the standout, scoring 39 points with efficiency. Austin Reaves and LeBron James controlled the pace and moved the ball well.</span></p>
  836. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This balance was key. The team made 60.9% of their shots from the field and 51.4% from beyond the arc. Their defense kept the Rockets under pressure. Each player did their part, contributing either in points, rebounds, or assists.</span></p>
  837. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Here’s a closer look at individual player performances from the Lakers.</span></p>
  838. <h3><b>Los Angeles Lakers Player Stats</b></h3>
  839. <table>
  840. <tbody>
  841. <tr>
  842. <td><b>Player</b></td>
  843. <td><b>Minutes</b></td>
  844. <td><b>Points</b></td>
  845. <td><b>Rebounds</b></td>
  846. <td><b>Assists</b></td>
  847. </tr>
  848. <tr>
  849. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Luka Dončić</span></td>
  850. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">31:07</span></td>
  851. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">39</span></td>
  852. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  853. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  854. </tr>
  855. <tr>
  856. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Austin Reaves</span></td>
  857. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">33:01</span></td>
  858. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23</span></td>
  859. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  860. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  861. </tr>
  862. <tr>
  863. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">LeBron James</span></td>
  864. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">22:07</span></td>
  865. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">14</span></td>
  866. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  867. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  868. </tr>
  869. <tr>
  870. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rui Hachimura</span></td>
  871. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">31:59</span></td>
  872. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">16</span></td>
  873. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  874. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  875. </tr>
  876. <tr>
  877. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Dorian Finney-Smith</span></td>
  878. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">30:09</span></td>
  879. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">18</span></td>
  880. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  881. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  882. </tr>
  883. <tr>
  884. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jaxson Hayes</span></td>
  885. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11:53</span></td>
  886. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  887. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  888. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  889. </tr>
  890. <tr>
  891. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jordan Goodwin</span></td>
  892. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">22:43</span></td>
  893. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  894. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  895. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  896. </tr>
  897. <tr>
  898. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jarred Vanderbilt</span></td>
  899. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">19:01</span></td>
  900. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  901. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  902. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  903. </tr>
  904. <tr>
  905. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bronny James</span></td>
  906. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4:23</span></td>
  907. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  908. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  909. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  910. </tr>
  911. </tbody>
  912. </table>
  913. <h2><b>Houston Rockets vs Lakers Match Player Stats Scoring Leaders: Offense at the Core</b></h2>
  914. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This game had standout scorers. Dončić dominated with deep threes and mid-range jumpers. Cam Whitmore showed skill with drives and spot-up shooting. Reaves and Finney-Smith also chipped in with key buckets at important times.</span></p>
  915. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The scoring shows how much depth and efficiency matter in games. It’s not just who scores, but how and when they score that makes the difference.</span></p>
  916. <h3><b>Top 5 Scorers</b></h3>
  917. <table>
  918. <tbody>
  919. <tr>
  920. <td><b>Team</b></td>
  921. <td><b>Player</b></td>
  922. <td><b>Points</b></td>
  923. </tr>
  924. <tr>
  925. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lakers</span></td>
  926. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Luka Dončić</span></td>
  927. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">39</span></td>
  928. </tr>
  929. <tr>
  930. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lakers</span></td>
  931. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Austin Reaves</span></td>
  932. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23</span></td>
  933. </tr>
  934. <tr>
  935. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rockets</span></td>
  936. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Cam Whitmore</span></td>
  937. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">34</span></td>
  938. </tr>
  939. <tr>
  940. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lakers</span></td>
  941. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Dorian Finney-Smith</span></td>
  942. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">18</span></td>
  943. </tr>
  944. <tr>
  945. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rockets</span></td>
  946. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Reed Sheppard</span></td>
  947. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">14</span></td>
  948. </tr>
  949. </tbody>
  950. </table>
  951. <h2><b>Shooting Accuracy: Key to Victory</b></h2>
  952. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Houston Rockets vs Lakers match player stats make one thing clear. The Lakers were more accurate in all shooting areas. Field goal, three-point, and even free throws saw better conversion from LA.</span></p>
  953. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Houston tried more three-point attempts but missed too many. The Lakers stayed selective and shot with purpose. This reflects good coaching and discipline on offense.</span></p>
  954. <h3><b>Shooting Accuracy Comparison</b></h3>
  955. <table>
  956. <tbody>
  957. <tr>
  958. <td><b>Team</b></td>
  959. <td><b>FG%</b></td>
  960. <td><b>3P%</b></td>
  961. <td><b>FT%</b></td>
  962. </tr>
  963. <tr>
  964. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lakers</span></td>
  965. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">60.9</span></td>
  966. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">51.4</span></td>
  967. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">60.0</span></td>
  968. </tr>
  969. <tr>
  970. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rockets</span></td>
  971. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">45.6</span></td>
  972. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">35.3</span></td>
  973. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">75.0</span></td>
  974. </tr>
  975. </tbody>
  976. </table>
  977. <h2><b>Ball Movement and Assists: The Smart Playmakers</b></h2>
  978. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Assists are a sign of ball movement and teamwork. The Lakers were ahead again. LeBron James and Luka Dončić led with smart passing. Austin Reaves also created good looks with quick decisions.</span></p>
  979. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Houston had moments of good passing. Reed Sheppard and Aaron Holiday were the key passers. Still, it didn’t match the Lakers’ consistent movement.</span></p>
  980. <h3><b>Top Assist Leaders</b></h3>
  981. <table>
  982. <tbody>
  983. <tr>
  984. <td><b>Player</b></td>
  985. <td><b>Team</b></td>
  986. <td><b>Assists</b></td>
  987. </tr>
  988. <tr>
  989. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">LeBron James</span></td>
  990. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lakers</span></td>
  991. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  992. </tr>
  993. <tr>
  994. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Luka Dončić</span></td>
  995. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lakers</span></td>
  996. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  997. </tr>
  998. <tr>
  999. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Austin Reaves</span></td>
  1000. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lakers</span></td>
  1001. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  1002. </tr>
  1003. <tr>
  1004. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Reed Sheppard</span></td>
  1005. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rockets</span></td>
  1006. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  1007. </tr>
  1008. <tr>
  1009. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aaron Holiday</span></td>
  1010. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rockets</span></td>
  1011. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  1012. </tr>
  1013. </tbody>
  1014. </table>
  1015. <h2><b>Rebounding Battles: Defense and Second Chances</b></h2>
  1016. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rebounds decide second chances. The Lakers had more defensive rebounds. This limited Houston’s offensive threats. Houston had more offensive boards but didn’t turn those into points often enough.</span></p>
  1017. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In games like these, defensive rebounding shows control. It’s where the Lakers really dominated and closed each possession.</span></p>
  1018. <h3><b>Rebounding Totals by Team</b></h3>
  1019. <table>
  1020. <tbody>
  1021. <tr>
  1022. <td><b>Team</b></td>
  1023. <td><b>Offensive Rebounds</b></td>
  1024. <td><b>Defensive Rebounds</b></td>
  1025. <td><b>Total Rebounds</b></td>
  1026. </tr>
  1027. <tr>
  1028. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lakers</span></td>
  1029. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  1030. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">38</span></td>
  1031. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">42</span></td>
  1032. </tr>
  1033. <tr>
  1034. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rockets</span></td>
  1035. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  1036. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">30</span></td>
  1037. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">37</span></td>
  1038. </tr>
  1039. </tbody>
  1040. </table>
  1041. <h2><b>Overall Team Comparison</b></h2>
  1042. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">When you compare both teams, the stats show how clearly the Lakers outplayed the Rockets. Higher field goal percentage, better three-point accuracy, and fewer turnovers gave them the win.</span></p>
  1043. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Rockets were not without highlights. Whitmore’s performance proves they have future stars. Still, the overall structure and defense must improve for better results.</span></p>
  1044. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This table gives a final side-by-side comparison of core team stats.</span></p>
  1045. <h3><b>Final Team Comparison</b></h3>
  1046. <table>
  1047. <tbody>
  1048. <tr>
  1049. <td><b>Category</b></td>
  1050. <td><b>Lakers</b></td>
  1051. <td><b>Rockets</b></td>
  1052. </tr>
  1053. <tr>
  1054. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Points</span></td>
  1055. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">140</span></td>
  1056. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">109</span></td>
  1057. </tr>
  1058. <tr>
  1059. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">FG%</span></td>
  1060. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">60.9</span></td>
  1061. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">45.6</span></td>
  1062. </tr>
  1063. <tr>
  1064. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3P%</span></td>
  1065. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">51.4</span></td>
  1066. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">35.3</span></td>
  1067. </tr>
  1068. <tr>
  1069. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rebounds</span></td>
  1070. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">42</span></td>
  1071. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">37</span></td>
  1072. </tr>
  1073. <tr>
  1074. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Assists</span></td>
  1075. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">28</span></td>
  1076. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">22</span></td>
  1077. </tr>
  1078. </tbody>
  1079. </table>
  1080. <h3><b>Conclusion: What This Game Means Going Forward?</b></h3>
  1081. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Houston Rockets vs Lakers match player stats reveal a complete story. The Lakers were efficient, smart, and focused. They deserved the win and earned their No. 3 seed with hard work and coordination.</span></p>
  1082. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Houston has raw talent. But the game showed they need tighter defense and smarter shot selection. With more consistency, they could challenge teams like the Lakers soon.</span></p>
  1083. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">From this match, we get insight into both teams&#8217; futures. For now, the Lakers look ready for a strong playoff run. The Rockets go back to the drawing board—but not without hope.</span></p>
  1084. <p><strong>Read More Blogs:-) </strong><a href="https://cricfevers.com/miami-heat-vs-boston-celtics-match-player-stats/">Miami Heat vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats &amp; Game Analysis</a></p>
  1085. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/houston-rockets-vs-lakers-match-player-stats/">Houston Rockets vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Full Breakdown</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  1086. ]]></content:encoded>
  1087. <wfw:commentRss>https://cricfevers.com/houston-rockets-vs-lakers-match-player-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  1088. <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
  1089. </item>
  1090. <item>
  1091. <title>Bangladesh National Cricket Team vs India National Cricket Team Match Scorecard 2025</title>
  1092. <link>https://cricfevers.com/bangladesh-national-cricket-team-vs-india-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/</link>
  1093. <comments>https://cricfevers.com/bangladesh-national-cricket-team-vs-india-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/#respond</comments>
  1094. <dc:creator><![CDATA[cricfevers cricfevers]]></dc:creator>
  1095. <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 07:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
  1096. <category><![CDATA[Match Matrix]]></category>
  1097. <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cricfevers.com/?p=1301</guid>
  1098.  
  1099. <description><![CDATA[<p>The Champions Trophy 2025 brought intense action. Among the biggest highlights was the bangladesh national cricket team vs india national cricket team match scorecard. Fans waited for this clash. It had drama, class, and power-packed moments. India and Bangladesh share a strong rivalry. Over the years, both teams have improved. But in this match, India [&#8230;]</p>
  1100. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/bangladesh-national-cricket-team-vs-india-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/">Bangladesh National Cricket Team vs India National Cricket Team Match Scorecard 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  1101. ]]></description>
  1102. <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Champions Trophy 2025 brought intense action. Among the biggest highlights was the bangladesh national cricket team vs india national cricket team match scorecard. Fans waited for this clash. It had drama, class, and power-packed moments.</span></p>
  1103. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">India and Bangladesh share a strong rivalry. Over the years, both teams have improved. But in this match, India showed dominance again. The scorecard tells a complete story of control, talent, and big-match nerves.</span></p>
  1104. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This blog will walk you through the match. You’ll find batting stats, fall of wickets, bowling performance, team squads, and game analysis. All with short, clear sentences for better understanding.</span></p>
  1105. <h2><b>Bangladesh National Cricket Team vs India National Cricket Team Match Scorecard Match Setup: Time, Place, and Importance</b></h2>
  1106. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This match was the 2nd Group A game. It was part of the ICC Champions Trophy 2025. The venue was Dubai International Cricket Stadium. A stadium known for turning pitches and slow outfields.</span></p>
  1107. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The match started at 1:00 PM local time. Bangladesh won the toss and decided to bat. That decision didn’t work well for them. India took charge with the ball early on.</span></p>
  1108. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The match was held on February 20, 2025. Fans from both nations watched every moment with hope and pride.</span></p>
  1109. <h2><b>Bangladesh’s Top-Order Collapse</b></h2>
  1110. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bangladesh’s batting lineup failed early. Their top three fell within just two overs. None of them managed to reach even double digits. This hurt their start badly.</span></p>
  1111. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tanzid Hasan tried to hold one end. But wickets kept falling from the other. Towhid Hridoy played a gem of an innings. His century stood out on a tough day.</span></p>
  1112. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Without his 100, Bangladesh would have collapsed under 150. Jaker Ali gave good support. But the rest of the lineup didn’t deliver.</span></p>
  1113. <h3><b>Bangladesh Batting Scorecard</b></h3>
  1114. <table>
  1115. <tbody>
  1116. <tr>
  1117. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Batter</span></td>
  1118. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Runs</span></td>
  1119. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Balls</span></td>
  1120. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4s</span></td>
  1121. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6s</span></td>
  1122. </tr>
  1123. <tr>
  1124. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tanzid Hasan</span></td>
  1125. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">25</span></td>
  1126. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">25</span></td>
  1127. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  1128. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1129. </tr>
  1130. <tr>
  1131. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Soumya Sarkar</span></td>
  1132. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1133. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  1134. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1135. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1136. </tr>
  1137. <tr>
  1138. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Najmul Hossain Shanto</span></td>
  1139. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1140. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1141. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1142. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1143. </tr>
  1144. <tr>
  1145. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mehidy Hasan Miraz</span></td>
  1146. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  1147. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  1148. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1149. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1150. </tr>
  1151. <tr>
  1152. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Towhid Hridoy</span></td>
  1153. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">100</span></td>
  1154. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">118</span></td>
  1155. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  1156. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1157. </tr>
  1158. <tr>
  1159. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mushfiqur Rahim</span></td>
  1160. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1161. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1162. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1163. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1164. </tr>
  1165. <tr>
  1166. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jaker Ali</span></td>
  1167. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">68</span></td>
  1168. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">114</span></td>
  1169. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  1170. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1171. </tr>
  1172. <tr>
  1173. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rishad Hossain</span></td>
  1174. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">18</span></td>
  1175. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12</span></td>
  1176. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1177. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1178. </tr>
  1179. <tr>
  1180. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tanzim Hasan Sakib</span></td>
  1181. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1182. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  1183. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1184. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1185. </tr>
  1186. <tr>
  1187. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Taskin Ahmed</span></td>
  1188. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  1189. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  1190. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1191. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1192. </tr>
  1193. <tr>
  1194. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mustafizur Rahman</span></td>
  1195. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1196. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1197. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1198. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1199. </tr>
  1200. </tbody>
  1201. </table>
  1202. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Extras: 9 (1 lb, 7 w, 1 nb)</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  1203. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Total: 228 all out in 49.4 overs</span></p>
  1204. <h2><b>India&#8217;s Bowling Power Show</b></h2>
  1205. <p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1322" src="https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-26.webp" alt="Bangladesh National Cricket Team vs India National Cricket Team Match Scorecard" width="1200" height="630" srcset="https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-26.webp 1200w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-26-300x158.webp 300w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-26-1024x538.webp 1024w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-26-768x403.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /></p>
  1206. <p>&nbsp;</p>
  1207. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">India bowled tight lines. They were aggressive from ball one. Mohammed Shami was on fire. He picked five wickets and led the attack with pace.</span></p>
  1208. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Harshit Rana took three wickets. He kept the pressure high with short balls and yorkers. Axar Patel chipped in with two crucial wickets. Other bowlers controlled the run rate well.</span></p>
  1209. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This attack proved too strong for Bangladesh’s batters. The bowlers used the pitch well, mixing pace and spin cleverly.</span></p>
  1210. <h3><b>India Bowling Scorecard</b></h3>
  1211. <table>
  1212. <tbody>
  1213. <tr>
  1214. <td><b>Bowler</b></td>
  1215. <td><b>Overs</b></td>
  1216. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  1217. <td><b>Wickets</b></td>
  1218. <td><b>Econ</b></td>
  1219. </tr>
  1220. <tr>
  1221. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mohammed Shami</span></td>
  1222. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  1223. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">53</span></td>
  1224. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  1225. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.30</span></td>
  1226. </tr>
  1227. <tr>
  1228. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Harshit Rana</span></td>
  1229. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.4</span></td>
  1230. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">31</span></td>
  1231. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  1232. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4.00</span></td>
  1233. </tr>
  1234. <tr>
  1235. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Axar Patel</span></td>
  1236. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  1237. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">14</span></td>
  1238. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1239. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1.56</span></td>
  1240. </tr>
  1241. <tr>
  1242. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hardik Pandya</span></td>
  1243. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  1244. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">20</span></td>
  1245. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1246. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.00</span></td>
  1247. </tr>
  1248. <tr>
  1249. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ravindra Jadeja</span></td>
  1250. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  1251. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">37</span></td>
  1252. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1253. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4.11</span></td>
  1254. </tr>
  1255. <tr>
  1256. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kuldeep Yadav</span></td>
  1257. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  1258. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">43</span></td>
  1259. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1260. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4.30</span></td>
  1261. </tr>
  1262. </tbody>
  1263. </table>
  1264. <h2><b>India&#8217;s Confident Chase</b></h2>
  1265. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">India began the chase calmly. Rohit Sharma gave a flying start. He played fast and scored 41 in 36 balls. Gill held the innings together and completed a century.</span></p>
  1266. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Virat Kohli and Shreyas Iyer played small roles. KL Rahul gave the finishing touch. His 41 not out included two sixes and four boundaries.</span></p>
  1267. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">India chased the target in 46.3 overs. The batting looked in full control. There was no panic or pressure.</span></p>
  1268. <h3><b>India Batting Scorecard</b></h3>
  1269. <table>
  1270. <tbody>
  1271. <tr>
  1272. <td><b>Batter</b></td>
  1273. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  1274. <td><b>Balls</b></td>
  1275. <td><b>4s</b></td>
  1276. <td><b>6s</b></td>
  1277. </tr>
  1278. <tr>
  1279. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rohit Sharma</span></td>
  1280. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">41</span></td>
  1281. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">36</span></td>
  1282. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  1283. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1284. </tr>
  1285. <tr>
  1286. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shubman Gill</span></td>
  1287. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">101*</span></td>
  1288. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">129</span></td>
  1289. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  1290. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1291. </tr>
  1292. <tr>
  1293. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Virat Kohli</span></td>
  1294. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">22</span></td>
  1295. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">38</span></td>
  1296. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  1297. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1298. </tr>
  1299. <tr>
  1300. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shreyas Iyer</span></td>
  1301. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">15</span></td>
  1302. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">17</span></td>
  1303. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1304. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1305. </tr>
  1306. <tr>
  1307. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Axar Patel</span></td>
  1308. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  1309. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12</span></td>
  1310. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1311. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1312. </tr>
  1313. <tr>
  1314. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">KL Rahul</span></td>
  1315. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">41*</span></td>
  1316. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">47</span></td>
  1317. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  1318. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1319. </tr>
  1320. </tbody>
  1321. </table>
  1322. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Extras: 3 (3 w)</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  1323. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Total: 231/4 in 46.3 overs</span></p>
  1324. <h2><b>Bangladesh’s Bowling Response</b></h2>
  1325. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bangladesh bowlers struggled to break key stands. Taskin Ahmed and Mustafizur got a wicket each. Rishad Hossain picked two, including Kohli’s big wicket.</span></p>
  1326. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But it wasn’t enough. India batted smart. Bangladesh couldn’t maintain pressure or build dots. India’s batters rotated strike and hit boundaries often.</span></p>
  1327. <h3><b>Bangladesh Bowling Scorecard</b></h3>
  1328. <table>
  1329. <tbody>
  1330. <tr>
  1331. <td><b>Bowler</b></td>
  1332. <td><b>Overs</b></td>
  1333. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  1334. <td><b>Wickets</b></td>
  1335. <td><b>Econ</b></td>
  1336. </tr>
  1337. <tr>
  1338. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Taskin Ahmed</span></td>
  1339. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  1340. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">36</span></td>
  1341. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1342. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4.00</span></td>
  1343. </tr>
  1344. <tr>
  1345. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mustafizur Rahman</span></td>
  1346. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  1347. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">62</span></td>
  1348. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1349. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.89</span></td>
  1350. </tr>
  1351. <tr>
  1352. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tanzim Hasan Sakib</span></td>
  1353. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8.3</span></td>
  1354. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">58</span></td>
  1355. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1356. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.80</span></td>
  1357. </tr>
  1358. <tr>
  1359. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mehidy Hasan Miraz</span></td>
  1360. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  1361. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">37</span></td>
  1362. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1363. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3.70</span></td>
  1364. </tr>
  1365. <tr>
  1366. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rishad Hossain</span></td>
  1367. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  1368. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">38</span></td>
  1369. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1370. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3.80</span></td>
  1371. </tr>
  1372. </tbody>
  1373. </table>
  1374. <h2><b>Fall of Wickets: When It Happened?</b></h2>
  1375. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Wickets change games. Early losses put pressure on Bangladesh. India, on the other hand, lost few and stayed strong. Here&#8217;s how each side lost their wickets.</span></p>
  1376. <h3><b>Bangladesh – Fall of Wickets</b></h3>
  1377. <table>
  1378. <tbody>
  1379. <tr>
  1380. <td><b>Fall</b></td>
  1381. <td><b>Score</b></td>
  1382. <td><b>Batter</b></td>
  1383. </tr>
  1384. <tr>
  1385. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1386. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1387. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Soumya Sarkar</span></td>
  1388. </tr>
  1389. <tr>
  1390. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1391. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1392. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shanto</span></td>
  1393. </tr>
  1394. <tr>
  1395. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  1396. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">26</span></td>
  1397. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mehidy Hasan Miraz</span></td>
  1398. </tr>
  1399. <tr>
  1400. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  1401. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">35</span></td>
  1402. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tanzid Hasan</span></td>
  1403. </tr>
  1404. <tr>
  1405. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  1406. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">35</span></td>
  1407. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mushfiqur Rahim</span></td>
  1408. </tr>
  1409. <tr>
  1410. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  1411. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">189</span></td>
  1412. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jaker Ali</span></td>
  1413. </tr>
  1414. <tr>
  1415. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  1416. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">214</span></td>
  1417. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rishad Hossain</span></td>
  1418. </tr>
  1419. <tr>
  1420. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  1421. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">215</span></td>
  1422. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tanzim Hasan Sakib</span></td>
  1423. </tr>
  1424. <tr>
  1425. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  1426. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">228</span></td>
  1427. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Taskin Ahmed</span></td>
  1428. </tr>
  1429. <tr>
  1430. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  1431. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">228</span></td>
  1432. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Towhid Hridoy</span></td>
  1433. </tr>
  1434. </tbody>
  1435. </table>
  1436. <h3><b>India – Fall of Wickets</b></h3>
  1437. <table>
  1438. <tbody>
  1439. <tr>
  1440. <td><b>Fall</b></td>
  1441. <td><b>Score</b></td>
  1442. <td><b>Batter</b></td>
  1443. </tr>
  1444. <tr>
  1445. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1446. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">69</span></td>
  1447. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rohit Sharma</span></td>
  1448. </tr>
  1449. <tr>
  1450. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1451. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">112</span></td>
  1452. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Virat Kohli</span></td>
  1453. </tr>
  1454. <tr>
  1455. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  1456. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">133</span></td>
  1457. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shreyas Iyer</span></td>
  1458. </tr>
  1459. <tr>
  1460. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  1461. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">144</span></td>
  1462. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Axar Patel</span></td>
  1463. </tr>
  1464. </tbody>
  1465. </table>
  1466. <h2><b>Match Summary Table</b></h2>
  1467. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Here’s a quick match wrap-up in table form. This helps you understand everything at a glance.</span></p>
  1468. <table>
  1469. <tbody>
  1470. <tr>
  1471. <td><b>Detail</b></td>
  1472. <td><b>Info</b></td>
  1473. </tr>
  1474. <tr>
  1475. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Match</span></td>
  1476. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">ICC Champions Trophy 2025 – Group A</span></td>
  1477. </tr>
  1478. <tr>
  1479. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Date</span></td>
  1480. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">February 20, 2025</span></td>
  1481. </tr>
  1482. <tr>
  1483. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Venue</span></td>
  1484. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Dubai International Cricket Stadium</span></td>
  1485. </tr>
  1486. <tr>
  1487. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Result</span></td>
  1488. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">India won by 6 wickets</span></td>
  1489. </tr>
  1490. <tr>
  1491. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Toss Winner</span></td>
  1492. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bangladesh (elected to bat)</span></td>
  1493. </tr>
  1494. <tr>
  1495. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Player of the Match</span></td>
  1496. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shubman Gill</span></td>
  1497. </tr>
  1498. </tbody>
  1499. </table>
  1500. <h2><b>Squad Info – Who Played?</b></h2>
  1501. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Both teams had strong squads. Here are the playing XIs:</span></p>
  1502. <h3><b>Bangladesh Playing XI</b></h3>
  1503. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tanzid Hasan, Soumya Sarkar, Najmul Hossain Shanto (C), Towhid Hridoy, Mushfiqur Rahim (WK), Mehidy Hasan Miraz, Jaker Ali, Rishad Hossain, Tanzim Hasan Sakib, Taskin Ahmed, Mustafizur Rahman</span></p>
  1504. <h3><b>India Playing XI</b></h3>
  1505. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rohit Sharma (C), Shubman Gill, Virat Kohli, Shreyas Iyer, KL Rahul (WK), Hardik Pandya, Axar Patel, Ravindra Jadeja, Harshit Rana, Mohammed Shami, Kuldeep Yadav</span></p>
  1506. <h2><b>Key Takeaways from the Match</b></h2>
  1507. <ul>
  1508. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">India’s bowling was top-notch.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  1509. </span></li>
  1510. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bangladesh’s top order failed badly.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  1511. </span></li>
  1512. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Towhid Hridoy’s hundred was brilliant.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  1513. </span></li>
  1514. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shubman Gill’s unbeaten century was class.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  1515. </span></li>
  1516. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">KL Rahul provided a mature finish.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  1517. </span></li>
  1518. </ul>
  1519. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This bangladesh national cricket team vs india national cricket team match scorecard shows why India remains a top team.</span></p>
  1520. <h3><b>Conclusion</b></h3>
  1521. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The match was a show of power and patience. India outclassed Bangladesh in every area. From Shami’s five-for to Gill’s steady century, everything clicked.</span></p>
  1522. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bangladesh will need to fix their top order. India will carry this momentum forward. The bangladesh national cricket team vs india national cricket team match scorecard reflects more than numbers. It tells a story of calm, control, and class.</span></p>
  1523. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Let me know if you’d like this turned into a downloadable PDF or formatted for WordPress/blog use.</span></p>
  1524. <p><strong>Read More Blogs:-) </strong><a title="Permalink to: India National Cricket Team vs Pakistan National Cricket Team Match Scorecard: Full Recap" href="https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-pakistan-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">India National Cricket Team vs Pakistan National Cricket Team Match Scorecard: Full Recap</a></p>
  1525. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/bangladesh-national-cricket-team-vs-india-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/">Bangladesh National Cricket Team vs India National Cricket Team Match Scorecard 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  1526. ]]></content:encoded>
  1527. <wfw:commentRss>https://cricfevers.com/bangladesh-national-cricket-team-vs-india-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  1528. <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
  1529. </item>
  1530. <item>
  1531. <title>India National Cricket Team vs Pakistan National Cricket Team Match Scorecard: Full Recap</title>
  1532. <link>https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-pakistan-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/</link>
  1533. <comments>https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-pakistan-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/#respond</comments>
  1534. <dc:creator><![CDATA[cricfevers cricfevers]]></dc:creator>
  1535. <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 06:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
  1536. <category><![CDATA[Match Matrix]]></category>
  1537. <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cricfevers.com/?p=1285</guid>
  1538.  
  1539. <description><![CDATA[<p>India vs Pakistan. The most heated rivalry in cricket. Every fan worldwide watches this match. When the two teams clashed in the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy, expectations were sky-high. This match had intensity, skill, and pure entertainment. The india national cricket team vs pakistan national cricket team match scorecard showed a dominating Indian win. Held [&#8230;]</p>
  1540. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-pakistan-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/">India National Cricket Team vs Pakistan National Cricket Team Match Scorecard: Full Recap</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  1541. ]]></description>
  1542. <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">India vs Pakistan. The most heated rivalry in cricket. Every fan worldwide watches this match. When the two teams clashed in the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy, expectations were sky-high. This match had intensity, skill, and pure entertainment. The india national cricket team vs pakistan national cricket team match scorecard showed a dominating Indian win. Held in Dubai on February 23, 2025, India chased down 242 with confidence. They won by 6 wickets and 45 balls left. Virat Kohli starred again. His unbeaten century silenced Pakistan’s bowlers.</span></p>
  1543. <h2><b>Pakistan’s Start: Promise That Faded Fast</b></h2>
  1544. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pakistan elected to bat after winning the toss. Their opening pair tried to build a base. But early dismissals put pressure on the middle order. Saud Shakeel and Mohammad Rizwan steadied the innings. Yet, they couldn’t accelerate later.</span></p>
  1545. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Here’s a look at how each Pakistani batter performed during the first innings.</span></p>
  1546. <h3><b>Pakistan Batting Performance</b></h3>
  1547. <table>
  1548. <tbody>
  1549. <tr>
  1550. <td><b>Batsman</b></td>
  1551. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  1552. <td><b>Balls</b></td>
  1553. <td><b>SR</b></td>
  1554. </tr>
  1555. <tr>
  1556. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Imam-ul-Haq</span></td>
  1557. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  1558. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">26</span></td>
  1559. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">38.46</span></td>
  1560. </tr>
  1561. <tr>
  1562. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Babar Azam</span></td>
  1563. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23</span></td>
  1564. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">26</span></td>
  1565. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">88.46</span></td>
  1566. </tr>
  1567. <tr>
  1568. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Saud Shakeel</span></td>
  1569. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">62</span></td>
  1570. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">76</span></td>
  1571. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">81.57</span></td>
  1572. </tr>
  1573. <tr>
  1574. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mohammad Rizwan</span></td>
  1575. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">46</span></td>
  1576. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">77</span></td>
  1577. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">59.74</span></td>
  1578. </tr>
  1579. <tr>
  1580. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Salman Agha</span></td>
  1581. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">19</span></td>
  1582. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">24</span></td>
  1583. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">79.16</span></td>
  1584. </tr>
  1585. <tr>
  1586. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tayyab Tahir</span></td>
  1587. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  1588. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  1589. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">66.66</span></td>
  1590. </tr>
  1591. <tr>
  1592. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Khushdil Shah</span></td>
  1593. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">38</span></td>
  1594. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">39</span></td>
  1595. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">97.43</span></td>
  1596. </tr>
  1597. <tr>
  1598. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shaheen Afridi</span></td>
  1599. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1600. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1601. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.00</span></td>
  1602. </tr>
  1603. <tr>
  1604. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Naseem Shah</span></td>
  1605. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">14</span></td>
  1606. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">16</span></td>
  1607. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">87.50</span></td>
  1608. </tr>
  1609. <tr>
  1610. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Haris Rauf</span></td>
  1611. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  1612. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  1613. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">114.28</span></td>
  1614. </tr>
  1615. <tr>
  1616. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Abrar Ahmed</span></td>
  1617. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1618. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1619. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.00</span></td>
  1620. </tr>
  1621. </tbody>
  1622. </table>
  1623. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The middle order tried reviving the innings, but India’s bowlers took timely wickets. Pakistan was all out for 241 in 49.4 overs.</span></p>
  1624. <h2><b>India’s Chase: Calm, Confident, and Commanding</b></h2>
  1625. <p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1289" src="https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-25.webp" alt="India National Cricket Team vs Pakistan National Cricket Team Match Scorecard" width="1200" height="630" srcset="https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-25.webp 1200w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-25-300x158.webp 300w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-25-1024x538.webp 1024w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-25-768x403.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /></p>
  1626. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">India began the chase with confidence. Rohit Sharma gave a quick start. Then came the stability—Shubman Gill played a controlled knock. But it was Virat Kohli’s innings that anchored the chase beautifully. His 100* was classy and match-winning.</span></p>
  1627. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Here is how India’s top batters fared during the chase.</span></p>
  1628. <h3><b>India Batting Performance</b></h3>
  1629. <table>
  1630. <tbody>
  1631. <tr>
  1632. <td><b>Batsman</b></td>
  1633. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  1634. <td><b>Balls</b></td>
  1635. <td><b>SR</b></td>
  1636. </tr>
  1637. <tr>
  1638. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rohit Sharma</span></td>
  1639. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">20</span></td>
  1640. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">15</span></td>
  1641. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">133.33</span></td>
  1642. </tr>
  1643. <tr>
  1644. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shubman Gill</span></td>
  1645. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">46</span></td>
  1646. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">52</span></td>
  1647. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">88.46</span></td>
  1648. </tr>
  1649. <tr>
  1650. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Virat Kohli</span></td>
  1651. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">100</span></td>
  1652. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">111</span></td>
  1653. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">90.09</span></td>
  1654. </tr>
  1655. <tr>
  1656. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shreyas Iyer</span></td>
  1657. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">56</span></td>
  1658. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">67</span></td>
  1659. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">83.58</span></td>
  1660. </tr>
  1661. <tr>
  1662. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hardik Pandya</span></td>
  1663. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  1664. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  1665. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">133.33</span></td>
  1666. </tr>
  1667. <tr>
  1668. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Axar Patel</span></td>
  1669. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  1670. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  1671. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">75.00</span></td>
  1672. </tr>
  1673. </tbody>
  1674. </table>
  1675. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">India reached 244/4 in just 42.3 overs. The victory was smooth and commanding. This match boosted India’s momentum in the tournament.</span></p>
  1676. <h2><b>Head-to-Head Batting: Who Outperformed?</b></h2>
  1677. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Comparing players from both teams gives a clear picture. Pakistan’s strike rates were slower. India rotated strike better and struck boundaries with ease.</span></p>
  1678. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Below is a side-by-side batting comparison of both teams in the india national cricket team vs pakistan national cricket team match scorecard.</span></p>
  1679. <h3><b>India vs Pakistan Top Batsmen Comparison</b></h3>
  1680. <table>
  1681. <tbody>
  1682. <tr>
  1683. <td><b>Batsman (PAK)</b></td>
  1684. <td><b>Runs (PAK)</b></td>
  1685. <td><b>Balls (PAK)</b></td>
  1686. <td><b>SR (PAK)</b></td>
  1687. <td><b>Batsman (IND)</b></td>
  1688. <td><b>Runs (IND)</b></td>
  1689. <td><b>Balls (IND)</b></td>
  1690. <td><b>SR (IND)</b></td>
  1691. </tr>
  1692. <tr>
  1693. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Imam-ul-Haq</span></td>
  1694. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  1695. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">26</span></td>
  1696. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">38.46</span></td>
  1697. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rohit Sharma</span></td>
  1698. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">20</span></td>
  1699. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">15</span></td>
  1700. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">133.33</span></td>
  1701. </tr>
  1702. <tr>
  1703. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Babar Azam</span></td>
  1704. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23</span></td>
  1705. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">26</span></td>
  1706. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">88.46</span></td>
  1707. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shubman Gill</span></td>
  1708. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">46</span></td>
  1709. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">52</span></td>
  1710. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">88.46</span></td>
  1711. </tr>
  1712. <tr>
  1713. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Saud Shakeel</span></td>
  1714. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">62</span></td>
  1715. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">76</span></td>
  1716. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">81.57</span></td>
  1717. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Virat Kohli</span></td>
  1718. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">100</span></td>
  1719. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">111</span></td>
  1720. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">90.09</span></td>
  1721. </tr>
  1722. <tr>
  1723. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mohammad Rizwan</span></td>
  1724. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">46</span></td>
  1725. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">77</span></td>
  1726. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">59.74</span></td>
  1727. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shreyas Iyer</span></td>
  1728. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">56</span></td>
  1729. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">67</span></td>
  1730. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">83.58</span></td>
  1731. </tr>
  1732. <tr>
  1733. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Salman Agha</span></td>
  1734. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">19</span></td>
  1735. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">24</span></td>
  1736. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">79.16</span></td>
  1737. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hardik Pandya</span></td>
  1738. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  1739. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  1740. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">133.33</span></td>
  1741. </tr>
  1742. </tbody>
  1743. </table>
  1744. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This table highlights how India’s better strike rates and partnerships made the difference.</span></p>
  1745. <h2><b>Bowling Battle: Indian Spin Dominates</b></h2>
  1746. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">India’s bowling was sharp and disciplined. Kuldeep Yadav picked key wickets. Pandya and Jadeja supported well. Pakistan couldn’t find boundaries often.</span></p>
  1747. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Let’s check the bowling stats for India.</span></p>
  1748. <h3><b>Indian Bowling Figures</b></h3>
  1749. <table>
  1750. <tbody>
  1751. <tr>
  1752. <td><b>Bowler</b></td>
  1753. <td><b>Overs</b></td>
  1754. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  1755. <td><b>Wickets</b></td>
  1756. <td><b>Economy</b></td>
  1757. </tr>
  1758. <tr>
  1759. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mohammed Shami</span></td>
  1760. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  1761. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">43</span></td>
  1762. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1763. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.37</span></td>
  1764. </tr>
  1765. <tr>
  1766. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Harshit Rana</span></td>
  1767. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.4</span></td>
  1768. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">30</span></td>
  1769. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1770. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3.91</span></td>
  1771. </tr>
  1772. <tr>
  1773. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hardik Pandya</span></td>
  1774. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  1775. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">31</span></td>
  1776. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1777. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3.87</span></td>
  1778. </tr>
  1779. <tr>
  1780. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Axar Patel</span></td>
  1781. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  1782. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">49</span></td>
  1783. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1784. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4.90</span></td>
  1785. </tr>
  1786. <tr>
  1787. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kuldeep Yadav</span></td>
  1788. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  1789. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">40</span></td>
  1790. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  1791. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4.44</span></td>
  1792. </tr>
  1793. <tr>
  1794. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ravindra Jadeja</span></td>
  1795. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  1796. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">40</span></td>
  1797. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1798. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.71</span></td>
  1799. </tr>
  1800. </tbody>
  1801. </table>
  1802. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kuldeep Yadav&#8217;s variations kept batters guessing. He was India&#8217;s best bowler in this match.</span></p>
  1803. <h2><b>Pakistan’s Bowling: Inconsistent Under Pressure</b></h2>
  1804. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pakistan struggled with the ball. Shaheen Afridi got wickets but leaked runs. Spinners failed to contain the run rate. The Indian batters dominated the innings with patience.</span></p>
  1805. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">See the bowling figures for Pakistan below.</span></p>
  1806. <h3><b>Pakistan Bowling Figures</b></h3>
  1807. <table>
  1808. <tbody>
  1809. <tr>
  1810. <td><b>Bowler</b></td>
  1811. <td><b>Overs</b></td>
  1812. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  1813. <td><b>Wickets</b></td>
  1814. <td><b>Economy</b></td>
  1815. </tr>
  1816. <tr>
  1817. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shaheen Afridi</span></td>
  1818. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  1819. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">74</span></td>
  1820. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1821. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9.25</span></td>
  1822. </tr>
  1823. <tr>
  1824. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Naseem Shah</span></td>
  1825. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  1826. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">37</span></td>
  1827. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1828. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4.62</span></td>
  1829. </tr>
  1830. <tr>
  1831. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Haris Rauf</span></td>
  1832. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  1833. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">52</span></td>
  1834. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1835. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.42</span></td>
  1836. </tr>
  1837. <tr>
  1838. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Abrar Ahmed</span></td>
  1839. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  1840. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">28</span></td>
  1841. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1842. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2.80</span></td>
  1843. </tr>
  1844. <tr>
  1845. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Khushdil Shah</span></td>
  1846. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.3</span></td>
  1847. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">43</span></td>
  1848. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1849. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.73</span></td>
  1850. </tr>
  1851. <tr>
  1852. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Salman Agha</span></td>
  1853. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1854. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  1855. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1856. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.00</span></td>
  1857. </tr>
  1858. </tbody>
  1859. </table>
  1860. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The numbers show how poorly <a href="https://www.espn.in/cricket/story/_/id/35017205/men-t20-world-cup-final-stephen-fleming-pakistan-made-massive-mistake-death-overs" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Pakistan bowled in the death overs</a>. They failed to create pressure.</span></p>
  1861. <h2><b>Virat Kohli: The Undisputed Star</b></h2>
  1862. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Virat Kohli was named Player of the Match. His 100 not out was special. He played the anchor’s role perfectly. He hit 7 boundaries and showed his trademark chase-master class.</span></p>
  1863. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This knock pushed India to a comfortable win. It also pushed him up the ICC rankings. Now, he’s ranked 5th in ODIs globally.</span></p>
  1864. <h2><b>Quick Match Snapshot</b></h2>
  1865. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">For those looking for a quick view of the india national cricket team vs pakistan national cricket team match scorecard, here’s a summarized table.</span></p>
  1866. <h3><b>Match Summary</b></h3>
  1867. <table>
  1868. <tbody>
  1869. <tr>
  1870. <td><b>Detail</b></td>
  1871. <td><b>Info</b></td>
  1872. </tr>
  1873. <tr>
  1874. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Match</span></td>
  1875. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">IND vs PAK, Champions Trophy</span></td>
  1876. </tr>
  1877. <tr>
  1878. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Date</span></td>
  1879. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23 Feb 2025</span></td>
  1880. </tr>
  1881. <tr>
  1882. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Venue</span></td>
  1883. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Dubai International Stadium</span></td>
  1884. </tr>
  1885. <tr>
  1886. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Toss</span></td>
  1887. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pakistan (bat first)</span></td>
  1888. </tr>
  1889. <tr>
  1890. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pakistan Innings</span></td>
  1891. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">241 all out (49.4 ov)</span></td>
  1892. </tr>
  1893. <tr>
  1894. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">India Innings</span></td>
  1895. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">244/4 (42.3 ov)</span></td>
  1896. </tr>
  1897. <tr>
  1898. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Winner</span></td>
  1899. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">India by 6 wickets</span></td>
  1900. </tr>
  1901. <tr>
  1902. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Player of the Match</span></td>
  1903. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Virat Kohli</span></td>
  1904. </tr>
  1905. </tbody>
  1906. </table>
  1907. <h3><b>Final Thoughts on the Clash</b></h3>
  1908. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The India national cricket team vs pakistan national cricket team match scorecard proves India’s dominance. From bowling to batting, they controlled every phase. Kohli’s century will be remembered for its timing and grace. Kuldeep’s bowling tightened the grip.</span></p>
  1909. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pakistan showed glimpses of form. But lack of strike rotation and inconsistent bowling hurt them. India now looks well set to top the group. For Pakistan, it’s back to the drawing board.</span></p>
  1910. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This match had passion, performances, and high drama—just what every cricket fan hopes for in an India vs Pakistan classic.</span></p>
  1911. <p><strong>Read More Blogs:-) </strong><a title="Permalink to: India National Cricket Team vs South Africa National Cricket Team Match Scorecard" href="https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-south-africa-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">India National Cricket Team vs South Africa National Cricket Team Match Scorecard</a></p>
  1912. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-pakistan-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/">India National Cricket Team vs Pakistan National Cricket Team Match Scorecard: Full Recap</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  1913. ]]></content:encoded>
  1914. <wfw:commentRss>https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-pakistan-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  1915. <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
  1916. </item>
  1917. <item>
  1918. <title>India National Cricket Team vs South Africa National Cricket Team Match Scorecard</title>
  1919. <link>https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-south-africa-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/</link>
  1920. <comments>https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-south-africa-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/#respond</comments>
  1921. <dc:creator><![CDATA[cricfevers cricfevers]]></dc:creator>
  1922. <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
  1923. <category><![CDATA[Match Matrix]]></category>
  1924. <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cricfevers.com/?p=1270</guid>
  1925.  
  1926. <description><![CDATA[<p>The clash between the India national cricket team and the South Africa national cricket team in Cape Town was as much of a cricketing rollercoaster as it could get. This fast, smart Test match took only two days to deliver drama, collapse, recovery plus celebration into one spicing combo. The world loved the live stream [&#8230;]</p>
  1927. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-south-africa-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/">India National Cricket Team vs South Africa National Cricket Team Match Scorecard</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  1928. ]]></description>
  1929. <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The clash between the India national cricket team and the South Africa national cricket team in Cape Town was as much of a cricketing rollercoaster as it could get. This fast, smart Test match took only two days to deliver drama, collapse, recovery plus celebration into one spicing combo. The world loved the live stream and cricketers all over the world cheered as the bowlers sought possession of the ball and the batsmen scrambled to score a run. The india national cricket team vs south africa national cricket team match scorecard tells a story of precision, pace, and a dominant Indian victory.</span></p>
  1930. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">India’s dominance stemmed from an inspired pace attack, which dismantled South Africa’s batting in both innings. On the other side, South African opener Aiden Markram offered a fighting hundred, providing some resistance. Let’s revisit this match inning-by-inning and examine the numbers that defined it.</span></p>
  1931. <h2><b>South Africa’s First Innings Breakdown</b></h2>
  1932. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The match began with South Africa opting to bat. However, the decision backfired badly as the Indian pace attack unleashed havoc. Siraj, in particular, was unplayable, swinging the ball both ways with sharp bounce. Within 24 overs, the entire South African team was back in the pavilion for just 55 runs.</span></p>
  1933. <h3><b>South Africa 1st Innings Scorecard</b></h3>
  1934. <table>
  1935. <tbody>
  1936. <tr>
  1937. <td><b>Batter</b></td>
  1938. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  1939. <td><b>Balls</b></td>
  1940. <td><b>4s</b></td>
  1941. <td><b>6s</b></td>
  1942. <td><b>SR</b></td>
  1943. </tr>
  1944. <tr>
  1945. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">A. Markram</span></td>
  1946. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1947. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  1948. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1949. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1950. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">20.00</span></td>
  1951. </tr>
  1952. <tr>
  1953. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">D. Elgar (c)</span></td>
  1954. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  1955. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">15</span></td>
  1956. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1957. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1958. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">26.67</span></td>
  1959. </tr>
  1960. <tr>
  1961. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">T. de Zorzi</span></td>
  1962. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1963. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">17</span></td>
  1964. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1965. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1966. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11.76</span></td>
  1967. </tr>
  1968. <tr>
  1969. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">T. Stubbs</span></td>
  1970. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  1971. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></td>
  1972. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1973. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1974. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">27.27</span></td>
  1975. </tr>
  1976. <tr>
  1977. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">D. Bedingham</span></td>
  1978. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12</span></td>
  1979. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">17</span></td>
  1980. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  1981. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1982. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">70.59</span></td>
  1983. </tr>
  1984. <tr>
  1985. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">K. Verreynne (wk)</span></td>
  1986. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">15</span></td>
  1987. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">30</span></td>
  1988. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  1989. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1990. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">50.00</span></td>
  1991. </tr>
  1992. <tr>
  1993. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">M. Jansen</span></td>
  1994. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1995. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  1996. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1997. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  1998. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.00</span></td>
  1999. </tr>
  2000. <tr>
  2001. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">K. Maharaj</span></td>
  2002. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  2003. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">13</span></td>
  2004. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2005. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2006. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23.08</span></td>
  2007. </tr>
  2008. <tr>
  2009. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">K. Rabada</span></td>
  2010. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  2011. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">13</span></td>
  2012. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2013. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2014. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">38.46</span></td>
  2015. </tr>
  2016. <tr>
  2017. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">N. Burger</span></td>
  2018. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  2019. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></td>
  2020. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2021. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2022. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">36.36</span></td>
  2023. </tr>
  2024. <tr>
  2025. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">L. Ngidi</span></td>
  2026. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0*</span></td>
  2027. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2028. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2029. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2030. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2031. </tr>
  2032. <tr>
  2033. <td><b>Extras</b></td>
  2034. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  2035. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2036. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2037. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2038. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2039. </tr>
  2040. <tr>
  2041. <td><b>Total</b></td>
  2042. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">55</span></td>
  2043. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23.2</span></td>
  2044. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2045. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2046. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2047. </tr>
  2048. </tbody>
  2049. </table>
  2050. <h2><b>Indian Bowling Firepower</b></h2>
  2051. <p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1272" src="https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-24.webp" alt="India National Cricket Team vs South Africa National Cricket Team Match Scorecard" width="1200" height="630" srcset="https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-24.webp 1200w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-24-300x158.webp 300w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-24-1024x538.webp 1024w, https://cricfevers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunrisers-Hyderabad-vs-Rajasthan-Royals-Match-Scorecard-–-A-Record-Breaking-Run-Fest-in-IPL-2025-24-768x403.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /></p>
  2052. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">India’s bowling was clinical. Mohammed Siraj took six wickets with ruthless accuracy, dismissing top and middle-order batters. Bumrah and Mukesh Kumar chipped in at key moments, sealing the innings with tight lines and sharp deliveries. South Africa had no answers.</span></p>
  2053. <h3><b>Indian Bowling Figures – SA 1st Innings</b></h3>
  2054. <table>
  2055. <tbody>
  2056. <tr>
  2057. <td><b>Bowler</b></td>
  2058. <td><b>Overs</b></td>
  2059. <td><b>Maidens</b></td>
  2060. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2061. <td><b>Wickets</b></td>
  2062. <td><b>Economy</b></td>
  2063. </tr>
  2064. <tr>
  2065. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">M. Siraj</span></td>
  2066. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  2067. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  2068. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">15</span></td>
  2069. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  2070. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1.70</span></td>
  2071. </tr>
  2072. <tr>
  2073. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">J. Bumrah</span></td>
  2074. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  2075. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2076. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">22</span></td>
  2077. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2078. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3.10</span></td>
  2079. </tr>
  2080. <tr>
  2081. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">M. Kumar</span></td>
  2082. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2.2</span></td>
  2083. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2084. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2085. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2086. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.85</span></td>
  2087. </tr>
  2088. <tr>
  2089. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">P. Krishna</span></td>
  2090. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  2091. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2092. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  2093. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2094. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2.50</span></td>
  2095. </tr>
  2096. </tbody>
  2097. </table>
  2098. <h2><b>India’s First Innings: Solid Reply</b></h2>
  2099. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">India made a strong statement with the bat. Rohit Sharma looked confident as he played a captain’s knock, while Virat Kohli provided the class and timing needed in the middle order. Though the tail collapsed quickly, the score of 153 was more than enough to pressure South Africa.</span></p>
  2100. <h3><b>India 1st Innings Scorecard</b></h3>
  2101. <table>
  2102. <tbody>
  2103. <tr>
  2104. <td><b>Batter</b></td>
  2105. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2106. <td><b>Balls</b></td>
  2107. <td><b>4s</b></td>
  2108. <td><b>6s</b></td>
  2109. <td><b>SR</b></td>
  2110. </tr>
  2111. <tr>
  2112. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Y. Jaiswal</span></td>
  2113. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2114. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  2115. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2116. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2117. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.00</span></td>
  2118. </tr>
  2119. <tr>
  2120. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">R. Sharma (c)</span></td>
  2121. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">39</span></td>
  2122. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">50</span></td>
  2123. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  2124. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2125. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">78.00</span></td>
  2126. </tr>
  2127. <tr>
  2128. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">S. Gill</span></td>
  2129. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">36</span></td>
  2130. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">55</span></td>
  2131. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  2132. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2133. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">65.45</span></td>
  2134. </tr>
  2135. <tr>
  2136. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">V. Kohli</span></td>
  2137. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">46</span></td>
  2138. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">59</span></td>
  2139. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  2140. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2141. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">77.97</span></td>
  2142. </tr>
  2143. <tr>
  2144. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">S. Iyer</span></td>
  2145. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2146. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2147. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2148. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2149. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.00</span></td>
  2150. </tr>
  2151. <tr>
  2152. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">K. Rahul (wk)</span></td>
  2153. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  2154. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">33</span></td>
  2155. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2156. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2157. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">24.24</span></td>
  2158. </tr>
  2159. <tr>
  2160. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">R. Jadeja</span></td>
  2161. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2162. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2163. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2164. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2165. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.00</span></td>
  2166. </tr>
  2167. <tr>
  2168. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">J. Bumrah</span></td>
  2169. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2170. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2171. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2172. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2173. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.00</span></td>
  2174. </tr>
  2175. <tr>
  2176. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">M. Siraj</span></td>
  2177. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2178. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2179. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2180. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2181. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.00</span></td>
  2182. </tr>
  2183. <tr>
  2184. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">P. Krishna</span></td>
  2185. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2186. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  2187. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2188. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2189. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.00</span></td>
  2190. </tr>
  2191. <tr>
  2192. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">M. Kumar</span></td>
  2193. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0*</span></td>
  2194. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2195. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2196. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2197. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2198. </tr>
  2199. <tr>
  2200. <td><b>Extras</b></td>
  2201. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">24</span></td>
  2202. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2203. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2204. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2205. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2206. </tr>
  2207. <tr>
  2208. <td><b>Total</b></td>
  2209. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">153</span></td>
  2210. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">34.5</span></td>
  2211. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2212. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2213. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2214. </tr>
  2215. </tbody>
  2216. </table>
  2217. <h2><b>Markram’s Lone Stand in Second Innings</b></h2>
  2218. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Markram showed determination and confidence in South Africa’s second innings. His counter-attacking century came at a quick pace and frustrated Indian bowlers. Unfortunately, the rest of the batting lineup failed to support him effectively, and the team ended with a total of 176.</span></p>
  2219. <h3><b>South Africa 2nd Innings Scorecard</b></h3>
  2220. <table>
  2221. <tbody>
  2222. <tr>
  2223. <td><b>Batter</b></td>
  2224. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2225. <td><b>Balls</b></td>
  2226. <td><b>4s</b></td>
  2227. <td><b>6s</b></td>
  2228. <td><b>SR</b></td>
  2229. </tr>
  2230. <tr>
  2231. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">A. Markram</span></td>
  2232. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">106</span></td>
  2233. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">103</span></td>
  2234. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">17</span></td>
  2235. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2236. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">102.91</span></td>
  2237. </tr>
  2238. <tr>
  2239. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">D. Elgar (c)</span></td>
  2240. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12</span></td>
  2241. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">28</span></td>
  2242. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2243. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2244. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">42.86</span></td>
  2245. </tr>
  2246. <tr>
  2247. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">T. de Zorzi</span></td>
  2248. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2249. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  2250. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2251. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2252. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">14.29</span></td>
  2253. </tr>
  2254. <tr>
  2255. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">T. Stubbs</span></td>
  2256. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2257. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">14</span></td>
  2258. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2259. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2260. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.14</span></td>
  2261. </tr>
  2262. <tr>
  2263. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">D. Bedingham</span></td>
  2264. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></td>
  2265. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12</span></td>
  2266. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2267. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2268. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">91.67</span></td>
  2269. </tr>
  2270. <tr>
  2271. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">K. Verreynne (wk)</span></td>
  2272. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  2273. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  2274. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2275. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2276. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">128.57</span></td>
  2277. </tr>
  2278. <tr>
  2279. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">M. Jansen</span></td>
  2280. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></td>
  2281. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  2282. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2283. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2284. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">122.22</span></td>
  2285. </tr>
  2286. <tr>
  2287. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">K. Maharaj</span></td>
  2288. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  2289. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  2290. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2291. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2292. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">75.00</span></td>
  2293. </tr>
  2294. <tr>
  2295. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">K. Rabada</span></td>
  2296. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2297. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12</span></td>
  2298. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2299. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2300. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">16.67</span></td>
  2301. </tr>
  2302. <tr>
  2303. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">N. Burger</span></td>
  2304. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6*</span></td>
  2305. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">20</span></td>
  2306. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2307. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2308. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">30.00</span></td>
  2309. </tr>
  2310. <tr>
  2311. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">L. Ngidi</span></td>
  2312. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  2313. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  2314. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2315. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2316. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">80.00</span></td>
  2317. </tr>
  2318. <tr>
  2319. <td><b>Extras</b></td>
  2320. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  2321. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2322. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2323. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2324. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2325. </tr>
  2326. <tr>
  2327. <td><b>Total</b></td>
  2328. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">176</span></td>
  2329. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">36.5</span></td>
  2330. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2331. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2332. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2333. </tr>
  2334. </tbody>
  2335. </table>
  2336. <h2><b>Bumrah’s Brutal Finish</b></h2>
  2337. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Just when South Africa looked to build momentum, Bumrah dismantled them with another six-wicket haul. His figures speak volumes, ensuring that India only needed 79 runs to win.</span></p>
  2338. <h3><b>Indian Bowling Figures – SA 2nd Innings</b></h3>
  2339. <table>
  2340. <tbody>
  2341. <tr>
  2342. <td><b>Bowler</b></td>
  2343. <td><b>Overs</b></td>
  2344. <td><b>Maidens</b></td>
  2345. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2346. <td><b>Wickets</b></td>
  2347. <td><b>Economy</b></td>
  2348. </tr>
  2349. <tr>
  2350. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">J. Bumrah</span></td>
  2351. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">13.5</span></td>
  2352. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2353. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">61</span></td>
  2354. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  2355. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4.40</span></td>
  2356. </tr>
  2357. <tr>
  2358. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">M. Siraj</span></td>
  2359. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  2360. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  2361. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">33</span></td>
  2362. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2363. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3.40</span></td>
  2364. </tr>
  2365. <tr>
  2366. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">M. Kumar</span></td>
  2367. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  2368. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2369. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">56</span></td>
  2370. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2371. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.60</span></td>
  2372. </tr>
  2373. <tr>
  2374. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">P. Krishna</span></td>
  2375. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  2376. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2377. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">27</span></td>
  2378. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2379. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.80</span></td>
  2380. </tr>
  2381. </tbody>
  2382. </table>
  2383. <h2><b>Smooth Chase by India</b></h2>
  2384. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">India&#8217;s chase was clinical. Jaiswal gave a brisk start, while Rohit and Iyer finished the job. The target was chased in just 12 overs without much fuss.</span></p>
  2385. <h3><b>India 2nd Innings Scorecard</b></h3>
  2386. <table>
  2387. <tbody>
  2388. <tr>
  2389. <td><b>Batter</b></td>
  2390. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2391. <td><b>Balls</b></td>
  2392. <td><b>4s</b></td>
  2393. <td><b>6s</b></td>
  2394. <td><b>SR</b></td>
  2395. </tr>
  2396. <tr>
  2397. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Y. Jaiswal</span></td>
  2398. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">28</span></td>
  2399. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23</span></td>
  2400. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  2401. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2402. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">121.74</span></td>
  2403. </tr>
  2404. <tr>
  2405. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">R. Sharma (c)</span></td>
  2406. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">17*</span></td>
  2407. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">22</span></td>
  2408. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2409. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2410. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">77.27</span></td>
  2411. </tr>
  2412. <tr>
  2413. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">S. Gill</span></td>
  2414. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  2415. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></td>
  2416. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2417. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2418. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">90.91</span></td>
  2419. </tr>
  2420. <tr>
  2421. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">V. Kohli</span></td>
  2422. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12</span></td>
  2423. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></td>
  2424. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2425. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2426. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">109.09</span></td>
  2427. </tr>
  2428. <tr>
  2429. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">S. Iyer</span></td>
  2430. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4*</span></td>
  2431. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></td>
  2432. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2433. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2434. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">66.67</span></td>
  2435. </tr>
  2436. <tr>
  2437. <td><b>Extras</b></td>
  2438. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  2439. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2440. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2441. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2442. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2443. </tr>
  2444. <tr>
  2445. <td><b>Total</b></td>
  2446. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">80/3</span></td>
  2447. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12.0</span></td>
  2448. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2449. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2450. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">–</span></td>
  2451. </tr>
  2452. </tbody>
  2453. </table>
  2454. <h2><b>Match Summary Table</b></h2>
  2455. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Here’s a quick snapshot of the entire game:</span></p>
  2456. <table>
  2457. <tbody>
  2458. <tr>
  2459. <td><b>Innings</b></td>
  2460. <td><b>Score</b></td>
  2461. <td><b>Overs</b></td>
  2462. </tr>
  2463. <tr>
  2464. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">South Africa 1st Innings</span></td>
  2465. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">55</span></td>
  2466. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23.2</span></td>
  2467. </tr>
  2468. <tr>
  2469. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">India 1st Innings</span></td>
  2470. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">153</span></td>
  2471. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">34.5</span></td>
  2472. </tr>
  2473. <tr>
  2474. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">South Africa 2nd Innings</span></td>
  2475. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">176</span></td>
  2476. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">36.5</span></td>
  2477. </tr>
  2478. <tr>
  2479. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">India 2nd Innings</span></td>
  2480. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">80/3</span></td>
  2481. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12.0</span></td>
  2482. </tr>
  2483. </tbody>
  2484. </table>
  2485. <h3><b>Final Word on the Game</b></h3>
  2486. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The India national cricket team vs south africa national cricket team match scorecard highlights one of the most dominant wins by India in recent years. With pace taking center stage and strong leadership from Rohit, this match will be remembered for its intensity and speed.</span></p>
  2487. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">From the first ball to the last shot, India controlled the game. Siraj and Bumrah led with fire, and the batters backed them up just enough. For fans and analysts alike, this was a Test that truly delivered.</span></p>
  2488. <p><strong>Read More Blogs:-) </strong><a href="https://cricfevers.com/aus-vs-wi/">AUS vs WI 2025: Can West Indies Stop Australia’s Streak?</a></p>
  2489. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-south-africa-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/">India National Cricket Team vs South Africa National Cricket Team Match Scorecard</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  2490. ]]></content:encoded>
  2491. <wfw:commentRss>https://cricfevers.com/india-national-cricket-team-vs-south-africa-national-cricket-team-match-scorecard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  2492. <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
  2493. </item>
  2494. <item>
  2495. <title>Abhishek Sharma Stats: The Explosive Batter Shaping India&#8217;s T20 Future</title>
  2496. <link>https://cricfevers.com/abhishek-sharma-stats/</link>
  2497. <comments>https://cricfevers.com/abhishek-sharma-stats/#respond</comments>
  2498. <dc:creator><![CDATA[cricfevers cricfevers]]></dc:creator>
  2499. <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
  2500. <category><![CDATA[Match Matrix]]></category>
  2501. <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cricfevers.com/?p=1260</guid>
  2502.  
  2503. <description><![CDATA[<p>In Indian cricket, few names have surged as quickly as Abhishek Sharma. From being a domestic talent to becoming a strong force in T20Is, Sharma has done it all in very little time. His journey is one of bold hitting, smart shot selection, and calm nerves. But numbers say more than hype. When we study [&#8230;]</p>
  2504. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/abhishek-sharma-stats/">Abhishek Sharma Stats: The Explosive Batter Shaping India&#8217;s T20 Future</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  2505. ]]></description>
  2506. <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In Indian cricket, few names have surged as quickly as Abhishek Sharma. From being a domestic talent to becoming a strong force in T20Is, Sharma has done it all in very little time. His journey is one of bold hitting, smart shot selection, and calm nerves. But numbers say more than hype. When we study the abhishek sharma stats, we see a batter who understands his role and owns it. He brings value whether batting first, chasing, or playing abroad. His rise in 2024 and dominance in 2025 reflect real progress.</span></p>
  2507. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This post gives a full breakdown of his performance. You&#8217;ll see stats by year, venue, innings, position, and more. Let&#8217;s start by looking at how he’s grown over time.</span></p>
  2508. <h2><b>Abhishek Sharma Stats Year-on-Year Growth: The Transition to Elite</b></h2>
  2509. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Abhishek Sharma’s numbers from 2024 to 2025 show dramatic growth. In 2024, he was promising. In 2025, he was dominant. His average more than doubled. His strike rate jumped too. He turned starts into big innings. This change is not luck — it’s proof of work.</span></p>
  2510. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In 2024, fans saw glimpses of power. In 2025, he delivered complete performances. His first century came last year, but this year’s 135* against England made headlines worldwide.</span></p>
  2511. <h3><b>Yearly Performance</b></h3>
  2512. <table>
  2513. <tbody>
  2514. <tr>
  2515. <td><b>Year</b></td>
  2516. <td><b>Matches</b></td>
  2517. <td><b>Innings</b></td>
  2518. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2519. <td><b>Average</b></td>
  2520. <td><b>Strike Rate</b></td>
  2521. <td><b>100s</b></td>
  2522. <td><b>50s</b></td>
  2523. </tr>
  2524. <tr>
  2525. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2024</span></td>
  2526. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12</span></td>
  2527. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></td>
  2528. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">256</span></td>
  2529. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23.27</span></td>
  2530. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">171.81</span></td>
  2531. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2532. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2533. </tr>
  2534. <tr>
  2535. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2025</span></td>
  2536. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  2537. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  2538. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">279</span></td>
  2539. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">55.80</span></td>
  2540. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">219.68</span></td>
  2541. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2542. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2543. </tr>
  2544. </tbody>
  2545. </table>
  2546. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This yearly jump proves his place in the playing XI is no longer under debate.</span></p>
  2547. <h2><b>Home and Away: Sharma Travels Well</b></h2>
  2548. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Some players rely on home pitches. Not Abhishek. He thrives in India, but also plays well abroad. His game is flexible, adapting to pace or spin, bounce or turn. His 135 in India was majestic. But 100 in Zimbabwe showed grit.</span></p>
  2549. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">He reads conditions fast. And most importantly, he scores at a strike rate over 170 anywhere.</span></p>
  2550. <h3><b>Home vs Away Performance</b></h3>
  2551. <table>
  2552. <tbody>
  2553. <tr>
  2554. <td><b>Venue</b></td>
  2555. <td><b>Matches</b></td>
  2556. <td><b>Innings</b></td>
  2557. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2558. <td><b>Average</b></td>
  2559. <td><b>Strike Rate</b></td>
  2560. <td><b>100s</b></td>
  2561. <td><b>50s</b></td>
  2562. </tr>
  2563. <tr>
  2564. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Home</span></td>
  2565. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  2566. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  2567. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">314</span></td>
  2568. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">39.25</span></td>
  2569. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">210.73</span></td>
  2570. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2571. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2572. </tr>
  2573. <tr>
  2574. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Away</span></td>
  2575. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  2576. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></td>
  2577. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">221</span></td>
  2578. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">27.62</span></td>
  2579. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">174.01</span></td>
  2580. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2581. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2582. </tr>
  2583. </tbody>
  2584. </table>
  2585. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The numbers prove he isn’t just a home-track bully. He’s dependable anywhere.</span></p>
  2586. <h2><b>Innings Impact: Strong Starts and Steady Chases</b></h2>
  2587. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">No matter when Abhishek bats, he plays with control. He’s calm during powerplays and explosive in the death overs. Most of his runs came while batting first. But his performance while chasing is just as exciting.</span></p>
  2588. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This flexibility makes him key to India&#8217;s T20 strategies. Few players hold averages above 35 with strike rates near 200. Sharma is among those few.</span></p>
  2589. <h3><b>Performance by Match Innings</b></h3>
  2590. <table>
  2591. <tbody>
  2592. <tr>
  2593. <td><b>Match Innings</b></td>
  2594. <td><b>Innings</b></td>
  2595. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2596. <td><b>Average</b></td>
  2597. <td><b>Strike Rate</b></td>
  2598. <td><b>100s</b></td>
  2599. <td><b>50s</b></td>
  2600. </tr>
  2601. <tr>
  2602. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">First</span></td>
  2603. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></td>
  2604. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">404</span></td>
  2605. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">36.72</span></td>
  2606. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">191.46</span></td>
  2607. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2608. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2609. </tr>
  2610. <tr>
  2611. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Second</span></td>
  2612. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  2613. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">131</span></td>
  2614. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">26.20</span></td>
  2615. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">201.53</span></td>
  2616. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2617. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2618. </tr>
  2619. </tbody>
  2620. </table>
  2621. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">His second innings numbers are just warming up — expect bigger scores there soon.</span></p>
  2622. <h2><b>Abhishek Sharma Stats: The Power of Batting Position</b></h2>
  2623. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Abhishek’s best role is opening or coming in at #2. That’s where he controls the game. His numbers drop at position three, which shows how vital it is to place him up front.</span></p>
  2624. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Why does he perform better at #2? He loves facing new balls. He starts fast, rotates well, and punishes short balls. His shot selection early on is world-class.</span></p>
  2625. <h3><b>Performance by Batting Position</b></h3>
  2626. <table>
  2627. <tbody>
  2628. <tr>
  2629. <td><b>Batting Position</b></td>
  2630. <td><b>Innings</b></td>
  2631. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2632. <td><b>Average</b></td>
  2633. <td><b>Strike Rate</b></td>
  2634. <td><b>100s</b></td>
  2635. <td><b>50s</b></td>
  2636. </tr>
  2637. <tr>
  2638. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1st</span></td>
  2639. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2640. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2641. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.00</span></td>
  2642. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0.00</span></td>
  2643. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2644. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2645. </tr>
  2646. <tr>
  2647. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2nd</span></td>
  2648. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">13</span></td>
  2649. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">511</span></td>
  2650. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">39.30</span></td>
  2651. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">202.77</span></td>
  2652. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2653. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2654. </tr>
  2655. <tr>
  2656. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3rd</span></td>
  2657. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2658. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">24</span></td>
  2659. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">12.00</span></td>
  2660. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">120.00</span></td>
  2661. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2662. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">0</span></td>
  2663. </tr>
  2664. </tbody>
  2665. </table>
  2666. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">His 500+ runs at position 2 came in just 13 innings — a great strike rate for any opener.</span></p>
  2667. <h2><b>Toss Doesn’t Decide His Game</b></h2>
  2668. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Sharma doesn’t depend on luck. Even when India loses the toss, he performs. His batting average and strike rate barely change. That’s a rare trait. Most players do better in known conditions. Abhishek adapts fast, and hits hard regardless.</span></p>
  2669. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The balance in his numbers proves maturity beyond his age.</span></p>
  2670. <h3><b>Performance Based on Toss Result</b></h3>
  2671. <table>
  2672. <tbody>
  2673. <tr>
  2674. <td><b>Toss Result</b></td>
  2675. <td><b>Matches</b></td>
  2676. <td><b>Innings</b></td>
  2677. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2678. <td><b>Average</b></td>
  2679. <td><b>Strike Rate</b></td>
  2680. <td><b>100s</b></td>
  2681. <td><b>50s</b></td>
  2682. </tr>
  2683. <tr>
  2684. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Won Toss</span></td>
  2685. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></td>
  2686. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></td>
  2687. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">281</span></td>
  2688. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">31.22</span></td>
  2689. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">196.50</span></td>
  2690. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2691. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2692. </tr>
  2693. <tr>
  2694. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lost Toss</span></td>
  2695. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  2696. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></td>
  2697. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">254</span></td>
  2698. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">36.28</span></td>
  2699. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">190.97</span></td>
  2700. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2701. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2702. </tr>
  2703. </tbody>
  2704. </table>
  2705. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Whether batting first or chasing, Abhishek gives India a winning edge.</span></p>
  2706. <h2><b>Victory Equals Performance</b></h2>
  2707. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Abhishek&#8217;s numbers go up in winning games. That’s what elite players do — they step up when the team needs them most. He saves his best for moments that decide the match.</span></p>
  2708. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">He’s already scored over 500 runs in 14 wins. His strike rate is over 200 in these matches. That’s match-winning form.</span></p>
  2709. <ul>
  2710. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Runs in wins: 507</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2711. </span></li>
  2712. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Matches won: 14</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2713. </span></li>
  2714. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Average: 39.00</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2715. </span></li>
  2716. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Sixes: 41</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2717. </span></li>
  2718. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Fours: 40</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2719. </span></li>
  2720. </ul>
  2721. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Clearly, Abhishek Sharma stats show his impact when it matters.</span></p>
  2722. <h2><b>Against the Best, He Gets Better</b></h2>
  2723. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Big games, big teams, big moments — Abhishek doesn’t hide. He thrives. His 135 vs England was one of the fastest tons by an Indian. He also hit a century in Zimbabwe, showing he can perform away from home.</span></p>
  2724. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Against South Africa, he scored a half-century and kept India steady. These are teams known for quality bowling. And Abhishek scored freely.</span></p>
  2725. <ul>
  2726. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">135 vs England</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2727. </span></li>
  2728. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">100 vs Zimbabwe</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2729. </span></li>
  2730. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">50 vs South Africa</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2731. </span></li>
  2732. </ul>
  2733. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">If these early signs continue, He’ll dominate the T20I leaderboards soon.</span></p>
  2734. <h2><b>Conclusion: The Story Behind Abhishek Sharma Stats</b></h2>
  2735. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Abhishek Sharma is no longer a backup player. He’s a top-order beast. His numbers match elite levels. The best part? He’s just getting started.</span></p>
  2736. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Let’s summarize:</span></p>
  2737. <ul>
  2738. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">535 runs in 17 matches</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2739. </span></li>
  2740. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Average: 33.43</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2741. </span></li>
  2742. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Strike Rate: 193.84</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2743. </span></li>
  2744. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">2 centuries and 2 fifties</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2745. </span></li>
  2746. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">87 boundaries (46 fours, 41 sixes)</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  2747. </span></li>
  2748. </ul>
  2749. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">These abhishek sharma stats show more than numbers. They tell us about a player who believes in big goals and even bigger hits. He’s the type of batter who turns the game with 10 balls. He gives India fire at the top. And he’s only getting better. Keep watching. More centuries will come. More records will fall.</span></p>
  2750. <p><strong>Read More Blogs:-) </strong><a href="https://cricfevers.com/2013-champions-trophy-final-scorecard/">2013 Champions Trophy Final Scorecard: India vs England Thriller</a></p>
  2751. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/abhishek-sharma-stats/">Abhishek Sharma Stats: The Explosive Batter Shaping India&#8217;s T20 Future</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  2752. ]]></content:encoded>
  2753. <wfw:commentRss>https://cricfevers.com/abhishek-sharma-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  2754. <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
  2755. </item>
  2756. <item>
  2757. <title>Follower Count Matters for Cricket Influencers</title>
  2758. <link>https://cricfevers.com/follower-count-matters-for-cricket-influencers/</link>
  2759. <dc:creator><![CDATA[zestful Grace]]></dc:creator>
  2760. <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 09:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
  2761. <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
  2762. <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cricfevers.com/?p=1252</guid>
  2763.  
  2764. <description><![CDATA[<p>If your aspiration is to become an influencer of cricket, your followers&#8217; count is very, very important. It is not only numbers. It is evidence of people listening to and watching you. It makes you known, gain credibility, and mature fast. Even if your content is good, very few individuals would watch your content if [&#8230;]</p>
  2765. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/follower-count-matters-for-cricket-influencers/">Follower Count Matters for Cricket Influencers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  2766. ]]></description>
  2767. <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400">If your aspiration is to become an influencer of cricket, your followers&#8217; count is very, very important. It is not only numbers. It is evidence of people listening to and watching you. It makes you known, gain credibility, and mature fast.</span></p>
  2768. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">Even if your content is good, very few individuals would watch your content if your account is minimal. As your follow count increases, your views also increase. You gain popularity amongst brands, fans, as well as gamers.</span></p>
  2769. <h2><span style="font-weight: 400">Why Followers Are Important for Cricket</span></h2>
  2770. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">Cricket is more than just a sport—it’s a way of life for millions across several countries. It unites people through shared emotions, spirited rivalries, and passionate support, creating massive online communities that thrive on every match, highlight, and player moment.</span></p>
  2771. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">If you&#8217;re an Instagram or TikTok influencer sharing cricket-related content, your profile becomes a digital hub for fans who resonate with that passion. It’s not just a feed—it’s a gathering place. That makes you highly valuable to brands seeking visibility on Instagram or TikTok. They target creators with either </span><a href="https://views4you.com/"><span style="font-weight: 400">large follower base</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400"> or highly engaged audiences because they need attention—and your cricket-driven content can provide just that. The bigger and more connected your community, the more investment-worthy your presence becomes.</span></p>
  2772. <h2><span style="font-weight: 400">Large Numbers Bring Greater Reach</span></h2>
  2773. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">TikTok and Instagram, for example, compensate for high accounts. </span><a href="https://www.wisden.com/cricket-news/whats-trending-in-cricket-social-media-updates-top-tweets-viral-memes-and-more-july-16-2024"><span style="font-weight: 400">Popular content in cricket</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400"> is promoted by algorithms. It is fairer that content of an account that has 100,000 followers is presented rather than content that has 500 followers.</span></p>
  2774. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">That does not look fair, but that is the way it is. To have your content viewed by people, your profile has to appear active. You require more followers to appear prominent and draw attention.</span></p>
  2775. <h2><span style="font-weight: 400">Access Depends on Your Audience</span></h2>
  2776. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">By being an influencer of cricket, you can take advantage of special event access. These might involve match launches, </span><a href="https://sportfive.com/beyond-the-match/insights/how-athlete-partnerships-redefine-sports-marketing"><span style="font-weight: 400">player interactions and partnerships</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400">, or press boxes. Entry to these is not automatic.</span></p>
  2777. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">Promoters take care of your profile. They&#8217;re interested in knowing your reach. You have thousands of followers; they&#8217;re going to know your content is going viral. It is good for them as well. The follower count is your pass that leads to your inner circle.</span></p>
  2778. <h2><span style="font-weight: 400">Followers Mean Trust and Authority</span></h2>
  2779. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">They also follow other accounts that people already follow. This is what is called social proof. When your profile has numerous followers, brand-new visitors have higher chances of also following you.</span></p>
  2780. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">It’s credibility proof. They’re all, like, “A lot of people follow that guy. He is worth it.” This is where large accounts get even larger. You have many followers, and that already makes you an expert even before other people watch your content.</span></p>
  2781. <h2><span style="font-weight: 400">Cricketers Notice Big Profiles</span></h2>
  2782. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">Come on. Even cricket stars would like to react to or repost good accounts&#8217; messages. It also makes them more vulnerable. Your figures must look good if you&#8217;re worth the reaction of the players.</span></p>
  2783. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">That is not millions. But achieving several thousand quality followers is of tremendous worth.</span></p>
  2784. <h2><span style="font-weight: 400">Content Become Business</span></h2>
  2785. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">Cricket influencers these days have moved on from uploading clips. They sell gear, have podcasts, set up fantasy games, and even have affiliate links they promote. These only generate revenues if there are enough eyeballs.</span></p>
  2786. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">Whenever your fan base is large, your revenues are high. You can have campaigns, sponsorships, as well as your own line of products. Your fans are your fans too, as well as your wealth.</span></p>
  2787. <h2><span style="font-weight: 400">Organic Growth Is Slow</span></h2>
  2788. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">And you can also organically grow, of course. It is time-consuming, however. Posting every day, posting the trend, and posting chat for your live games. It does all help. But it&#8217;s a slower process, and it has highs and lows.</span></p>
  2789. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">That is why most of the influencers seek smarter ways of increasing fans. They employ honest means that can assist them in increasing numbers and achieving the objective. It’s not cheating. It’s shrewd planning.</span></p>
  2790. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">Employed correctly, they put you ahead of the curve. After building your followers, your own content works for you.</span></p>
  2791. <h2><span style="font-weight: 400">Followers Unlock Better Chances</span></h2>
  2792. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">Place your profile into consideration as a stadium. You can’t play big games in a mini stadium. You require a large stadium to play large games. Your fans convert your profile into where things take place.</span></p>
  2793. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">To grow as an aspiring cricket content provider, growing your listenership comes first. For every new follower, your voice power increases.</span></p>
  2794. <h2><span style="font-weight: 400">You Still Need Quality Content</span></h2>
  2795. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">Clearly, fans won’t suffice. You must appease your fans. Blog frequently. Keep it honest. Interact. Pose questions. Don’t put fraudulent concepts out there. Pay attention to <a href="https://nxytbig.com/">cricket media</a>. Utilize memes when necessary.</span></p>
  2796. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">That is, of course, if no one ever views that. And that is only accomplished if your follower count does increase.</span></p>
  2797. <h2><span style="font-weight: 400">FAQs</span></h2>
  2798. <h3><span style="font-weight: 400">1. Why is that follower count so large?</span></h3>
  2799. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">It lets people find and trust you. It also widens your reach. </span></p>
  2800. <h3><span style="font-weight: 400">2. Can I grow with a few followers? </span></h3>
  2801. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">Yes, but tedious and laborious. It would take longer for development. </span></p>
  2802. <h3><span style="font-weight: 400">3. Are brands only concerned about followers? </span></h3>
  2803. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">They also look into engagement. But a bigger follow count comes first. </span></p>
  2804. <h3><span style="font-weight: 400">4. How can I acquire more followers? </span></h3>
  2805. <p><span style="font-weight: 400">Update frequently, remain up-to-date, engage with your followers, and try out secure growth tools. </span></p>
  2806. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/follower-count-matters-for-cricket-influencers/">Follower Count Matters for Cricket Influencers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  2807. ]]></content:encoded>
  2808. </item>
  2809. <item>
  2810. <title>2025 Indian Premier League Stats: A Deep Dive into This Season’s Numbers</title>
  2811. <link>https://cricfevers.com/2025-indian-premier-league-stats/</link>
  2812. <comments>https://cricfevers.com/2025-indian-premier-league-stats/#respond</comments>
  2813. <dc:creator><![CDATA[cricfevers cricfevers]]></dc:creator>
  2814. <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 12:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
  2815. <category><![CDATA[Match Matrix]]></category>
  2816. <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cricfevers.com/?p=1248</guid>
  2817.  
  2818. <description><![CDATA[<p>The 2025 IPL brought drama, records, and unforgettable cricket. Each match kept fans on edge. Every team had its moment. And as always, some players rose above the rest. This year’s IPL wasn’t just about big names. It was about raw numbers. The 2025 Indian Premier League stats captured performances, surprises, and milestones that will [&#8230;]</p>
  2819. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/2025-indian-premier-league-stats/">2025 Indian Premier League Stats: A Deep Dive into This Season’s Numbers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  2820. ]]></description>
  2821. <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The 2025 IPL brought drama, records, and unforgettable cricket. Each match kept fans on edge. Every team had its moment. And as always, some players rose above the rest. This year’s IPL wasn’t just about big names. It was about raw numbers. The 2025 Indian Premier League stats captured performances, surprises, and milestones that will be talked about for years. From batting explosions to bowling brilliance, the numbers tell a thrilling tale.</span></p>
  2822. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We’ll now look at top batters, strike rate heroes, consistent scorers, and standout bowlers. But we won’t stop there. We’ll also dive into team performances, fielding records, and fantasy league favorites. Let’s begin.</span></p>
  2823. <h2><b>2025 Indian Premier League Stats: Top Batting Stars Who Ruled the Season</b></h2>
  2824. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Batters had a feast this year. Flat pitches, fast outfields, and fearless approaches meant huge scores. But only a few stood out match after match.</span></p>
  2825. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The table below features the five top run-getters who dominated across innings with consistency, class, and confidence.</span></p>
  2826. <h3><b>Top Run Scorers – IPL 2025</b></h3>
  2827. <table>
  2828. <tbody>
  2829. <tr>
  2830. <td><b>Player</b></td>
  2831. <td><b>Matches</b></td>
  2832. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2833. <td><b>Average</b></td>
  2834. <td><b>Strike Rate</b></td>
  2835. </tr>
  2836. <tr>
  2837. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Sai Sudharsan</span></td>
  2838. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">15</span></td>
  2839. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">759</span></td>
  2840. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">54.21</span></td>
  2841. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">156.17</span></td>
  2842. </tr>
  2843. <tr>
  2844. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Suryakumar Yadav</span></td>
  2845. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">16</span></td>
  2846. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">717</span></td>
  2847. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">65.18</span></td>
  2848. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">167.92</span></td>
  2849. </tr>
  2850. <tr>
  2851. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Virat Kohli</span></td>
  2852. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">15</span></td>
  2853. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">657</span></td>
  2854. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">54.75</span></td>
  2855. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">144.71</span></td>
  2856. </tr>
  2857. <tr>
  2858. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shubman Gill</span></td>
  2859. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">15</span></td>
  2860. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">650</span></td>
  2861. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">50.00</span></td>
  2862. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">155.88</span></td>
  2863. </tr>
  2864. <tr>
  2865. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mitchell Marsh</span></td>
  2866. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">13</span></td>
  2867. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">627</span></td>
  2868. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">48.23</span></td>
  2869. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">163.71</span></td>
  2870. </tr>
  2871. </tbody>
  2872. </table>
  2873. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Sudharsan’s rise was spectacular. Kohli and Yadav proved again why they’re among the best. Gill and Marsh were match-winners every time they walked in.</span></p>
  2874. <h2><b>2025 Indian Premier League Stats: Strike Rate Legends Who Changed the Game</b></h2>
  2875. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">High strike rates made the difference this year. These players didn’t just score; they attacked every ball.</span></p>
  2876. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">They weren’t afraid to take risks. The table below shows who led the charge in scoring quick, game-changing runs.</span></p>
  2877. <h3><b>Top Strike Rates – IPL 2025</b></h3>
  2878. <table>
  2879. <tbody>
  2880. <tr>
  2881. <td><b>Player</b></td>
  2882. <td><b>Strike Rate</b></td>
  2883. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2884. <td><b>Innings</b></td>
  2885. </tr>
  2886. <tr>
  2887. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nicholas Pooran</span></td>
  2888. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">196.25</span></td>
  2889. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">524</span></td>
  2890. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">14</span></td>
  2891. </tr>
  2892. <tr>
  2893. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Abhishek Sharma</span></td>
  2894. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">193.39</span></td>
  2895. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">439</span></td>
  2896. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">13</span></td>
  2897. </tr>
  2898. <tr>
  2899. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shreyas Iyer</span></td>
  2900. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">175.07</span></td>
  2901. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">604</span></td>
  2902. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">17</span></td>
  2903. </tr>
  2904. <tr>
  2905. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Heinrich Klaasen</span></td>
  2906. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">172.70</span></td>
  2907. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">487</span></td>
  2908. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">13</span></td>
  2909. </tr>
  2910. </tbody>
  2911. </table>
  2912. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">These four added momentum in the middle overs. <a href="https://www.mykhel.com/cricket/ipl-2025-nicholas-pooran-hits-sixes-in-every-match-leads-chart-with-24-maximums-in-just-5-games-354383.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Pooran’s fearless sixes</a> and Sharma’s fast starts left bowlers with no answers.</span></p>
  2913. <h2><b>Batters Who Found the Boundary Often</b></h2>
  2914. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Fans love fours and sixes. Every big hit shifts the energy in a stadium. This year, some players mastered the art of boundary-hitting.</span></p>
  2915. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Here are the biggest boundary hitters of IPL 2025.</span></p>
  2916. <h3><b>Most Fours and Sixes – IPL 2025</b></h3>
  2917. <table>
  2918. <tbody>
  2919. <tr>
  2920. <td><b>Player</b></td>
  2921. <td><b>Fours</b></td>
  2922. <td><b>Sixes</b></td>
  2923. </tr>
  2924. <tr>
  2925. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Sai Sudharsan</span></td>
  2926. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">88</span></td>
  2927. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">21</span></td>
  2928. </tr>
  2929. <tr>
  2930. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Suryakumar Yadav</span></td>
  2931. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">69</span></td>
  2932. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">38</span></td>
  2933. </tr>
  2934. <tr>
  2935. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mitchell Marsh</span></td>
  2936. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">56</span></td>
  2937. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">37</span></td>
  2938. </tr>
  2939. <tr>
  2940. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nicholas Pooran</span></td>
  2941. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">45</span></td>
  2942. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">40</span></td>
  2943. </tr>
  2944. <tr>
  2945. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Yashasvi Jaiswal</span></td>
  2946. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">60</span></td>
  2947. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">28</span></td>
  2948. </tr>
  2949. </tbody>
  2950. </table>
  2951. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pooran’s 40 sixes lit up stadiums. Sudharsan showed class with 88 crisp fours.</span></p>
  2952. <h2><b>Most Reliable Run-Scorers of the Season</b></h2>
  2953. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Scoring 600+ runs in a season is tough. Doing it at a high average is tougher. These batters were calm under pressure and delivered often.</span></p>
  2954. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">They helped set totals, chased targets, and absorbed pressure when others failed.</span></p>
  2955. <h3><b>Consistent Batters – IPL 2025</b></h3>
  2956. <table>
  2957. <tbody>
  2958. <tr>
  2959. <td><b>Player</b></td>
  2960. <td><b>Runs</b></td>
  2961. <td><b>Average</b></td>
  2962. <td><b>50s</b></td>
  2963. <td><b>100s</b></td>
  2964. </tr>
  2965. <tr>
  2966. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">KL Rahul</span></td>
  2967. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">539</span></td>
  2968. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">53.90</span></td>
  2969. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></td>
  2970. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2971. </tr>
  2972. <tr>
  2973. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jos Buttler</span></td>
  2974. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">538</span></td>
  2975. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">59.78</span></td>
  2976. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  2977. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  2978. </tr>
  2979. <tr>
  2980. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shreyas Iyer</span></td>
  2981. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">604</span></td>
  2982. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">50.33</span></td>
  2983. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  2984. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2985. </tr>
  2986. <tr>
  2987. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shubman Gill</span></td>
  2988. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">650</span></td>
  2989. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">50.00</span></td>
  2990. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  2991. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></td>
  2992. </tr>
  2993. </tbody>
  2994. </table>
  2995. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rahul and Buttler stayed out many times. Their finishing ability stood out all season.</span></p>
  2996. <h2><b>Best Bowlers Who Turned Matches</b></h2>
  2997. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">While batters got the glory, bowlers won matches too. Some were deadly. Others got early breakthroughs. A few controlled runs with tight lines.</span></p>
  2998. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Here are the best of the best bowlers this season.</span></p>
  2999. <h3><b>Top Bowlers – IPL 2025</b></h3>
  3000. <table>
  3001. <tbody>
  3002. <tr>
  3003. <td><b>Bowler</b></td>
  3004. <td><b>Wickets</b></td>
  3005. <td><b>Economy</b></td>
  3006. <td><b>Best Figures</b></td>
  3007. </tr>
  3008. <tr>
  3009. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jasprit Bumrah</span></td>
  3010. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">25</span></td>
  3011. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.45</span></td>
  3012. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4/18</span></td>
  3013. </tr>
  3014. <tr>
  3015. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rashid Khan</span></td>
  3016. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">23</span></td>
  3017. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.10</span></td>
  3018. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3/11</span></td>
  3019. </tr>
  3020. <tr>
  3021. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kuldeep Yadav</span></td>
  3022. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">21</span></td>
  3023. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.80</span></td>
  3024. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4/20</span></td>
  3025. </tr>
  3026. <tr>
  3027. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Harshal Patel</span></td>
  3028. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">20</span></td>
  3029. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.15</span></td>
  3030. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">5/27</span></td>
  3031. </tr>
  3032. <tr>
  3033. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Yuzvendra Chahal</span></td>
  3034. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">20</span></td>
  3035. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.95</span></td>
  3036. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3/14</span></td>
  3037. </tr>
  3038. </tbody>
  3039. </table>
  3040. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bumrah’s yorkers and Rashid’s googlies stood tall in crunch games. Kuldeep and Chahal spun webs in the middle overs.</span></p>
  3041. <h2><b>High Team Totals That Demanded Attention</b></h2>
  3042. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Some teams just batted other sides out of contests. Whether it was setting huge scores or chasing tall targets, a few teams dominated with the bat.</span></p>
  3043. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">These team totals speak volumes about their batting line-ups.</span></p>
  3044. <h3><b>Team Totals and Averages – IPL 2025</b></h3>
  3045. <table>
  3046. <tbody>
  3047. <tr>
  3048. <td><b>Team</b></td>
  3049. <td><b>Highest Score</b></td>
  3050. <td><b>Average Total</b></td>
  3051. <td><b>Chases Won</b></td>
  3052. </tr>
  3053. <tr>
  3054. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mumbai Indians</span></td>
  3055. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">268</span></td>
  3056. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">198.3</span></td>
  3057. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></td>
  3058. </tr>
  3059. <tr>
  3060. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lucknow Super Giants</span></td>
  3061. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">251</span></td>
  3062. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">192.1</span></td>
  3063. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  3064. </tr>
  3065. <tr>
  3066. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rajasthan Royals</span></td>
  3067. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">242</span></td>
  3068. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">189.5</span></td>
  3069. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></td>
  3070. </tr>
  3071. <tr>
  3072. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Royal Challengers Bangalore</span></td>
  3073. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">239</span></td>
  3074. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">186.7</span></td>
  3075. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  3076. </tr>
  3077. <tr>
  3078. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">Delhi Capitals</span></td>
  3079. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">230</span></td>
  3080. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">183.6</span></td>
  3081. <td><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></td>
  3082. </tr>
  3083. </tbody>
  3084. </table>
  3085. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mumbai’s 268 was the highest in IPL history. RR and LSG also had stellar run chases.</span></p>
  3086. <h2><b>2025 Indian Premier League Stats: Match-Winning Knocks That Stood Out</b></h2>
  3087. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A few innings were unforgettable. Under pressure, on tough wickets, and against strong attacks—these knocks made a difference.</span></p>
  3088. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Some notable performances:</span></p>
  3089. <ul>
  3090. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mitchell Marsh – 112 off 38 balls</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3091. </span></li>
  3092. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">KL Rahul – 98* in a chase</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3093. </span></li>
  3094. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Sudharsan – 102 in qualifier</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3095. </span></li>
  3096. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nicholas Pooran – 84 off 27 balls</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3097. </span></li>
  3098. </ul>
  3099. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">These innings changed playoff fates and made headlines.</span></p>
  3100. <h2><b>Young Players Who Impressed All</b></h2>
  3101. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">IPL gives a platform to fresh talent. In 2025, many uncapped players earned fan following.</span></p>
  3102. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Top young talents:</span></p>
  3103. <ul>
  3104. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Priyansh Arya – 475 runs, SR 179</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3105. </span></li>
  3106. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Abhishek Sharma – 439 runs, SR 193</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3107. </span></li>
  3108. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ravi Bishnoi – 18 wickets, economy under 7</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3109. </span></li>
  3110. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tilak Varma – consistent finishing roles</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3111. </span></li>
  3112. </ul>
  3113. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">They’re now top contenders for India call-ups.</span></p>
  3114. <h2><b>Fielding Moments That Shifted Momentum</b></h2>
  3115. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Fielding wins matches. Saves, catches, and run-outs built pressure this season. A few players were fielding machines.</span></p>
  3116. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Best fielders of IPL 2025:</span></p>
  3117. <ul>
  3118. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ravindra Jadeja – 10 catches, 4 run-outs</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3119. </span></li>
  3120. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">David Warner – great saves on the boundary</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3121. </span></li>
  3122. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rinku Singh – 7 catches, no drops</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3123. </span></li>
  3124. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Glenn Maxwell – game-changing direct hits</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3125. </span></li>
  3126. </ul>
  3127. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Stats aside, they brought energy that lifted teams.</span></p>
  3128. <h2><b>Fantasy League Favorites</b></h2>
  3129. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Fantasy cricket is now part of IPL fun. These players topped charts and earned the most fantasy points.</span></p>
  3130. <ul>
  3131. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Sai Sudharsan – most points for batters</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3132. </span></li>
  3133. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jasprit Bumrah – top bowling choice</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3134. </span></li>
  3135. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Suryakumar Yadav – big points for strike rate</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3136. </span></li>
  3137. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pooran – six bonus points almost every match</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3138. </span></li>
  3139. </ul>
  3140. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Fantasy users loved the 2025 Indian Premier League stats more than ever.</span></p>
  3141. <h2><b>Viral Moments from the 2025 IPL</b></h2>
  3142. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Social media buzz was bigger than ever. Each day, one performance or celebration went viral.</span></p>
  3143. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Top viral moments:</span></p>
  3144. <ul>
  3145. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kohli’s bow-and-arrow celebration</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3146. </span></li>
  3147. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pooran’s no-look six</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3148. </span></li>
  3149. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ruturaj Gaikwad’s one-handed catch</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3150. </span></li>
  3151. <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Fans in Chennai doing Sudharsan dance</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />
  3152. </span></li>
  3153. </ul>
  3154. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">These moments made the tournament more than just cricket.</span></p>
  3155. <h3><b>Final Thoughts on IPL 2025</b></h3>
  3156. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">What a season! Records broken. Stars born. And numbers to back it all. The 2025 Indian Premier League stats showed us which players rose under pressure, which teams adapted, and who the true game changers were.</span></p>
  3157. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Whether you’re into batting brilliance, bowling mastery, or fantasy wins, this IPL had it all. And best of all? The stats made every performance even sweeter.</span></p>
  3158. <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">If you want a PDF report or want us to build a custom player comparison tool for IPL 2025, just say the word!</span></p>
  3159. <p><strong>Read More Blogs:-) </strong><a href="https://cricfevers.com/2013-champions-trophy-final-scorecard/">2013 Champions Trophy Final Scorecard: India vs England Thriller</a></p>
  3160. <p>The post <a href="https://cricfevers.com/2025-indian-premier-league-stats/">2025 Indian Premier League Stats: A Deep Dive into This Season’s Numbers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cricfevers.com">Cric Fevers</a>.</p>
  3161. ]]></content:encoded>
  3162. <wfw:commentRss>https://cricfevers.com/2025-indian-premier-league-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  3163. <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
  3164. </item>
  3165. </channel>
  3166. </rss>
  3167.  

If you would like to create a banner that links to this page (i.e. this validation result), do the following:

  1. Download the "valid RSS" banner.

  2. Upload the image to your own server. (This step is important. Please do not link directly to the image on this server.)

  3. Add this HTML to your page (change the image src attribute if necessary):

If you would like to create a text link instead, here is the URL you can use:

http://www.feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=https%3A//cricfevers.com/feed/

Copyright © 2002-9 Sam Ruby, Mark Pilgrim, Joseph Walton, and Phil Ringnalda